New Interpretations about Clonal Architecture for the Sour Pitaya (Stenocereus gummosus, Cactaceae), Arising from Microsatellite Markers of de novo Isolation and Characterization

DOI: 10.4236/ojgen.2015.51001    4,561 Downloads   5,108 Views   Citations


The use of molecular markers has improved the ecological and evolutionary research in the case of clonal reproduction species, allowing the identification of boundaries among clonal modules (ramets), genetic individuals (genets), and populations. Microsatellite markers were developed for Stenocereus gummosus, a columnar cactus with both sexual and clonal reproduction which is distributed in the Sonoran Desert, Mexico. 454-Pyrosequencing reads were analyzed to detect microsatellite markers. Forty primer pairs were screened to look for polymorphism. Nine loci were genotyped for two S. gummosus localities. Sampling strategy was intended to avoid collecting a genetic individual more than once, considering that clonal architecture for this cactus was previously deduced as clumped. Polymorphic loci exhibited low allele count, ranging from 2 - 7 (mean of 3.78 ± 0.62 SE); mean heterozygosity values were 0.221 and 0.234 HO and 0.408 and 0.306 HE, with FIS of 0.383 and 0.299, for peninsular and continental localities respectively. Unexpectedly, some multilocus genotypes were found repeated within locality, which were assumed as clones since data was evaluated as sufficient (clonal richness R of 0.966 and 0.897). These results were different from those previously reported: the distribution of clones might as well be intermingled, having a minimum ramet dispersion distance of 30 m. This characteristic was also consistent with the recent colonization proposed for this and other arid lands plants. A wider genetic neighborhood, due to clone dispersion might affect diversity indexes while increasing the chance of geitonogamy and mating among relatives. The markers isolation and its population characterization allowed addressing new questions about S. gummosus ecology, clonal reproduction and reproductive biology.

Cite this paper

Garza, O. , de la Luz, J. , Favela Lara, S. and García de León, F. (2015) New Interpretations about Clonal Architecture for the Sour Pitaya (Stenocereus gummosus, Cactaceae), Arising from Microsatellite Markers of de novo Isolation and Characterization. Open Journal of Genetics, 5, 1-11. doi: 10.4236/ojgen.2015.51001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Mandujano, M.C. (2007) La clonalidad y sus efectos en la biología de poblaciones. In: Eguiarte, L.E., Sousa, V. and Aguirre, X., Eds., Ecología Molecular, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, SEMARNAT, México Distrito Federal, México, 215-250.
[2] Arnaud-Haond, S., Alberto, F., Teixeira, S., Procaccini, G., Serrão, E.A. and Duarte, C.M. (2005) Assessing Genetic Diversity in Clonal Organisms: Low Diversity or Low Resolution? Combining Power and Cost Effi-ciency in Selecting Markers. Journal of Heredity, 96, 434-440.
[3] Pimienta-Barrios, E. and del Castillo, R.F. (2002) Reproductive Biology. In: Nobel, P.S., Ed., Cacti: Biology and Uses, University of California Press, Berkeley, 75-90.
[4] Carrillo-Angeles, I.G., Mandujano, M.C. and Golubov, J. (2011) Influences of the Genetic Neighborhood on Ramet Reproductive Success in a Clonal Desert Cactus. Population Ecology, 53, 449-458.
[5] Dubrovsky, J.G. and North, G.B. (2002) Root Structure and Function. In: Nobel, P.S., Ed., Cacti: Biology and Uses, University of California Press, Berkeley, 41-56.
[6] Gibson, A.C. (1989) The Systematics and Evolution of the Subtribe Stenocereinae 7. The Macharocerei of Stenocereus. Cactus and Succulent Journal, 61, 104-112.
[7] Parker, K.C. and Hamrick, J.L. (1992) Genetic Diversity and Clonal Structure in a Columnar Cactus, Lophocereus schottii. American Journal of Botany, 79, 86-96.
[8] León de La Luz, J.L., Domínguez-Cadena, R., Cruz-Estrada, M. and Rodríguez-Estrella, R. (1995) Reproductive Phenology of Stenocereus gummosus (Engelm.) Gibson & Horak. Impli-cations for Its Cultivation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 42, 61-67.
[9] León de La Luz, J.L. and Domínguez-Cadena, R. (1991) Evaluación de la reproducción por semilla de la Pitahaya agria (Stenocereus gummosus) en Baja California Sur, México. Acta Botánica Mexicana, 14, 75-87.
[10] Clark-Tapia, R., Mandujano, M.C., Valverde, T., Mendoza, A. and Molina-Freaner, F. (2005) How Important Is Clonal Recruitment for Population Maintenance in Rare Plant Species?: The Case of the Narrow Endemic Cactus, Stenocereus eruca, in Baja California, México. Biological Conservation, 124, 123-132.
[11] Vázquez-Sánchez, M., Terrazas, T. and Arias, S. (2012) El hábito y la forma de crecimiento en la tribu Cacteae (Cactaceae, Cactoideae). Botanical Sciences, 2, 97-108.
[12] Turner, R.M., Bowers, J.E. and Burgess, T.L. (1995) Sonoran Desert Plants: An Ecological Atlas. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 504.
[13] Clark-Tapia, R. and Molina-Freaner, F. (2003) The Genetic Structure of a Columnar Cactus with a Disjunct Distribution: Stenocereus gummosus in the Sonoran Desert. Heredity, 90, 443-450.
[14] Molina Freaner, F. and Clark-Tapia, R. (2005) Clonal Diversity and Allelic Relationships between Two Closely Related Species of Columnar Cacti from the Sonoran Desert: Stenocereus eruca and Stenocereus gummosus. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 166, 257-264.
[15] Dorken, M.E. and Eckert, C.G. (2001) Severely Reduced Sexual Reproduction in Northern Populations of a Clonal Plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Journal of Ecology, 89, 339-350.
[16] Charpentier, A. (2002) Consequences of Clonal Growth for Plant Mating. Evolutionary Ecology, 15, 521-530.
[17] Eckert, C.G. (2000) Contributions of Autogamy and Geitonogamy to Self-Fertilization in a Mass-Flowering, Clonal Plant. Ecology, 81, 532-542.
[18] Carrillo-Angeles, I.G. and Mandujano, M. del C. (2011) Patrones de distribución espacial en plantas clonales. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México, 89, 1-18.
[19] Loveless, M.D. and Hamrick, J.L. (1984) Ecological Determinants of Genetic Structure in Plant Populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 65-95.
[20] Clark-Tapia, R., Alfonso-Corrado, C., Eguiarte, L.E. and Molina-Freaner, F. (2005) Clonal Diversity and Distribution in Stenocereus eruca (Cactaceae), a Narrow Endemic Cactus of the Sonoran Desert. American Journal of Botany, 92, 272-278.
[21] Parra, F., Casas, A., Peñaloza-Ramírez, J.M., Cortés-Palomec, A.C., Rocha-Ramírez, V. and González-Rodríguez, A. (2010) Evolution under Domestication: Ongoing Artificial Selection and Divergence of Wild and Managed Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) Populations in the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico. Annals of Botany, 106, 483-496.
[22] Otero-Arnaiz, A., Cruse-Sanders, J., Casas, A. and Hamrick, J.L. (2004) Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellites in the Columnar Cactus: Polaskia chichipe and Cross-Species Amplification within the Tribe Pachycereeae (Cactaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 265-267.
[23] Arnaud-Haond, S., Duarte, C.M., Alberto, F. and Serrão, E.A. (2007) Standardizing Methods to Address Clonality in Population Studies. Molecular Ecology, 16, 5115-5139.
[24] de la Cruz, M., Ramirez, F. and Hernandez, H. (1997) DNA Isolation and Amplification from Cacti. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 15, 319-325.
[25] Faircloth, B.C. (2008) Msatcommander: Detection of Microsatellite Repeat Arrays and Automated, Locus-Specific Primer Design. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 92-94.
[26] Rozen, S. and Skaletsky, H. (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers. Methods in Molecular Biology, 132, 365-386.
[27] Meglécz, E., Costedoat, C., Dubut, V., Gilles, A., Malausa, T., Pech, N. and Martin, J.-F. (2010) QDD: A User-Friendly Program to Select Microsatellite Markers and Design Primers from Large Sequencing Projects. Bioinformatics, 26, 403-404.
[28] Gardner, M.G., Fitch, A.J., Bertozzi, T. and Lowe, A.J. (2011) Rise of the Machines—Recommendations for Ecologists When Using Next Generation Sequencing for Microsatellite Development. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 1093-1101.
[29] Arnaud-Haond, S. and Belkhir, K. (2007) Geneclone: A Computer Program to Analyse Genotypic Data, Test for Clonality and Describe Spatial Clonal Organization. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 15-17.
[30] Wickham, H. (2009) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York, 202.
[31] Peakall, R. and Smouse, P.E. (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population Genetic Software for Teaching and Research—An Update. Bioinformatics, 28, 2537-2539.
[32] Van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W.F., Wills, D.P.M. and Shipley, P. (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: Software for Identifying and Correcting Genotyping Errors in Microsatellite Data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 535-538.
[33] Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. and Rubin, D.B. (1977) Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, 1-38.
[34] Chapuis, M.-P. and Estoup, A. (2007) Microsatellite Null Alleles and Estimation of Population Differentiation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 621-631.
[35] Rousset, F. (2008) GENEPOP’007: A Complete Re-Implementation of the Genepop Software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 103-106.
[36] Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289-300.
[37] Abdelkrim, J., Robertson, B., Stanton, J.-A. and Gemmell, N. (2009) Fast, Cost-Effective Development of Species-Specific Microsatellite Markers by Genomic Sequencing. BioTechniques, 46, 185-192.
[38] Ellegren, H. (2004) Microsatellites: Simple Sequences with Complex Evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 435-445.
[39] Bonin, A., Bellemain, E., Bronken Eidesen, P., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C. and Taberlet, P. (2004) How to Track and Assess Genotyping Errors in Population Genetics Studies. Molecular Ecology, 13, 3261-3273.
[40] Shaw, P.W., Pierce, G.J. and Boyle, P.R. (1999) Subtle Population Structuring within a Highly Vagile Marine Invertebrate, the Veined Squid Loligo forbesi, Demonstrated with Microsatellite DNA Markers. Molecular Ecology, 8, 407-417.
[41] Hardesty, B.D., Hughes, S.L., Rodriguez, V.M. and Hawkins, J.A. (2008) Characterization of Microsatellite Loci for the Endangered Cactus Echinocactus grusonii, and Their Cross-Species Utilization. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 164-167.
[42] Hughes, S.L., Rodriguez, V.M., Hardesty, B.D., Bárce-nas Luna, R.T., Hernández, H.M., Robson, R.M. and Hawkins, J.A. (2008) Characterization of Microsatellite Loci for the Critically Endangered Cactus Ariocarpus bravoanus. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 1068-1070.
[43] Pérez, M.F., Téo, M.F., Zappi, D.C., Taylor, N.P. and Moraes, E.M. (2011) Isolation, Characterization, and Cross-Species Amplification of Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers for Pilosocereus machrisii (Cactaceae). American Journal of Botany, 98, e204-e206.
[44] Solórzano, S., Cortés-Palomec, A.C., Ibarra, A., Dávila, P. and Oyama, K. (2009) Isolation, Characterization and Cross-Amplification of Polymorphic Microsatellite Loci in the Threatened Endemic Mammillaria crucigera (Cactaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 156-158.
[45] Freeland, J.R. (2006) Molecular Ecology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, 400.
[46] Schlötterer, C. (2004) The Evolution of Molecular Markers—Just a Matter of Fashion? Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 63-69.
[47] De Meeus, T., Lehmann, L. and Balloux, F. (2006) Molecular Epidemiology of Clonal Diploids: A Quick Overview and a Short DIY (Do It Yourself) Notice. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 6, 163-170.
[48] Wong, S., Anand, M. and Bauch, C.T. (2011) Agent-Based Modelling of Clonal Plant Propagation across Space: Recapturing Fairy Rings, Power Laws and Other Phenomena. Ecological Informatics, 6, 127-135.
[49] Nason, J.D., Hamrick, J.L. and Fleming, T.H. (2002) Historical Vicariance and Postglacial Colonization Effects on the Evolution of Genetic Structure in Lophocereus, a Sonoran Desert Columnar Cactus. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56, 2214-2226.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.