A Note: De-Growth Debate and New Scientific Analysis of Economic Growth


This article is a theoretical note on de-growth debate. The article includes an analysis of economic growth and alternative growth paths. The article is focused on the concepts of de-linking, re-linking and de-growth. We connected linking analysis (de-linking and re-linking) analytically to the de-growth debate. On the basis of our framework, special cases of de-growth in the linking process relate to strong re-linking, weak re-linking and recessive de-linking. This kind of theoretical approach helps us to define the special nature of de-growth. Key finding of us is that only the de-growth case of recessive de-linking meets the condition of environmental sustainability. However, this case does not fulfil the criteria of sustainable development defined in the WCSD context. In the linking process, the WCSD conditions of sustainable development are met in the strong de-linking process only. In our analytical framework, the theoretical concepts of de-growth and sustainable development seem to conflict by definition.

Share and Cite:

Kaivo-oja, J. , Vehmas, J. and Luukkanen, J. (2014) A Note: De-Growth Debate and New Scientific Analysis of Economic Growth. Journal of Environmental Protection, 5, 1477-1481. doi: 10.4236/jep.2014.515140.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Kallis, G. (2011) In Defence of Degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70, 873-880.
[2] Wallerstein, I. (2010) Structural Crises. New Left Review, 62, 133-142.
[3] Martinez-Alier, J. (2009) Socially Sustainable Economic De-Growth. Development and Change, 40, 1099-1119.
[4] Kaivo-oja, J. (1999) Alternative Scenarios of Social Development: Is Analytical Sustainability Policy Analysis Possible? How? Sustainable Development, 7, 140-150.
[5] Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., vander Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. and Foley, J.A. (2009) A Safe operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475.
[6] Smith, R. (2010) Beyond Growth or Beyond Capitalism? Real World Economics Review, 53, 28-36.
[7] Kallis, G., Kerschner, C. and Martinez-Alier, J. (2012) The Economics of Degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 172-180.
[8] Victor, P.A. (2008) Managing without Growth: Slower By Design, Not Disaster. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA.
[9] Vehmas, J., Luukkanen, J. and Kaivo-oja, J. (2007) Linking Analyses and Environmental Kuznets Curves for Aggregated Material Flows in the EU. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1662-1673.
[10] van den Bergh, J. (2011) Environment versus Growth. A Criticism of “Degrowth” and a Plea for A-Growth. Ecological Economics, 70, 881-890.
[11] de Bruyn, S.M. and Opschoor, J.B. (1997) Developments in the Throughput-Income Relationship: Theoretical and Empirical Observations. Ecological Economics, 20, 255-268.
[12] de Bruyn, S.M. (2000) Economic Growth and the Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect.
[13] Magnani, E. (2001) The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Development Path or Policy Result? Environmental Modelling & Software, 16, 157-165.
[14] Panayotou, T. (1993) Empirical Test and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. World Employment Research Programme, Working Paper, International Labour Office, Geneva.
[15] Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. (1995) Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353-377.
[16] Ekins, P. (1997) The Kuznets Curve for the Environment and Economic Growth: Examining the Evidence. Environment and Planning A, 29, 805-830.
[17] Rothman, D.S. and de Bruyn, S. (1998) Probing into the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 25, 143-145.
[18] Borghesi, S. (1999) The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Survey of Literature. European University Institute, Florence.
[19] Seppala, T., Haukioja, T. and Kaivo-oja, J. (2001) The EKC Hypothesis Does Not Hold for Direct Material Flows: Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Tests for Direct Material Flows in 5 Industrial Countries. Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 23, 217-238.
[20] D’Alisa, G. and Cattaneo, C. (2013) Household Work and Energy Consumption: A Degrowth Perspective. Catalonia’s Case Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 71-79.
[21] Victor, P.A. (2012) Growth, Degrowth and Climate Change: A Scenario Analysis. Ecological Economics, 84, 206-212.
[22] Sekulova, F., Kallis, G., Rodriguez-Labajos, B. and Schneider, F. (2013) Degrowth: From Theory to Practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 1-6.
[23] Lorek, S. and Fuchs, D. (2013) Strong Sustainable Consumption Governance—Precondition for a Degrowth Path? Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 36-43.
[24] Latouche, S. (2009) Farewell to Growth. Polity Press, Cambridge.
[25] Nørgard, J.S. (2013) Happy Degrowth through More Amateur Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 61-70.
[26] Bruntland, G. (1987) Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University, Oxford.
[27] Brundtland, G.H. (1987) What Is Sustainable Development? Fourteen Case Studies Prepared by African and Asian Journalists. In Omoro, B., et al., Eds., Towards Sustainable Development, Panos Publications Ltd., Panos Books, London, vii-ix.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.