Factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Elective Science Courses: A Case Study from the American University of Sharjah

Fatin Samara

doi:10.4236/jss.2015.38010

Home > Journals > Business & Economics | Social Sciences & Humanities > JSS

JSS> Vol.3 No.8, August 2015

Share This Article:

Factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Elective Science Courses: A Case Study from the American University of Sharjah ()

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size:270KB) PP. 93-99

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2015.38010 3,132 Downloads 3,935 Views Citations

Author(s) Leave a comment

Fatin Samara^*

Affiliation(s)

American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

ABSTRACT

Scientific studies in higher education are becoming an increasing matter of discussion. The Ameri- can University of Sharjah (AUS) encourages the scientific literacy of students who are not enrolled in science or engineering majors by including two required science courses in the curriculum. The courses of choice include biology, chemistry, environmental sciences, astronomy and physics. This study investigates the factors that contribute to students’ choice when selecting science courses at AUS. A survey comprised of open-ended questions as well as quantitative enquiries was administered to students enrolled in environmental science (ENV 100), aiming to investigate the main reason behind their choice. The results of this two year study showed significantly positive attitudes toward the course contents and the benefit of the course towards their future careers. Furthermore, it reveals that students are highly influenced by previous experiences with subjects, professors’ popularity, peer recommendation, their abilities in memorization, and skills in math. The study reveals that the main concern for students is related to the high amount of information and details that the course content covers. In addition, the possibility of obtaining a higher grade was also studied by observing the grade point average (GPA) for science courses over a period of four years. Nonetheless, the main factor for course choice was their genuine interest for the subject matter, which is this case study, was the environmental studies course.

KEYWORDS

Environmental Sciences, General Education Courses, Course Choice, United Arab Emirates, Higher Education

Cite this paper

Samara, F. (2015) Factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Elective Science Courses: A Case Study from the American University of Sharjah. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 93-99. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.38010.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Sabot, R. and Wakeman-Linn, J. (1991) Grade Inflation and Course Choice. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 159-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.159

[2]	Leonard, W.H. (2000) How Do College Students Best Learn Science? Journal of Collective Science Teaching, 29, 385- 388.

[3]	Prather, E.E., Slater, T.F., Adams, J.P., Bailey, J.M., Jones, L.V. and Dostal, J.A. (2005) Research on a Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Teaching Introductory Astronomy for Non-Science Majors. The Astronomy Education, 2, 122-136.

[4]	Cortese, D.A. (2003) The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 31, 15-22.

[5]	Whitfield, R.C. (1980) Educational Research & Science Teaching. School Science Review, 60, 411-430.

[6]	Crawley, F.E. and Black, C.B. (1992) Causal Modelling of Secondary Science Students intentions to Enroll in Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 585-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290607

[7]	Havard, N. (1996) Student Attitudes to Studying A-Level Sciences. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 321-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/002

[8]	Hendley, D., Parkinson, J., Stables, A. and Tanner, H. (1995) Gender Differences in Pupil Attitudes to the National Curriculum Foundation Subjects of English, Mathematics. Educational studies, 21, 85-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305569950210107

[9]	Stables, A., Hendley, D. and Stables, S. (1996) Pupils’ Subject Preferences at Key Stage 3 in South Wales. Educational Studies, 22, 177-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305569960220204

[10]	Bailey, J.M., Jones, L.V. and Slater, T.F. (2003) How Astronomers View Their Role as Instructors. The 126th Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Austin.

[11]	McDermott, L.C. and Redish, E.F. (1999) Resource Letter PER-1: Physics Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 67, 755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.19122

[12]	Tobias, S. (1990) They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Research Corporation, Tucson.

[13]	DeBoer, G.E. (2000) Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L

[14]	American University of Sharjah (2013-2014) Undergraduate Catalogue, Sharjah, 148.

[15]	Osborne, J., Simon, S. and Collins, S. (2003) Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications. International Journal of Science, 25, 1049-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

[16]	Samaras, A.P., Howard, B.J. and Wende, C. (2000) Kyoto Redoux: Assessment of an Environmental Science Collaborative Learning Project for Undergraduate, Non-Science Majors. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 26-47.