Quality of Moral Judgement in the Nigerian Police Force: Assessing the Mediating Influences of Level of Education and Gender

Tobias Obiora Ozor; Chiedozie Okechukwu Okafor

doi:10.4236/ojps.2015.52008

Home > Journals > Social Sciences & Humanities > OJPS

OJPS> Vol.5 No.2, March 2015

Share This Article:

Open Access

Quality of Moral Judgement in the Nigerian Police Force: Assessing the Mediating Influences of Level of Education and Gender

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size:760KB) PP. 76-81

DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2015.52008 3,499 Downloads 3,996 Views

Author(s) Leave a comment

Tobias Obiora Ozor, Chiedozie Okechukwu Okafor

Affiliation(s)

Department of Psychology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.

ABSTRACT

The study investigated gender and level of education as factors in quality of moral judgement among the Nigerian Police Force. A total of 167 participants comprising eighty-one (81) males and eighty-six (86) females of the Nigerian Police were drawn from Central Police Station (C.P.S), Uwani, and State CID Head Quarters, all in Enugu State. A 28 items ethical moral self inventory was administered to them to measure their quality of moral judgment. A cross-sectional survey design was used, while a 2-way ANOVA Statistics was applied to analyze the data. The findings revealed no significant influence of the two independent variables (gender and level of education). Gender: F(1,163) = .02 at p < .05; level of education: F(1,163) = .35 at p < .05, and gender interaction level of education: F(1,163) = .07 at p < .05 on quality of moral judgement among the Nigerian Police. The finding was discussed in terms of its relevance to further education, and on-the-job training and counseling.

KEYWORDS

Gender, Education, Ethics, Moral Judgment

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Ozor, T. and Okafor, C. (2015) Quality of Moral Judgement in the Nigerian Police Force: Assessing the Mediating Influences of Level of Education and Gender. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 76-81. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2015.52008.

References

[1]	Bzdok, D. (2011). Parsing the Neutral Correlates of Moral Cognition; Meta-Analysis on Morality, and Theory of Mind-Originally Published Online.

[2]	Chapouthier, G. (2004). To What Extent Is Moral Judgement Natural. European Review (GB), 12, 2.

[3]	Clark, H. (1981). The Measurement of Moral Judgement. Standard Issue Scoring Manual, 2, 3.

[4]	Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgement. A Monograph for the Society of Research in Child Development. Chicago, IL: University Press.

[5]	Deigh, J. (1995). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6]	Fitts, W. (1985). Empathy in Boys with Disruptive Behaviour Disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 67-80.

[7]	Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2006). When Morality Opposes Justice. Social Justice Research, 10, 7-13.

[8]	Harenski, C. L. (2010). A Functional Imaging Investigation of Moral Deliberation and Moral Intuition. Neuroimage, 49, 21-27.

[9]	John Stone, M. J. (2008). Bioethics: A Nursing Perspective. London: Elsevier Health Science, 102-103.

[10]	Kohlberg, L. (1973). The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral Judgement. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 630-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025030

[11]	Kohlberg, L., & Charles, L. (1983). Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Response to Critics. Basel, NY: Karger.

[12]	Morgan, I. (2007). Moral Credentials and the Expression of Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.

[13]	Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (2008). Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240.

[14]	Piaget, J. (1932). The Moral Judgement of the Child. London: Kegan Paul, Trench.

[15]	Superson, A. (2009). The Moral Skeptic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195376623.003.0006

[16]	Werner, M. (2009). Ethnical Issues in Six Religious Traditions (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, 5.