Internet as a Growing and Dynamic Network: An Economic View


The past few decades have witnessed renewed interest and research efforts on the part of the scientific community. After spending decades to disassemble nature, focusing the attention on its components, scientists have shifted their attention on complex networks. These basic structures constitute a wide range of systems in nature and society, but their design is irregular, evolves dynamically over time and their components can fit in a large multiplicity of alternative ways. Nevertheless, the most recent studies of networks have made remarkable progresses by investigating some critical issues of structure and dynamics, thereby improving the understanding of the topology and the growth processes of complex networks. From an economic point of view, networks are especially interesting because they can be considered as a problem of allocation of a critical resource, information, under multiple constraints. They can also be viewed as forms of poliarchies that reproduce, for many aspects, the market paradigm, with surprising properties of self-organization and resilience, which go much beyond the characteristics that are generally attributed to general equilibrium structures. In this paper we first address the major results achieved in the study of complex network and then focus our attention on two specific, highly dynamic and complex networks: Internet and the World Wide Web.

Share and Cite:

Scandizzo, P. and Imperiali, A. (2014) Internet as a Growing and Dynamic Network: An Economic View. Communications and Network, 6, 69-75. doi: 10.4236/cn.2014.62009.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Strogatz, S.H. (2001) Exploring Complex Networks. Nature, 410, 268-276.
[2] Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M. and Hwang, D.-U. (2006) Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics. Physics Reports, 424, 175-308.
[3] Barabasi, A.L. (2002) Linked: the New Science of Networks. Perseus Books Group, New York City.
[4] Lin, N. (1999) Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22, 28-51.
[5] Coase, R. (1988) The Firm, the Market, and the Law. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[6] Ackerman, B.A. and Alstott, A. (1999) The Stakeholder Society. Yale University Press, New Haven.
[7] Erdos, P. and Renyi, A. (1959) On Random Graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6, 290.
[8] Milgram, S. (1967) The Small World Problem. Psychology Today, 160.
[9] Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. Sociol., 78, 1360.
[10] Watts, D.J. and Strogatz, S.H. (1998) Collective Dynamics of Small-World Networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
[11] Goyal, S., Van der Leij, M. and Moraga-Gonzàlez, J.L. (2005) Economics: An Emerging Small-World. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 403-412.
[12] Foucault, M. (1980) War in the Filigree of Peace Course Summary. Oxford Literary Review, 4, 15-19.
[13] Stout, L. (2004) On the Nature of Corporations. Deakin Law Review, 9, 775-789.
[14] Berners Lee, T.J. and Fiaschetti, M. (1999) Weaving the WEB, Harper, San Francisco.
[15] Albert, R. and Barabasi, A.L. (2002) Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science and Everyday Life. Plumes, New York City.
[16] Albert, R. and Barabasi, A.L. (2002) Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Review of Modern Physics, 74, 47-97.
[17] Barabasi, A.L. and Albert, R. (1999) Emergence of Scale in Random Networks. Science, 286, 509.
[18] Barabasi, A.L., Albert, R. and Jeong, H. (1999) Scale Free Characyeristics of Random Networks: The Topology of the World Wide Web. Physica A, 272, 173.
[19] Albert, R. and Barabasi, A.L. (2000) Topology of Evolving Networks: Local Events and Universalities. Physical Review Letters, 85, 5234.

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.