Buddhism and Subjective Wellbeing: Do Self-Esteem, Optimism and  Perceived Control Play a Role?

Lufanna Ching-Han Lai

doi:10.4236/jss.2015.39001

Home > Journals > Business & Economics | Social Sciences & Humanities > JSS

Open Journal of Social Sciences > Vol.3 No.9, September 2015

Buddhism and Subjective Wellbeing: Do Self-Esteem, Optimism and Perceived Control Play a Role? ()

Lufanna Ching-Han Lai

School of Psychology, Gratia Christian College, Hong Kong, China.

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2015.39001 PDF HTML XML 4,229 Downloads 4,828 Views Citations

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between Buddhism and subjective wellbeing within the theoretical framework of a revised homeostatic model of subjective wellbeing (SWB). This model integrates the affective (homeostatically protected mood: content, happy and excited), cognitive (self-esteem, optimism and perceived control: primary control and secondary control) and experiential factors in relating to SWB. Given that the religious doctrine of Buddhism advocates selflessness and self-attained liberation from suffering, it is predicted that, among the cognitive factors, primary control and optimism will predict more significant SWB variance beyond the other homeostatic model factors than self-esteem. Additionally, compared with those without religious belief, the Buddhists would be higher in SWB, primary control and optimism, but lower in self-es- teem. Chinese samples were drawn in Hong Kong comprising 153 Buddhists and 240 participants without religious belief. Through the use of questionnaire, it was found that, quite contrary to prediction, secondary control and self-esteem explained significant SWB variance for the Buddhists while none was provided by primary control and optimism. Also, no significant intergroup difference was found on SWB and all cognitive factors. The results were discussed in terms of difficulty in the eradication of egocentric mentality.

Keywords

Subjective Wellbeing, Buddhism, Self-Esteem, Optimism, Primary Control

Share and Cite:

Lai, L. (2015) Buddhism and Subjective Wellbeing: Do Self-Esteem, Optimism and Perceived Control Play a Role?. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 1-7. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.39001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Gethin, R. (1998) The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford University Press, New York.
[2]	Lopez, D.S. (2001) Buddhism: An Introduction and Guide. Penguin Press, London.
[3]	Gyatso, G.K. (1992) Introduction to Buddhism. Tharpa Publications, London.
[4]	Keown, D. (1996) Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York.
[5]	Lai, L.C.H. and Cummins, R.A. (2013) The Contribution of Job and Partner Satisfaction to the Homeostatic Defense of Subjective Wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 111, 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9991-6
[6]	Campbell, A., Converse, P.E. and Rodgers, W.L. (1976) The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
[7]	Cummins, R.A., Gullone, E. and Lau, A.L.D. (2002) A Model of Subjective Well-Being Homeostasis: The Role of Personality. The Universality of Subjective Well-Being Indicators, 7-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0271-4_3
[8]	Diener, E. (2000) Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
[9]	Cook, V. (2002) A New Direction for Quality of Life: Evaluating the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale as a Measure of Satisfaction and Depression. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne.
[10]	Cummins, R.A. (2003) Normative Life Satisfaction: Measurement Issues and a Homeostatic Model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024712527648
[11]	Cummins, R.A., Lau, A.L.D., Mellor, D. and Stokes, M.A. (2009) Encouraging Governments to Enhance the Happiness of Their Nation: Step 1: Understand Subjective Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 91, 23-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9324-6
[12]	Cummins, R.A. (1995) On the Trail of the Gold Standard for Subjective Well-Being. Social Research Indicators, 35, 179-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01079026
[13]	Cummins, R.A. (1998) The Second Approximation to an International Standard for Life Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006831107052
[14]	Lai, L.C.H., Cummins, R.A. and Lau, A.L.D. (2013) Cross-Cultural Differences in Subjective Wellbeing: Cultural Response Bias as an Explanation. Social Indicators Re-search, 114, 607-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0164-z
[15]	Russell, J.A. (2003) Core Affect and the Psy-chological Construction of Emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
[16]	Cummins, R.A. (2010) Subjective Wellbeing, Homeostatically Protected Mood and Depression: A Synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0
[17]	Davern, M., Cummins, R.A. and Stokes, M. (2007) Subjective Well-Being as an Affective/Cognitive Construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1
[18]	Blore, J.D., Stokes, M.A., Mellor, D., Firth, L. and Cummins, R.A. (2011) Comparing Multiple Discrepancies Theory to Affective Models of Subjective Wellbeing. Social Indicators Re-search, 100, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2
[19]	Tomyn, A.J. and Cummins, R.A. (2011) Subjective Wellbeing and Homeostatically Protected Mood: Theory Validation with Adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 897-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5
[20]	Cummins, R.A. and Wooden, M. (2014) Personal Resilience in Times of Crisis: The Implications of SWB Homeostasis and Set-Points. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 223-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9481-4
[21]	Cummins, R.A. and Nistico, H. (2002) Maintaining Life Satisfaction: The Role of Positive Cognitive Bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015678915305
[22]	Weisz, J.R., Rothbaum, F.M. and Blackburn, T.C. (1984) Standing out and Standing in: The Psychology of Control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39, 955-969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.955
[23]	Mitchell, D.W. (2002) Buddhism: Introducing the Buddhist Experience. Oxford University Press, New York.
[24]	Peterson, C. (2000) The Future of Optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.44
[25]	Rosenberg, M. (1979) Conceiving the Self. Basic Books, New York.
[26]	Piccolo, R.F., Judge, T.A., Takahashi, K., Watanabe, N. and Locke, E.A. (2005) Core Self-Evaluations in Japan: Relative Effects on Job Satisfaction, Life Satisfaction, and Happiness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 965-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.358
[27]	Ralph, A., Merralls, L., Hart, L., Porter, J.S. and Tan Su-Neo, A. (1995) Peer Interactions, Self-Concept, Locus of Control, and Avoidance of Social Situations of Early Adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 110-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049539508257509
[28]	Tong, Y. and Song, S. (2004) A Study on General Self-Efficacy and Subjective Well-Being of Low SES College Students in a Chinese University. College Student Journal, 38, 637-643.
[29]	Census and Statistics Department (2006) 2006 Population By-Census-Summary Results. Hong Kong Government Printer, Hong Kong.
[30]	International Wellbeing Group (2006) Personal Wellbeing Index-Adult (PWI-A).
[31]	Chambers, S., Hollway, J., Parsons, E-R. and Wallage, C. (2003) Perceived Control and Wellbeing. 5th Australian Conference on Quality of Life, Melbourne.
[32]	Carver, C.S. and Scheier, M. (2003) Optimism. In: Lopez, S.J. and Sydner, C.R., Eds., Positive Psychological Assessment: Handbook of Models and Measures. American Psychological Association, Washington DC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10612-005