Data Envelopment Analysis of Corporate Failure for Non-Manufacturing Firms Using a Slacks-Based Measure

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2014.74025   PDF   HTML     4,431 Downloads   5,471 Views   Citations


The problem of predicting corporate failure has intrigued many in the investment sector, corporate decision makers, business partners and many others, hence the intense research efforts by industry and academia. The majority of former research efforts on this topic focused on manufacturing companies with considerable assets commensurate with their size. But there is a dearth of publications on predicting non-manufacturing firms’ financial difficulties since these firms typically do not have significant assets that rely heavily on assets, and a key variable cannot be adequate. Recently, data envelopment analysis (DEA) rather than Altman’s Z score model and traditional parametric methods has become a research interest in predicting corporate failure. However, there is still no research showing how to fix appropriate cut-off points to distinguish the performance of firms. Our research utilizes slack-based measure (SBM) DEA model to generate efficiency scores for non-manufacturing firms; then we categorize these firms into safe, grey and distress zones by proposing cut-off points based on 5 years DEA analysis. The result shows that the proposed method has obvious advantages in predicting corporate financial stress.

Share and Cite:

Paradi, J. , Wilson, D. and Yang, X. (2014) Data Envelopment Analysis of Corporate Failure for Non-Manufacturing Firms Using a Slacks-Based Measure. Journal of Service Science and Management, 7, 277-290. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2014.74025.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Beaver, W.H. (1967) Financial Ratios as Predictor of Failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 71-111.
[2] Altman, E. (1968) Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 589-609.
[3] Grice, J. and Ingram, R. (2001) Tests of the Generalizability of Altman’s Bankruptcy Prediction Model. Journal of Business Research, 54, 53-61.
[4] Stephen, H., Keating, E., et al. (2004) Assessing the Probability of Bankruptcy. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 5-34.
[5] The World Bank (2011) Growth of the Service Sector.
[6] Altman, E. (2002) Bankruptcy, Credit Risk and High Yield Junk Bonds. Blackwell Publishers Inc., Malden.
[7] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
[8] Farrell, M.J. (1957) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 120, 253-290.
[9] Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B.R. and Tavares, G. (2008) Evaluation of Research in Efficiency and Productivity: A Survey and Analysis of the First 30 Years of Scholarly Literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151-157.
[10] Paradi, J.C. and Zhu, H. (2013) A Survey on Bank Branch Efficiency and Performance Research with Data Envelopment Analysis. Omega, 41, 61-79.
[11] Liu, J.S., Lu, L.Y., Lu, W.M. and Lin, B.J. (2013) Data Envelopment Analysis 1978-2010: A Citation-Based Literature Survey. Omega, 41, 3-15.
[12] Yang, X. and Morita, H. (2013) Efficiency Improvement from Multiple Perspectives: An Application to Japanese Banking Industry. Omega, 41, 501-509.
[13] Alexander, S.S. (1949) The Effect of Size of Manufacturing Corporation on the Distribution of the Rate of Return. Review of Economics and Statistics, 31, 229-235.
[14] Deakin, E. (1972) A Discriminant Analysis of Predictors of Business Failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 167-179.
[15] Ohlson, J.A. (1980) Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 109-131.
[16] Zmijewski, M.E. (1984) Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59-82.
[17] Hsieh, S.J. (1993) A Note on the Optimal Cutoff Point in Bankruptcy Prediction Models. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30, 457-464.
[18] Grice, J.S. and Dugan, M. (2001) The Limitations of Bankruptcy Prediction Models: Some Cautions for the Researcher. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 17, 151-166.
[19] Shumway, T. (2001) Forecasting Bankruptcy More Accurately: A Simple Hazard Model. Journal of Business, 74, 101-124.
[20] Grice, J.S. and Ingram, R.W. (2001) Tests of the Generalizability of Altman’s Bankruptcy Prediction Model. Journal of Business Research, 54, 53-61.
[21] Chava, S. and Jarrow, R. (2004) Bankruptcy Prediction with Industry Effects. Review of Finance, 8, 537-569.
[22] Premachandra, I., Chen, Y. and Watson, J. (2011) DEA as a Tool for Predicting Corporate Failure and Success: A Case of Bankruptcy Assessment. Omega, 39, 620-626.
[23] Li, Z., Crook, J. and Andreeva, G. (2014) Chinese Companies Distress Prediction: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65, 466-479.
[24] Shetty, U., Pakkala, T. and Mallikarjunappa, T. (2012) A Modified Directional Distance Formulation of DEA to Assess Bankruptcy: An Application to IT/ITES Companies in India. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 1988-1997.
[25] Xu, X. and Wang, Y. (2009) Financial Failure Prediction Using Efficiency as a Predictor. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 366-373.
[26] Cielen, A., Peeters, L. and Vanhoof, K. (2004) Bankruptcy Prediction Using a Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 526-532.
[27] Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M. (2009) Methodological Comparison between DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) and DEA-DA (Discriminant Analysis) from the Perspective of Bankruptcy Assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 561-575.
[28] Yeh, C.C., Chi, D.J. and Hsu, M.F. (2010) A Hybrid Approach of DEA, Rough Set and Support Vector Machines for Business Failure Prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1535-1541.
[29] Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. (1984) Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
[30] Tone, K. (2001) A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498-509.
[31] Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Tone, K. (2007) Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin, 333-335.
[32] Staat, M. (2001) The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA: Comment. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15, 129-137.
[33] Zhang, Y. and Bartels, R. (1998) The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9, 187-204.
[34] Smith, P. (1997) Model Misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 233-252.
[35] Banker, R.D., Chang, H. and Cooper, W.W. (1996) Simulation Studies of Efficiency, Returns to Scale and Misspecification with Nonlinear Functions in DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 66, 233-253.
[36] Panagiotis, Z. (2012) Dealing with Small Samples and Dimensionality Issues in Data Envelopment Analysis.
[37] Sergio, P. and Daniel, S. (2009) How to Generate Regularly Behaved Production Data? A Monte Carlo Experimentation on DEA Scale Efficiency Measurement. European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 303-310.
[38] Mergent, I. (2011) Mergent Online.
[39] Charles, L.M. (1942) Financing Small Corporations in Five Manufacturing Industries, 1926-36. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.