The Fallacy of Religious Fundamentalism and Its Ontological Boomerang Effect; An African Worldview

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2015.52018   PDF   HTML     4,108 Downloads   4,768 Views  

Abstract

That Adam exists in the mind of man, creates a belief system that lacks or defies the principle directives of complementary reflection in the right direction which is rooted in the very idea of religious fundamentalism which envelopes the Existential Phenomenological Ontology of Human Predicament. This fact is reflected in the un-mutual and the resulting destabilization in some organized practices among the religious sector in the world. Consequently, there is an ontological boomerang effect. This paper takes a complementary reflection on the ontological boomerang effect of religious fundamentalism as it defies existence in African world view. Put simply, egbe bere ugo bere, onye sina ibeya ebena, ukwu kwayai.

Share and Cite:

 , E. and Daniel, P. (2015) The Fallacy of Religious Fundamentalism and Its Ontological Boomerang Effect; An African Worldview. Open Journal of Philosophy, 5, 156-162. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2015.52018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Agi, S. P. I. (1996). Holy Violence (p. 31). Makurdi: Ehi Publishers.
[2] Asuzu, I. I. (2004). The Methods and Principles of Complementary Reflection in and Beyond African Philosophy (pp. 110-118). Calabar: UNICAL Press.
[3] Asuzu, I. I. (2007). Ibuanyidanda (pp. 39, 393, 396). Livingston: Transaction Publishers.
[4] BBC (2009). Doha Debate, September 8th, 2009.
[5] Davidson, B. (1984). The Story of Africa (p. 57). London: Mitchell Bentley Publisher.
[6] Fisher & Amadiyya (1963). A Study in Contemporary Islam on West African Coast (p. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[7] Mertein, U. (1980). The New Vitality of Islam in Black Africa and Its Pastoral Implications (pp. 8, 12). Kanistein: Kim/Oph.
[8] Mundi, V. (1987). N. 109, Brussels (p. 5).
[9] Oyedola, D. A. (1991). Religious Obstacles to Development. Orita: Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies, xxiii, 37, 43.
[10] Webster (2004). The New Webster’s Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Language Encyclopedic Edition (p. 512). USA: Trend int’l Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.