[1]
|
Alexander, L. (1989). Low Value Speech. Northwestern University Law Review, 83, 547-554.
|
[2]
|
Alexander, L. (2005). Ch. 2: Freedom of Expression and Regulations that Affect Messages But are Not Enacted for That Reason. In Is There a Right of Freedom of Expression? (pp. 13-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614668.003
|
[3]
|
Benjamin, S. M. (2013). Algorithms and Speech. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1445-1494.
|
[4]
|
Calvert, C. (2013). Fringes of Free Expression: Testing the Meaning of “Speech” Amid Shifting Cultural Mores & Changing Technologies. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 22, 545-590.
|
[5]
|
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 505 U.S. 830 (1992).
|
[6]
|
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992).
|
[7]
|
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
|
[8]
|
Mt. Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977).
|
[9]
|
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).
|
[10]
|
Rubenfeld, J. (2001). The First Amendment’s Purpose. Stanford Law Review, 52, 767-832.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1229492
|
[11]
|
Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939).
|
[12]
|
United States v. O’Brien, 397 U.S. 367 (1968).
|
[13]
|
Symbolic Expression and the Original Meaning of the First Amendment. The Georgetown Law Journal, 97, 1057-1084.
|
[14]
|
Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598 (1985).
|
[15]
|
Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507 (1948).
|
[16]
|
Wu, T. (2013). Machine Speech. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1495-1533.
|
[17]
|
Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50 (1976).
|