xhr2.setRequestHeader('Content-Length', sArgs.length); xhr2.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'); xhr2.send(sArgs); }, get: function (sUrl, bAsync, fCallBack, errmsg) { var xhr2 = this.init(); xhr2.onreadystatechange = function () { if (xhr2.readyState == 4) { if (xhr2.responseText) { if (fCallBack.constructor == Function) { fCallBack(xhr2); } } else { alert(errmsg); } } }; xhr2.open('GET', encodeURI(sUrl), bAsync); xhr2.send('Null'); } } function SetSearchLink(item) { var url = "../journal/recordsearchinformation.aspx"; var skid = $(":hidden[id$=HiddenField_SKID]").val(); var args = "skid=" + skid; url = url + "?" + args + "&urllink=" + item; window.setTimeout("showSearchUrl('" + url + "')", 300); } function showSearchUrl(url) { var callback2 = function (xhr2) { } ajax2.get(url, true, callback2, "try"); }
JMP> Vol.6 No.13, October 2015
Share This Article:
Cite This Paper >>

Measurement Problem and Two-State Vector Formalism

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:214KB) PP. 1864-1867
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2015.613191    2,726 Downloads   3,282 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment
Kunihisa Morita


Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.


In this paper, I show that an interpretation of quantum mechanics using two-state vector formalism proposed by Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz, can solve one of the measurement problems formulated by Maudlin. According to this interpretation, we can simultaneously insist that the wave function of a system is complete, that the wave function is determined by the Schrödinger equation, and that the measurement of a physical quantity always has determinate outcomes, although Maudlin in his formulation of the measurement problem states that these three claims are mutually inconsistent. Further, I show that my interpretation does not contradict the uncertainty relation and the no-go theorem.


Two-State Vector Formalism, Measurement Problem, No-Go Theorem

Cite this paper

Morita, K. (2015) Measurement Problem and Two-State Vector Formalism. Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 1864-1867. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.613191.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Maudlin, T. (1995) Three Measurement Problems. Topoi, 14, 7-15.
[2] Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P.G. and Lebowitz, J.L. (1964) Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement. Physical Review B, 134, 1410-1416.
[3] haronov, Y. and Vaidman, L. (1990) Properties of a Quantum System during the Time Interval between Two Measurements. Physical Review A, 41, 11-20.
[4] Yokota, K., Yamamoto, T., Koashi, M. and Imoto, N. (2009) Direct Observation of Hardy’s Paradox by Joint Weak Measurement with an Entangled Photon Pair. New Journal of Physics, 11, Article ID: 033011.
[5] Hosoya, A. and Koga, M. (2011) Weak Values as Context Dependent Values of Observables and Born’s Rule. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44, Article ID: 415303.
[6] Morita, K. (2015) Einstein Dilemma and Two-State Vector Formalism. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 5, 41-46.
[7] Aharonov, Y., Popescu, S. and Tollaksen, J. (2010) A Time-Symmetric Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Physics Today, 63, 27-32.
[8] Kochen, S.B. and Specker, E.P. (1967) The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59-87.
[9] Mermin, N.D. (1993) Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 803-815.
[10] Tollaksen, J. (2007) Pre- and Post-Selection, Weak Values and Contextuality. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40, 9033-9066.

comments powered by Disqus
JMP Subscription
E-Mail Alert
JMP Most popular papers
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
JMP News
Frequently Asked Questions
Recommend to Peers
Recommend to Library
Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.