An Empirical Research on Evaluation of Low-Carbon Economy in Guangdong Province, China: Based on “Production, Life and Environment”

Chunrong Liu^1*, Yaoqiu Kuang², Ningsheng Huang², Xiuming Liu³

¹Jiaying University, Meizhou, China.
²Sustainable Development Research Center, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
³School of Humanities and Social Science, Guangzhou Civil Aviation College, Guangzhou, China.

DOI: 10.4236/lce.2014.54015                

Abstract

In order to promote the development of Low-carbon economy (LCE), it is important to establish a scientific LCE quantitative evaluation system. Based on the concept of “life, production and environment”, this paper builds the decomposition models of carbon emission influencing factors from these three aspects and inductively analyzes the factors influencing LCE development. According to these factors, this paper correspondingly builds a quantitative evaluation index system of LCE, which makes up the deficiency in selection index in theory. The evaluation of LCE in Guangdong Province is carried out by applying the analytic hierarchy process, entropy method and composite index method. Results showed that the development of LCE in Guangdong was on the decline during the period of 2000-2012 and the rapid economic growth in Guangdong was achieved at the expense of the environment. Therefore, this paper puts forward some suggestions that Guangdong should improve the utilization of clean energy, pay attention to the optimization of energy mix from household and productive sector, and attach equal importance to the structure optimization when enlarging its foreign trade scale. In addition, with limited land resources, Guangdong should take into account the common development of production, life and environment in land planning.

Keywords

Carbon Emission, Low-Carbon Economy, Quantitative Evaluation

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Qin, X.Z. (2010) Evaluation of Enterprise Technology Innovation Project Based on Low-Carbon Economy. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII 2010), Kunming.
[2]	Hong, J. and Chen, F.J. (2011) Low Carbon Development Assessment of Fujian Province, China Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Forest Carbon Sinks Information. MSIE, 278-281.
[3]	Hu, Z.G., Yuan, J.H. and Hu, Z. (2011) Study on China’s Low Carbon Development in an Economy-Energy-Electricity-Environment Framework. Energy Policy, 39, 2596-2605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.028
[4]	Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2009) China Sustainable Development Report 2009. Science Press, Beijing.
[5]	Parikh, J. and Parikh, K. (2011) India’s Energy Needs and Low Carbon Options. Energy, 36, 3650-3658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.046
[6]	Li, J.L. (2011) Measurable Indicators of Low-Carbon Economy for Air Transportation—A Case Study of Shenzhen. Energy Procedia, 5, 1697-1705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.289
[7]	He, C. and Feng, X. (2012) Evaluation Indicators for Energy-Chemical Systems with Multi-Feed and Multi-Product. Energy, 43, 344-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.019
[8]	Feng, Z.-M. (2012) The Establishment of Regional Low-Carbon Economic Development Ability Evaluation Index System. Statistics and Decision, 11, 63-65.
[9]	Viebahn, P., Daniel, V. and Samuel, H. (2013) Integrated Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in the German Power Sector and Comparison with the Deployment of Renewable Energies. Applied Energy, 97, 238-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.053
[10]	Subramanian, K.A., Mathad, V.C., Vijay, V.K. and Subbarao, P.M.V. (2013) Comparative Evaluation of Emission and Fuel Economy of an Automotive Spark Ignition Vehicle Fuelled with Methane Enriched Biogas and CNG Using Chassis Dynamometer. Applied Energy, 105, 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.011
[11]	Yue, T., Long, R.Y., Chen, H. and Zhao, X. (2013) The Optimal CO2 Emissions Reduction Path in Jiangsu Province: An Expanded IPAT Approach. Applied Energy, 112, 1510-1517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.046
[12]	Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., et al., Eds. (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IGES, Kanagawa.
[13]	IPCC (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Volume II. The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan.
[14]	Xiao, H.-J., Kuang, Y.-Q. and Huang, N.-S., et al. (2006) Study on Carbon Budget Change of Guangzhou City under High-Speed Industrial Development. Ecology and Environment, 15, 1209-1215.
[15]	Kuang, Y.-Q., Huang, N.-S., Zhu, Z.-Y., et al. (2009) Sustainable Development Process in Guangdong China. Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou.
[16]	Ye, W.-H. (2009) Establish a Healthy Society with the Common Development of Life, Production and Environment. http://news.xinhuanet.com/video/2011-09/22/c_122075070.htm
[17]	Yoichi, K. (1989) Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. Presentation to the Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, IPCC, Paris.
[18]	Wang, Z.H., Yin, F.C., Zhang, Y.X. and Zhang, X. (2012) An Empirical Research on the Influencing Factors of Regional CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Beijing City, China. Applied Energy, 100, 277-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.038
[19]	Duarte, R., Mainar, A. and Sánchez-Chóliz, J. (2013) The Role of Consumption Patterns, Demand and Technological Factors on the Recent Evolution of CO2 Emissions in a Group of Advanced Economies. Ecological Economics, 96, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.007
[20]	Andersson, F.N.G. and Karpestam, P. (2013) CO2 Emissions and Economic Activity: Short- and Long-Run Economic Determinants of Scale, Energy Intensity and Carbon Intensity. Energy Policy, 61, 1285-1294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.004