Knowledge and Perceptions of Energy Alternatives, Carbon and Spatial Footprints, and Future Energy Preferences within a University Community in Northeastern US

Joanna Burger, Michael Gochfeld

Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Rutgers Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA.
Division of Life Sciences, Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/epe.2013.54033                

Abstract

Our overall research aim was to examine whether people distinguished between the spatial footprint and carbon footprint of different energy sources, and whether their overall “worry” about energy types was related to future developed of these types. We surveyed 451 people within a university community regarding knowledge about different energy sources with regard to renewability and spatial and carbon footprints and attitudes about which energy type(s) should be developed further. Findings were: 1) Gas, oil and coal were rated as the least renewable, and wind, solar and hydro as the most renewable; 2) Oil and coal were rated as having the largest carbon footprint, while wind, solar and tidal were rated the lowest; 3) There were smaller differences in ratings for spatial footprints, probably reflecting unfamiliarity with the concept, although oil and gas were rated the highest; 4) Energy sources viewed as renewable were favored for future development compared with non-renewable energy sources, and coal and oil were rated the lowest; 5) Worry-free sources such as solar were favored; and 6) There were some age-related differences, but they were small, and there were no gender-related differences. Overall, subjects knew more about carbon footprints than spatial footprints, generally correctly identified renewable and non-renewable sources, and wanted future energy development for energy sources which were less worried about (e.g. solar, wind). These perceptions require in-depth examination in a large sample from different areas of the country.

Keywords

Energy Sources; Preferences; Survey; Ecological Footprint; Carbon Footprint; Spatial Footprint

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	M. Greenberg and K. Crossney, “The Changing Face of Public Concern about Pollution in the United States: A Case Study of New Jersey,” Environment, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2006, pp. 255-268.
[2]	M. R. Greenberg, “Energy Sources, Public Policy, and Public Preferences: Analysis of US National and Site Specific Data,” Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2009, pp. 3242-3249. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.020
[3]	M. R. Raupach, G. Marland, P. Ciais, C. LeQuere, J. G. Canadell, G. Klepper and C. B. Field, “Global and Re gional Drivers of Accelerating Cos Emissions,” Proc eedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, No. 24, 2007, pp. 10288-10293. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700609104
[4]	B. J. M deVries, D. P vanVuuren and M. M. Hoogwijk, “Renewable Energy Sources: Their Global Potential for the First Half of the 21st Century at the Global Level: An Integrated Approach,” Energy Policy, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2007, pp. 2590-2610. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002
[5]	EIA (Energy Information Administration), Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, US Energy Information Ad ministration, 2010. http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/ieo/emissions.html
[6]	N. Chambers, C. Simmons and M. Wackernagel, “Shar ing Nature’s Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indi cator of Sustainability,” Earthscan, London, 2000.
[7]	E. Holden and K. G. H?yer, “The Ecological Footprints of Fuels,” Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2005, pp. 395-403.
[8]	IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 2007, Contribution of Working Group to the Fourth Assesment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climage Change, Cambridge University Press, Cam bridge, 2007.
[9]	G. Stoglehner, “Ecological Footpring—A Tool for As sessing Sustainable Energy Supplies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2003, pp. 267-277. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00046-X
[10]	S. M. Benson and F. M. Orr Jr., “Sustainability and Energy Conversion” MRS Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2008, pp. 297-302. doi:10.1557/mrs2008.257
[11]	C. J. Bromley, M. Mongillo, G. Hiriart, B. Goldstein, R. Bertani, E. Huenges, A. Ragnarsson, J. Tester, H. Muraoka and V. Zui, V, “Contribution of Geothermal Energy to Climate Change Mitigation: The IPCC Renewable Energy Report,” Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Bali, 25-29 April 2010, pp. 1-5.
[12]	P. Upham, L. Whitmarsh, W. Poortinga, K. Purdam, A. Darnton, C. McLachlan and P. Devine-Wright, “Public Attitudes to Environmental Change: A Selective Review of Theory and Practice,” Research Councils, Swindon, 2009. www.lwec.org.uk
[13]	J. Zoellner, P. Schweizer-Ries and C. Wemheurer, “Public Acceptance of Renewable Energies: Results from Case Studies in Germany,” Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2008, pp. 4136-4141. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.026
[14]	A. Spence, W. Poortinga, C. Butler and N. F. Pidgeon, “Perceptions of Climate Change and Willingness to Save Energy Related to Flood Experience,” Nature, Vol. 1, 2011, pp. 46-49.
[15]	G. Ellis, J. Barry and C. Robinson, “Many Ways to Say ‘No’-Different Ways to Say ‘Yes’; Applying Q-Methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farm Proposals,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2007, pp. 517-551. doi:10.1080/09640560701402075
[16]	M. R. Greenberg, “How Much Do People Who Live near Major Nuclear Facilities Worry about Those Facilities: Analysis of National and Site-Specific Data,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 52, No. 7, 2009, pp. 919-937. doi:10.1080/09640560903181063
[17]	H. C. Hung and T. W. Wang, “Determinants and Map ping of Collective Perceptions of Technological Risk: The Case of the Second Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2011, pp. 668-682. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01539.x
[18]	R. R. Kasperson, O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson and S. Ratick, “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1988, pp. 177-187. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
[19]	M. Wolsink, “Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY Theory on the Facility Sitting,” Urban Studies, Vol. 31, No. 6, 1994, pp. 851-866. doi:10.1080/00420989420080711
[20]	G. O. Rogers, “Siting Potentially Hazardous Facilities: What Factors Impact Perceived and Acceptable Risk?” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1998, pp. 265-281. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00087-X
[21]	P. Slovic, “The Perceptions of Risk,” In: J. Slovic, Ed., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, London, 2000, pp. 221-230.
[22]	D. L. Feldman and R. A. Hanahan, “Public Perceptions of a Radioactively Contaminated Site: Concerns, Remediation Preferences, and Desired Involvement,” Environ mental Health Perspectives, Vol. 104, No. 12, 1996, pp. 1344-1352. doi:10.1289/ehp.961041344
[23]	M. R. Greenberg, “NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear-Related Facilities: US National and 11 Site Specific Surveys,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2009b, pp. 1242-1245. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01262.x
[24]	H. C. Jenkins-Smith, C. L. Silva, M. C. Nowlin and G. deLozier, “Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Pub lic Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2011, pp. 629-644. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x
[25]	D. Bell, T. Gray and C. Haggett, “The ‘Social’ Gap in Wind Farm Sitting Decisions; Explanations and Policy Responses,” Environmental Policy, 2005, pp. 49-64.
[26]	G. J. Dalton, D. A. Lockington and T. E. Baldock, “A Survey of Tourist Attitudes to Renewable Energy Supply in Australian Hotel Accommodation,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 33, No. 10, 2008, pp. 2174-2185. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.12.016
[27]	United States Energy Information Administration (USEIA), US Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy Sources, EIA of DOE, 2010.
[28]	T. Soderqvist, H. Eggert, B. Olsson and A. Soutukorva, “Economic Valuation for Sustainable Development in the Swedish Coastal Zone,” Ambio, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2005, pp. 169-175.
[29]	M. Siegrist, G. Cvetkovih and C. Roth, “Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2000, pp. 353-362. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034
[30]	T. C Beierle, “The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2002, pp. 739-749. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00065
[31]	T. Dietz and P. C. Stern, “Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision-Making,” National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2008.
[32]	P. Devine-Wright, “Local Aspects of UK Renewable Energy Development; Exploring Public Beliefs and Policy Implications,” Local Environment, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2005, pp. 57-69. doi:10.1080/1354983042000309315
[33]	J. Blake, “Overcoming the ‘Value-Action Gap’ in Environmental Policy: Tensions between National Policy and Local Experience,” Local Environ, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1999, pp. 257-278. doi:10.1080/13549839908725599
[34]	R. Kahn, “Siting Struggles; the Unique Challenge of Permitting Renewable Energy Power Plants,” The Electric Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2000, pp. 21-33. doi:10.1016/S1040-6190(00)00085-3
[35]	J. Kitzes, A. Peller, S. Goldfinger and M. Wachernagel, “Current Methods for Calculating National Ecological Footprint Accounts,” Scientific Environmental Sustain ability Society, Vol. 4, 2007, pp. 1-9.
[36]	A. Leiserowitz, E. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, N. Smith and J. D. Hmielowski, “Climate Change in the American Mind: Public Support for Climate & Energy Policies in November 2011,” Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, 2011.
[37]	Council on Foreign Relations, US Opinion on Energy Security, 2012.
[38]	J. L. Renner, “Geothermal Energy,” In: T. M. Letcher, Ed., Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for Our Planet, Elsevier, New York, 2008, pp. 211-224.
[39]	P. W. Gerbens-Leenes, A. Y. Hoekstra and T. H. van der Meer, “The Water Footprint from Biomass: A Quantitative Assessment and Consequences of an Increasing Share of Bio-Energy in Energy Supply,” Ecological Economy, Vol. 68, No. 4, 2009, pp.1032-1060. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.013
[40]	P. Champagne, “Biomass,” In: T. M. Letcher, Ed., Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for Our Planet, Elsevier, New York, 2008, pp. 151-170.
[41]	M. A. J. Huijbregt, S. Hellweg, R. Frischknecht, K. Hun gerbuhler and A. J. Hendriks, “Ecological Footprint Accounting in the Life Cycle Assessment of Products,” Ecology Economics, Vol. 64, No. 4, 2008, pp. 798-807. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.017
[42]	B. Sovacool, “Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power: A Critical Survey,” Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 8, 2008, pp. 2940-2953. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.017
[43]	D. M. Berman and J. T. O’Connor, “Who Owns the Sun? People, Politics and the Struggle for a Solar Economy,” Chelsea Green Publishing Co., White River Junction, VT, 1996.
[44]	W. Shi, “Renewable Energy: Finding Solutions for a Greener Tomorrow,” Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2010, pp. 33-37. doi:10.1007/s11157-010-9187-6
[45]	F. E. Trainer, “Can Renewable Energy Sources Sustain Affluent Society?” Energy Policy, Vol. 23, No. 12, 1995, pp. 1009-1026. doi:10.1016/0301-4215(95)00085-2
[46]	E. E. Thorhallsdottir, “Environment and Energy in Ice land: A Comparative Analysis of Values and Impacts,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2007, pp. 522-544. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.004
[47]	H. Lund, “Renewable Energy Strategies for Sustainable Development,” Energy, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2007, pp. 912-919. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.017
[48]	H. Lund and B. V. Mathiesen, “Energy System Analysis of 100% Renewable Energy Systems—the Case of Den mark in Years 2030 and 2050,” Energy, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2009, pp. 524-531. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.04.003
[49]	V. Smil, “Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects,” Praeger, California, 2010.
[50]	L. Rybach and M. Mongillo, “Geothermal Sustainability—A Review with Identified Research Needs,” GRC Transaction, Vol. 30, 2006, pp. 1083-1090.
[51]	B. A. Goldstein, G. Hiriart, J. Tester, B. Bertani, R. Bromley, L. Guierrez-Negrin, C. J. Huenges, H. Ragnarsson, A. Mongillo, M. A. Muraoka and V. I. Zui, “Great Expectations for Geothermal Energy to 2100,” Proceedings 36th Workshop of Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, 31 January-2 February 2011.
[52]	D. Dicaire and F. H. Tezel, “Regeneration and Efficiency Characterization of Hybrid Adsorbent for Thermal Energy Storage of Excess and Solar Heat,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2011, pp. 986-992. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.031
[53]	M. Greenberg and H. B. Truelove, “Energy Choices and Risk Beliefs: It Is Just Global Warming and Fear of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident?” Risk Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2011, pp. 819-831. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01535.x
[54]	D. W. Keith, J. F. DeCarolis, D. C. Denkenberger, D. H. Lenschow, S. L. Malyshev, S. Pacala and P. J. Rasch, “The Influence of Large-Scale Wind Power on Global Climate,” Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Science of the United States of America, Vol. 101, No. 46, 2004, pp. 16115-16120. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406930101