Dependence on Creativity Characteristics as Observed during the Implementation of  Laboratory Activities

Lilia Ellany Mohtar; Lilia Halim; Seth Sulaiman

doi:10.4236/ce.2015.611115

Home > Journals > Social Sciences & Humanities > CE

Creative Education > Vol.6 No.11, June 2015

Dependence on Creativity Characteristics as Observed during the Implementation of Laboratory Activities ()

Lilia Ellany Mohtar¹, Lilia Halim¹, Seth Sulaiman²

¹Faculty of Education, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia..
²Faculty of Education, University Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2015.611115 PDF HTML XML 4,040 Downloads 4,668 Views Citations

Abstract

A person’s creativity can be elicited through observations made upon his/her behaviour and personality characteristics which are in turn termed as creativity characteristics. Physics Practical Work (PPW) is a form of instruction which is intended to foster a creative culture in schools in which large numbers of students can be engaged in an environment where creativity flourishes. However, there are criticisms leveled against the effectiveness of PPW in developing creativity among students as indicated by the emergence of the creativity characteristics. Besides being involved in PPW as a requirement of the course SPN3231, 12 respondents of the study comprising final year undergraduate physics education students participated in a Physics Innovative Project (PIP) whereby they had to modify or devise an alternative method(s) for teaching physics topics which they had earlier conducted in PPW. Seven dominant creativity characteristics constructs were incorporated into a well-validated Structured Interview Checklist (27 items) and an Observation Checklist (37 items). All data were analysed using the Interactive Qualitative Analysis Model by Miles and Huberman (1994). Results of the study indicated that PIP fostered frequent emergence of creativity characteristics much better as compared to PPW.

Keywords

Creative Learning Environment, Creativity Characteristics, Physics Practical Work, Physics Innovative Project

Share and Cite:

Mohtar, L. , Halim, L. and Sulaiman, S. (2015) Dependence on Creativity Characteristics as Observed during the Implementation of Laboratory Activities. Creative Education, 6, 1168-1177. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.611115.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Aboukinane, C. (2007). A Qualitative Study of Creative Thinking Using Experiential. Ph.D. Thesis, College Station: Texas A&M University.
[2]	Abu, H. H. (2004). Status MakmaldanPelaksanaan Amali Fizik Di Sekolah-Sekolah Daerah Kuala Pilah, JelebudanJempol (KPJJ). Project Report, Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
[3]	Abu, H. H. (2012). Development of an Enriched Method for Introductory Physics Laboratory Work and Its Effects on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Ph.D. Thesis, Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
[4]	Anderson, H. H. (1970). Creativity and Its Cultivation. Michigan: Penguin Books.
[5]	Azhar, A. H., Mohd, K. B., Mohammad, F. O., & Othman A. K. (2006). Reka Cipta & Inovasi Dalam Perspektif Kreativiti. Johor Bahru: Penerbit UTM.
[6]	Cheng, V. M. Y. (2004). Developing Physics Learning Activities for Fostering Student Creativity in Hong Kong. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 5, 1-15.
[7]	Chua, Y. P. (2006). KaedahdanStatistikPenyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill.
[8]	Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. C. P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publication.
[9]	Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Recognizing and Fostering Creativity in Technological Design Education. International Journal Technology Design Education, 20, 345-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9089-5
[10]	Dacey, S. J. (1985). Fundamentals of Creative Thinking. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[11]	Forest, J., & Faucheux, M. (2011). Stimulating Creative Rationality to Stimulate Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20, 207-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00603.x
[12]	Foursight Consulting Group Inc. (2004). How Would You Rate Your Creativity? http://www.foursightconsulting.com
[13]	Gorshunova, N. K., Medvedev, N. V., & Razdorskaya, O. V. (2014). The Significance of High School Teacher’s Creativity for Innovation Pedagogical Practice. Journal of International Scientific Publications, 12, 607-614.
[14]	Haigh, M., France, B., & Forret, M. (2005). Is “Doing Science” in New Zealand Classrooms an Expression of Scientific Inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, 27, 215-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000276730
[15]	Hamza, M. K., & Griffith, K. G. (2006). Fostering Problem Solving and Creative Thinking in the Classroom: Cultivating a Creative Mind! National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal-Electronic, 19, 1-30.
[16]	Hanif, M., Sneddon, P. H., Al-Ahmadi, F. M., & Reid, N. (2009). The Perceptions, Views and Opinions of University Students about Physics Learning during Undergraduate Laboratory Work. European Journal of Physics, 30, 85-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/30/1/009
[17]	Haryanti, M. A. (2009). Ketekunan, Kreativiti dan Inovasi Di Kalangan Pelajar UTHM. M.Ed Thesis, Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
[18]	Hong, M., & Kang, N. H. (2009). South Korean and the US Secondary School Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Creativity and Teaching for Creativity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 821-843.
[19]	Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A Scientific Creativity Test for Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 389-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
[20]	Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). LaporanTahunanPelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: KPM.
[21]	Kim, M., & Chin, C. (2011). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views on Practical Work with Inquiry Orientation in Textbook-Oriented Science Classrooms. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6, 23-37.
[22]	Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Selangor: McGraw-Hill.
[23]	Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Baverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publication.
[24]	Mohamad, M., & Nasruddin, Y. (2008). Halangan-HalanganKepada Usaha Memupuk Kreativiti Di Kalangan Pelajar. Proceeding from the National Conference on Soft Skill and Social Well-Being. 18-19 August 2008, Mahkota Hotel Melaka: Pusat Bahasa dan Pembangunan Insan, UTeM.
[25]	Mohtar, L. E. (2012). Ciri-CiriKreativitiBakal Guru FizikDalamLatihanAmaliFizik Dan ProjekInovasiFizik. M.Ed. Dissertation, Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
[26]	Mohtar, L. E. (2013). Comparison between Characteristics of Creativity in Physics Practical Work and Physics Innovative Project among Pre-Service Physics Teacher. Jurnal Teknologi, 63, 85-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2015
[27]	Nurzatulshima, K., Halim, L., Osman, K., & T. Subahan, M. M. (2009). Pengurusan Penglibatan Pelajar dalam Amali Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 34, 205-217.
[28]	Park, J. (2012). Developing the Format and Samples of Teaching Materials for Scientific Creativity in the Ordinary Science Curriculum-Including Teachers’ Practice and Reflection. Journal of a Korean Association for Science Education, 32, 446-466.
[29]	Pedersen, E. L., & Burton, K. L. (2009). A Concept Analysis of Creativity: Uses of Creativity in Selected Design Journals. Journal of Interior Design, 35, 15-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01025.x
[30]	Rabari, J. A., Indoshi, F. C., & Omusonga, T. O. (2011). Correlates of Divergent Thinking among Secondary School Physics Students. International Research Journals, 2, 982-996.
[31]	Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2013). Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT): A New Measure of Scientific Creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55, 316-329.
[32]	Schwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Enfield, M., & Tsurusaki, B. (2008). Helping Elementary Preservice Teachers Learn to Use Curriculum Materials for Effective Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 92, 345-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20243
[33]	Simonton, K. D. (2012). Teaching Creativity: Current Findings, Trends and Controversies in the Psychology of Creativity. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 217-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628312450444
[34]	Sneddon, P. H., Slaughter, K. A., & Reid, N. (2009). Perceptions, Views and Opinions of University Students about Physics Learning during Practical Work at School. European Journal of Physics, 30, 1119-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/30/5/018
[35]	Sriraman, B. (2004). The Characteristics of Mathematical Creativity.The Mathematics Educator, 14, 19-34.
[36]	Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why Fly? A Philosophy of Creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
[37]	Torrance, P. E. (1970). Creative Learning and Teaching. New York: Harper and Row.
[38]	Treffinger, D. J., Isaken, S. G., & Firestein, R. L. (1992). Theoretical Perspectives on Creative Learning and Its Facilitation: An Overview. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 17, 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1983.tb00970.x
[39]	Vidal, R. V. V. (2010). Creative Problem Solving: An Applied University Course. Pesquisa Operacional, 30, 405-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-74382010000200009
[40]	Villalba, E. (2008). On Creativity: Toward an Understanding of Creativity and its Measurements. Luxembourg: European Communities.
[41]	Wood, C. (2006). The Development of Creative Problem Solving in Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 96-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90003H
[42]	Yoon, H. G. (2008). Elementary Teachers’ Dilemmas of Teaching Science Practical Work. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27, 102-116.
[43]	Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2009). Collaborative Reflection Collaborative Reflection through Dilemma Cases of Science Practical Work during Practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 283-301.