Development of a Reproducible Rating System for Sun Protective Clothing That Incorporates Body Surface Coverage

Simone L. Harrison¹, Nathan Downs²

¹Skin Cancer Research Unit, Division of Tropical Health & Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
²Faculty of Health, Engineering & Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2015.33C031                

Abstract

Sunlight is a known skin carcinogen. Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in humans, and typically affects sun-exposed parts of the body. Sunny Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence of skin cancer globally. Clothing provides a protective barrier that reduces the amount of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) reaching the skin. Australia pioneered the development of a relative ranking of the sun-protective capabilities of clothing based on the transmission of UVR through fabric. Standardized Ultraviolet Protection Factor (UPF) measurement procedures and associated labeling specifications are documented in the Australian and New Zealand Standard, AS/NZS 4399:1996. The standard was intended to enable consumers to make informed choices. Since its introduction, this standard has been adopted almost universally by the textile industry, and is still in use almost two decades on, with plans to revise it only commencing recently. However, AS/NZS 4399:1996 does not consider garment design, particularly in relation to body surface coverage. Although swim-shirts have grown in popularity in Australia since the late 1990s, particularly among children, clothing remains under-utilized as a form of sun-protection in contemporary society. Skin cancer prevention campaigns should emphasize the sun-protective benefits of clothing and collaboration with the fashion industry is urgently needed to improve the aesthetic appeal, comfort, durability and affordability of sun-protective clothing to increase its popularity in skin cancer prone populations. In light of recent evidence showing that high UPF clothing which covers more of the body surface reduces pigmented mole development in children (major risk factor for melanoma), the rating system for sun-protective clothing should incorporate body surface covered as well as the UPF of the fabric. We discuss progress towards developing a protocol for measuring the extent of coverage of sun-protective garments. Once fully evaluated and refined, the testing protocol developed from this research may influence future revisions of international standards for evaluating and classifying sun-protective clothing.

Keywords

Skin Cancer, Sun-Protection, Clothing, Ultraviolet Radiation, Child, Health, Standards, UPF

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (2011) Townsville Realtime UV Index Data. http://www.arpansa.gov.au/uvindex/realtime/tow_rt.htm
[2]	Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (2010) Cancer in Australia: An Overview. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.
[3]	Staples, M.P., Elwood, M., Burton, R.C., Williams, J.L., Marks, R. and Giles, G.G. (2006) Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Australia: The 2002 National Survey and Trends since 1985. Med J Aust, 184, 6-10.
[4]	Fransen, M., Karahalios, A., Sharma, N., English, D.R., Giles, G.G. and Sinclair, R.D. (2010) Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Australia. Med J Aust, 197, 565-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja12.10654
[5]	Harrison, S.L. (2001) Sun Exposure and the Epidemiology of Melanoma and Melanocytic Nevi. In: Canyon, D.V. and Speare, R., Eds., Rural and Remote Environmental Health, Vol. I, Australasian College Trop Med, Townsville, 99-113.
[6]	Bauer, J. and Garbe, C. (2003) Acquired Melanocytic Nevi as Risk Factor for Melanoma Development. A Comprehensive Re-view of Epidemiological Data. Pigment Cell Res, 3, 297-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0749.2003.00047.x
[7]	Harrison, S.L., Büttner, P.G. and MacLennan, R. (1999) Body Site Distribution of Melanocytic Nevi in Young Australian Children. Arch Dermatol, 135, 47-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.135.1.47
[8]	Harrison, S.L., MacLennan, R., Speare, R. and Wronski, I. (1994) Sun Exposure and Melanocytic Naevi in Young Australian Children. The Lancet, 344, 1529-1532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90348-4
[9]	Armstrong, B.K., de Klerk, N.H. and Holman, C.D.J. (1986) Etiology of Common Acquired Melanocytic Nevi: Constitutional Variables, Sun Exposure, and Diet. J Natl Cancer Inst, 77, 329-335.
[10]	Holman, C.D.J. and Armstrong, B.K. (1984) Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma and Indicators of Total Accumulated Exposure to the Sun: An Analysis Separating Histogenic Types. J Natl Cancer Inst, 73, 75-82.
[11]	Kelly, J.W., Rivers, J.K., MacLennan, R., Harrison, S.L., Lewis, A.E. and Tate, B.J. (1994) Sunlight: A Major Factor Associated with the Development of Melanocytic Naevi in Australian Schoolchildren. J Am Acad Dermatol, 30, 40-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(94)70005-2
[12]	Harrison, S.L., MacKie, R.M., and MacLennan, R. (2000) Development of Melanocytic Nevi in the First 3 Years of Life. J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 1436-1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.17.1436
[13]	Turner, D. and Harrison, S.L. (2014) Sun-Protection Provided by Regulation School Uniforms in Australian Schools: An Opportunity to Improve Personal Sun-protection During Childhood. Photochem Photobiol, 90, 1439-1445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/php.12312
[14]	Harrison, S.L., Buettner, P.G. and MacLennan, R. (2005) The North Queensland Sun-Safe Clothing Study: Design and Baseline Results of a Randomized Trial to Determine the Effective-ness of Sun-Protective Clothing in Preventing Melanocytic Nevi. Am J Epidemiol, 161, 536-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi081
[15]	Gambichler, T., Dissel, M., Altmeyer, P. and Rotterdam, S. (2009) Evalu-ation of Sun Awareness with an Emphasis on Ultraviolet Protection by Clothing: A Survey of Adults in Western Ger-many. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 24, 155-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03368.x
[16]	Smith, A., Harrison, S.L., Nowak, M., Buettner, P. and MacLennan, R. (2013) Changes in the Pattern of Sun-Exposure and Sun-Protection in Young Children from Tropical Australia. J Am Acad Dermatol, 68, 774-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.057
[17]	Harrison, S.L. (2010) Sun-Safe Clothing Helps to Prevent the Development of Pigmented Moles—Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial in Young Australian Children. Annals ACTM, 11, 49-50.
[18]	Gies, P. and McLennan, A. (2012) Ready to Wear Sun Protection. http://skincancer.epubxp.com/i/65757-may-2012/47
[19]	Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand (1996) AS/NZS 4399:1996 Sun Protective Clothing—Evaluation and Classification. Standards Australia, Sydney and Stan-dards New Zealand, Wellington.
[20]	Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (2015) ARPANSA Fact Sheet—Sun Protection Using Clothing. http://www.arpansa.gov.au/pubs/factsheets/SunProtectionUsingClothing.pdf
[21]	Standards Australia (2015) DR AS/NZS 4399:2015 Sun Protective Clothing—Evaluation and Classification Revision of AS/NZ 4399:1996. https://sapc.standards.org.au/sapc/public/listOpenCommentingPublication.action
[22]	World Health Organisa-tion (2015) WHO Child Growth Standards—Length for Age Birth to 2 Years (Percentiles). http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/height_for_age/en/
[23]	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) Height for Age 2 - 18 Year. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts
[24]	MATLAB Software Release 2013 (2013) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.