Pre-Service Teachers’ Comments toward Official Teacher Selection System (Civil Servant Selection Examination, KPSS) in Turkey: A Qualitative Analysis

Ilker Ugulu; Nurettin Yorek

doi:10.4236/jss.2015.39025

Home > Journals > Business & Economics | Social Sciences & Humanities > JSS

Open Journal of Social Sciences > Vol.3 No.9, September 2015

Pre-Service Teachers’ Comments toward Official Teacher Selection System (Civil Servant Selection Examination, KPSS) in Turkey: A Qualitative Analysis ()

Ilker Ugulu, Nurettin Yorek^*

Faculty of Education, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2015.39025 PDF HTML XML 2,685 Downloads 3,421 Views Citations

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the opinions of the pre-service teachers toward teacher selection system and civil servant selection exam (KPSS). In this study, qualitative re-search methods and semi-structured interviews were used and researcher-made questionnaires containing open-ended questions were administered. The study group consists of 100 pre-service teachers from four departments (elementary education, biology education, Turkish education, and mathematics education) in Balikesir University (in western Turkey). Pre-service teachers reported that KPSS was not an appropriate examination to select a qualified teacher. Pre-service teachers suggest that both an oral and written examination process should be applied instead of KPSS.

Keywords

Teacher Selection, Pre-Service Teachers, Opinion, Qualitative Analysis

Share and Cite:

Ugulu, I. and Yorek, N. (2015) Pre-Service Teachers’ Comments toward Official Teacher Selection System (Civil Servant Selection Examination, KPSS) in Turkey: A Qualitative Analysis. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 182-189. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.39025.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Gundogdu, K., &CCEDIL;Imen, N. and Turan, S. (2008) OgretmenAdaylarininKamuPersonelISe&ccedIl;meSinavina (KPSS) IlIskInGOruslerI.(Teachers CandIdates’ OpInIons toward CIvIl Servant SelectIon Exam.)AhIEvranUnIversItesIKirsehIrEgItImFakultesIDergIsI (KEFAD), 9, 35-43.
[2]	Erden, M. (2005) OgretmenlIkmeslegInegIrIs.(IntroductIon to TeachIng ProfessIon.)AlkimYayinlari,Istanbul.
[3]	U&ccedIl;an, A. (2007) TurkIye’deOgretmenlIkmeslegInIntarIh&ccedIl;esI.(HIstory of TeachIng ProfessIon In Turkey.) http://www.ogretmen.Info/ogretmenlIk_tarIhce_.asp
[4]	Tan, H. (1989) TurkEgItImIndeKalIteSorunu.(QualIty Problems In TurkIsh EducatIon System.)M.U. EgItImBIlImlerIDergIsI, 1, 129-142.
[5]	MIllIEgItImBakanligi (MInIstry of EducatIon) (1982) OgretmenYetIstIrmedeKoordInasyon.(CoordInatIon In Teachers’ EducatIon.)MEB yayinlari, Ankara.
[6]	Akyuz, Y. (1999) TurkEgItImTarIhI. (HIstory of TurkIsh EducatIon System.)KulturKolejIYayinlari Istanbul, Turkey.
[7]	SemercI, N. and Ozer, B. (2005) TezsIzyukseklIsansveunIversIte son sinifOgrencIlerInIn KPSS sinavinayOnelIkalgilari.(Graduate and Undergraduate Students’ PerceptIon toward CIvIl Servant SelectIon Exam.)XIV. EgItImBIlImlerIKongresI’ndesOzluolaraksunulanbIldIrI.PamukkaleUnIversItesI, DenIzlI.
[8]	DIlekmen, M., Ercoskun, M.H. and Nal&ccedIl;aci, A. (2005) OgretmenAdaylarininAkademIkve KPSS Basarilarinin&CCEDIL;esItlIDegIskenlerA&ccedIl;isindanIncelenmesI.(InvestIgatIon on AcademIc and SelectIon Exam AchIevement of Teachers CandIdates.)KazimKarabekIrEgItImFakultesIDergIsI, 11, 304-315.
[9]	Eraslan, L. (2006) OgretmenlIkMeslegIneGIrIsteKamuPersonelISe&ccedIl;meSinavi (KPSS) YOntemInInDegerlendIrIl- mesI.(EvaluatIon of CIvIl Servant SelectIon Exam In EnterIng of TeachIng ProfessIon.)UluslararasiInsanBIlImlerIDergIsI, 1, 1-31.
[10]	Kara&ccedIl;anta, H. (2009) OgretmenAdaylariI&ccedIl;InKamuPersonelISe&ccedIl;meSinaviKaygiOl&ccedIl;egInInGelIstIrIlmesI.(Ge&ccedIl;erlIkveguvenIrlIk&ccedIl;alismasi.)(Development of CIvIl Servant SelectIon Exam AnxIety Scale and It’s RelIabIlIty and ValIdIty.) GazIUnIversItesIEndustrIyelSanatlarEgItImFakultesIDergIsI, 25, 50-57.
[11]	Karaca, E. (2011) OgretmenAdaylarininKamuPersonelISe&ccedIl;meSinavi’na (KPSS) YOnelIkTutumlari. (Teachers CandIdates’ PerceptIons toward CIvIl Servant SelectIon ExamInatIon.)AkademIkBakisDergIsI, 23, 1-18.
[12]	Ol&ccedIl;meSe&ccedIl;meveYerlestIrmeMerkezI(EvaluatIon, SelectIon and Placement Center) OSYM (2015)CIvIl Servant SelectIon Exam GuIde. http://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2015/KPSS/KPSSLISANSKILAVUZU20150522.pdf
[13]	Yildirim, A. andSImsek, H. (2005) SosyalBIlImlerdeNItelUrastirmaYOntemlerI.(QualItatIve Research Methods In SocIal ScIences.)Se&ccedIl;kIn Ankara, Turkey.
[14]	SezgIn, F. and Duran, E. (2011) KamuPersonelISe&ccedIl;meSinavi’nin (KPSS) OgretmenAdaylarininAkademIkveSosyalYasantilarinaYansimalari. (Effects of CIvIl Servant SelectIon Exam on AcademIc and SocIal LIves of Teachers CandIdates.) TSA, 15, 9-22.
[15]	Nartgun, S.S. (2008)AdayOgretmenlerInGOzuyleMIllîEgItImBakanliginaBagliEgItImKurumlarinaOgretmenAtamaEsaslari.(Teachers’ PoInt of VIews about Teachers SelectIon System of MInIstry of EducatIon In Turkey.)AbantIzzetBaysalUnIversItesIEgItImFakultesIDergIsI, 8, 47-58.
[16]	Yilmaz, K. (2010) SosyalBIlgIlerEgItImIndekISorunlarve&CCEDIL;OzumOnerIlerI: OgretImElemanlarininGOruslerI. (Problems and RecommendatIons toward SocIal ScIences EducatIon: Lecturers’ PoInt of VIews.) TurkEgItImBIlImlerIDergIsI, 8, 839-867.
[17]	DIlaver, H. (1996) TurkIye’deOgretmenIstIhdaminindunu, bugunuveyarini: EgItImImIzebakislar. (Teachers’ Employments In Turkey: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.) KulturKolejIEgItImVakfiYayinlari. Istanbul, Turkey.
[18]	DemIr, M.C. andGur, H. (2000) TurkIye, IngIltereveFransa’daIseAlinma, &CCEDIL;alismaHayativeUcretPolItIkalariA&ccedIl;isindanOgretmenInDurumu. (Employment, Salary and WorkIng CondItIons of Teachers In Turkey, England and France.) II. UlusalOgretmenYetIstIrmeSempozyumu, &CCEDIL;anakkale, 10-12 Mayis.