Social Clause in Trade Agreements and China’s Experience
Haoqian Chen*
Law School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2015.61001   PDF    HTML   XML   4,237 Downloads   5,618 Views   Citations

Abstract

The debate that whether inserting “social clause” into trade agreements is justified has been heated recently. This article illustrates how the arguments historically put forward to justify the use of the “social clause”, and how effective this mechanism can be for ensuring that work-related social issues are appropriately taken into account in the operation of international trade arrangements in the context of increasingly integrated economy.

Share and Cite:

Chen, H. (2015) Social Clause in Trade Agreements and China’s Experience. Beijing Law Review, 6, 1-8. doi: 10.4236/blr.2015.61001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Alston, P. (2004). “Core Labour Standards” and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime. European Journal of International Law, 15, 457-521.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.3.457
[2] Andreoni, D. (1986). The Cost of Occupational Accidents and Diseases. Geneva: ILO.
[3] Blanchard, F. (1980). International Trade and Employment: The Role of ILO. Seminar on the North-South Diagoue, Autumn.
[4] Bolle, M. J. (2001). US-Jordan Free Trade Agreement. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service.
[5] Clapham, A., & Martignioni, J. B. (2006). Are We There Yet? In Search of a Coherent EU Strategy on Labour Rights and External Trade. In V. Leary, & D. Warner (Eds.), Globalization and International Institutions, Labour Rights and the EU, ILO, OECD and WTO (pp. 233-311). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
[6] Dorman, P. (1995). Policies to Promote International Labour Rights: An Analytical Review (pp. 6-7). Lansing: Michigan State University.
[7] Elagab, O. Y. (1988). The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law, Oxford.
[8] Fierro, E. (2003). Legal Basis and Scope of the Human Rights Clauses in EC Bilateral Agreements: Any Room for Positive Interpretation. European Law Journal, 7, 41-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00118
[9] Hepple, B. A. (2005). Labour Laws and Global Trade. Oxford: Hart.
[10] Hurtado, I., & Argerey, P. (2008). Social Dumping: The Debate on a Multilateral Social Clause. Global Economy Journal, 8, 1-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1524-5861.1354
[11] Jackson, J. H. (1997). The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (pp. 319-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[12] Janow, M. E., Donaldson, V., & Yanovich, A. (2008). The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement & Developing Countries. Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing, Inc.
[13] Kapstein, E. B. (1996). Workers and the World Economy. Foreign Affairs, 75, 23-25.
[14] Kenner, J. (2011). Labor Clauses in EU Preferential Trade Agreements—An Analysis of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement. In K. W. Bagwell, & P. C. Mavroidis (Eds.), Preferential Trade Agreements: A Law and Economics Analysis (pp. 180-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976445.011
[15] Madhur, S. (2013). China-Japan-Korea FTA: A Dual Track Approach to a Trilateral Agreement. Journal of Economic Integration, 28, 375-392.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11130/jei.2013.28.3.375
[16] Palley, T. I. (2004). The Economic Case for International Labour Standards. Cambridge Journal of Economy Society, 28, 21-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/28.1.21
[17] Servais, J. (1989). The Social Clause in Trade Agreements: Wishful Thinking or an Instrument of Social Progress. International Labour Review, 128, 423.
[18] Servais, J. (2009). International Labour Law (2nd ed., p. 34). Alphen Aan Den Rijin: Kluwer Law International.
[19] Siroen, J. (2013). Labour Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements: Current Practice and Outlook. International Labour Review, 152, 85-106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2013.00170.x
[20] Wang, G. G. (2011). China’s FTAs: Legal Characteristics and Implications. American Journal of International Law, 3, 493.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.