Expected Difference, Equity Nature and the Corporate Control Agreement Transfer Failed—the Evidence from China
Xiaodong Li
DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2011.41004   PDF    HTML     4,577 Downloads   8,058 Views   Citations


This paper has researched the issue of corporate control transfer failed in china capital market, which is completely different from existing studies in corporate control transfer field. The conclusion has shown that corporate control transfer very likely fails when there is a great difference between two sides of deals. And the equity nature is another affection factor. The corporate control transfer is not likely to fail when the equity nature is state-owned. The conclusion implies that we should make more improvement for institutions of corporate control transfer, because of the lack of market voluntary trade rule in china capital market.

Share and Cite:

X. Li, "Expected Difference, Equity Nature and the Corporate Control Agreement Transfer Failed—the Evidence from China," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2011, pp. 22-26. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2011.41004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] O. Hart, “Firms, Contracts and Financial structure,” [M], GeZhi Press, 1998, pp. 233-256.
[2] S. M. Li and Y. C. Zhang, “Institutional Environment, Transaction Rule and Efficiency of Corporate Control Transfer,” Journal of Economics Research, Vol. 5, 2009, pp. 92-105.
[3] Hart et al., “Contract Economics,” [M], Economics Science Press, 1999, pp. 319.
[4] J. X. You and J. S. Zhang and W. Jiang, “Institution Building, Firm-Specific Information and the Synchronicity of Stock Prices: A R2 Based Perspective,” China Economic Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 1, October, 2006, pp. 189- 206.
[5] Roll and Richard, “R2,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, No. 3, 1988, pp.541-566.
[6] Durnev, Artyom, Randall Morck, B. Yeung and P. Zarowin, “Does Greater Firm-Specific Return Variation Mean More or Less Informed Stock Pricing ,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2003 , pp. 797-836. doi:10.1046/j.1475-679X.2003.00124.x
[7] Z. Z. Yuan and X. F. Ju, “The Validity Test of Stock Price Non-Synchronicity Method Used to Measure Stock Price Informativeness Based on Panel Data Model,” Journal of China Soft Science, Vol. 3, 2009, pp.174-185
[8] M. Ferreira and P. Laux, “Corporate Governance, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Information Flow,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2007, pp. 951-989. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01228.x
[9] X. Z Wu, “The Summary of M&A Conference,” Accounting Research, Vol. 2, 2010, pp. 89-91.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.