Molecular Screening of Rice Cultivated in Benin for the Identification of Xanthomonas oryzae Pv. oryzae and Bacterial Leaf Blight Resistance Genes
Chimène Nadège Mahoussi Nanoukon1*, Koffi David Montcho Hambada2, Antoine Abel Missihoun3, Kéllya Laurinzo Déguénon1, Bignon Meyrix Pamela Franzel Loumédjinon1, Bana Wêtè Déré Félicité Bio1, Emilienne Zinsou1, Réel Gael Fael Houngbélagnon1, Amed Sèmèvo Havivi1, Lamine Baba-Moussa4, Lambert Gustave Djédatin1
1Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Applied to Genomics, National School of Applied Biosciences and Biotechnolo-gies, National University of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Dassa-Zoumè, Benin.
1Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Applied to Genomics, National School of Applied Biosciences and Biotechnologies, National University of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Dassa-Zoumè, Benin.
2Laboratory of Plant, Horticultural and Forestry Sciences, National University of Agriculture, Kétou, Benin.
3Laboratory of Molécular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology (FAST), University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
4Laboratory of Biology and Molecular Typing in Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
DOI: 10.4236/abb.2023.1412036   PDF    HTML   XML   56 Downloads   216 Views  

Abstract

One of the most devastating diseases of rice worldwide is bacterial blight (BLB) caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae (Xoo). In Benin, Xoo was first described in 2013 on wild rice Oryzae longistaminata. So far, no study has been done on Beninese Xoo strains. We do not know whether the pathogen has already passed into the rice varieties grown, or if they are exposed to other bacteria. Whereas the use of resistant varieties, carrying resistance genes, is the only highly effective and environmentally friendly way to control this disease, no information is available on these Xoo resistance genes in rice varieties grown in Benin apart from the one we recently. This study aims to identify Beninese Xoo strains, causing BLB and screen rice varieties grown in Benin for the main resistance genes. Diseased rice leaves showing typical symptoms of fire blight collected from different rice fields in the three phytogeographic areas of Benin were analyzed by PCR for Xoo-specific sequence identification. Furthermore, seventy-five collected rice accessions were screened to identify xa5, Xa7, xa13, and Xa21 resistance genes to Xoo. The results reveal that Xanthomonas oryzae was identified in two fields in Banikouara and one in Malanville. On the other hand, Sphingomonas sp. has been identified in several other rice fields in Benin. Forty-seven of seventy-five rice accessions examined (62.66%) carried Xoo resistance genes with 3 (4%) and 40 (53.33%) of xa5 and Xa21 respectively. None of the accessions had either Xa7 or xa13 resistance genes. Three accessions possess both xa5 and Xa21 genes. Isogenic lines IRBB60 and IRBB21, supposed to be a positive control, presented a Xoo sensitivity allele. These results indicate that Xoo has moved from the wild rice variety to the cultivated variety in northern Benin and varietal improvement programs must be implemented with varieties having several resistance genes for the efficient response against a possible BLB pandemic in Benin.

Share and Cite:

Nanoukon, C. , Hambada, K. , Missihoun, A. , Déguénon, K. , Loumédjinon, B. , Bio, B. , Zinsou, E. , Houngbélagnon, R. , Havivi, A. , Baba-Moussa, L. and Djédatin, L. (2023) Molecular Screening of Rice Cultivated in Benin for the Identification of Xanthomonas oryzae Pv. oryzae and Bacterial Leaf Blight Resistance Genes. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 14, 514-533. doi: 10.4236/abb.2023.1412036.

1. Introduction

Rice is a well-known crop around the world. It is the second largest cereal grown with 149,000,000 ha and the third in terms of production with 380,000,000 tons, consumed and exported worldwide after wheat and maize. Asian production alone stands at 643 million tons while African production remains very low (24.8 million tons). However, this production is limited by numerous biotic and abiotic constraints. Diseases such as rice blast, rice yellow mottle and bacterial leaf blight are the major biotic factors influencing rice production. Xanthomonas oryzae causes two important diseases of rice: X. oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) causes bacterial leaf blight (BLB), while X. oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xoc) causes bacterial leaf streak (BLS). First observed in Japan in 1884, BLB is characterized by short, yellowish lesions that appear on the leaf margins and develop over the entire leaf surface [1] . These lesions originate from the bacterium’s entry points, i.e. hydathodes, stomata, and wounds. On young plants, these lesions, initially pale-green to gray-green, turn yellowish-white, and coalesce to cover the whole leaf. At the maximum tillering stage, the entire leaf is affected by these large yellowish lesions, which can become necrotic, leading to the loss of the leaf. There is a more severe, systemic form of the disease, known as “kresek” or wilting. It is characterized by the development of grayish lesions followed by complete and sudden wilting of the young seedlings after transplanting [2] . The yield losses caused vary between 20% and 80% [2] [3] . The intensification of cultivation has affected the severity of the disease. Plants are generally affected during tillering, leading to yield losses of 10% to 50% [1] . Modeling studies carried out in South and Southeast Asia indicate that the impact of vascular bacterial disease has become low there, unlike in Africa. In fact, the introduction of selected host-resistant plant lines has considerably reduced yield losses in these regions [3] . In 2003 and 2009, extensive surveys in three West African countries indicated a high incidence of BLB with race A3 reported in Mali, race A1 and A2 in Burkina Faso, and A1 also reported in Niger [2] [3] [4] . In Benin, rice consumption has become high (406,000 tons of paddy rice in 2019) and domestic production has tripled in the last ten years [5] . However, his production is unable to meet demand [6] . In Benin, Xoo was first described in 2013 on wild rice Oryza longistaminata. So far, no study has been done on Beninese Xoo strains to better characterize these strains [7] .

To control BLB, cultural, chemical, and biological control approaches have been developed. It is generally based on seed disinfection and curative treatment of crops with antibiotics. Xoo can be eliminated by soaking seeds for 12 hours in an aqueous solution of Ceresan and Agaricine, followed by soaking in hot water at 53˚C for 30 minutes. These chemical methods, which are sometimes ineffective and have harmful consequences for the environment, are not adopted in all countries [8] [9] . The selection of disease-resistant rice varieties has been found to be the most effective, economical, and least environmentally damaging method for BLB control [10] . Use of resistant varieties eliminates yield losses caused by bacterial leaf scorch in rice fields [10] . Various rice genes conferring resistance to Xoo have been identified genetically and designated in a series from Xa1 to Xa 45, of which nine were identified as recessively inherited. Eleven of them have been characterized as encoding different types of proteins, suggesting multiple mechanisms of R gene-mediated X. oryzae pv. oryzae resistance [11] [12] . Some of them have been introgressed into elite rice varieties in Asia. Dominant genes Xa21, Xa7 and recessive genes xa5, xa13, one of the most widely used genes in Asian rice breeding programs are referred to have broad-spectrum because of their resistance to several races of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.

The Xa21 resistance gene located on chromosome 11 of rice and originating from the ancestral species Oryza longistaminata has attracted the attention of breeders because of its broad-spectrum resistance to various strains of Xoo. This dominant gene provides stable and durable resistance against Xoo in northern Vietnam and India [13] . It is the most effective gene showing resistance to 88% of Xoo strains in India [12] . Unlike other genes that confer resistance only at the adult stage of the plant (e.g., Xa7), resistance mediated by the Xa21 gene increases gradually from the susceptible juvenile stage to full resistance at the later adult stage [14] . The Xa21 gene has shown resistance to six races of Xoo in China and has been used in a breeding program (Huang et al., 1997) to improve resistance to bacterial blight. Similarly, it was introduced into the cultivar PR106 in India because it showed resistance to 17 strains of Xoo [13] . It is considered the most effective gene for 88% of Xoo strains in India [12] .

The recessive xa5 gene was identified in DZ192 [15] and is located on the short arm of chromosome 5 [16] . This gene is a natural mutation of a sensitive allele from which it differs by two nucleotide substitutions to cause the change of a single amino acid at position 39, i.e. glutamine (E) instead of valine (V) (V39E). This mutation confers resistance to a wide range of Xoo strains [17] . Thus, the xa5 gene is one of the most widely used genes in breeding programs in Asia and confers resistance to several strains and races of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.

Most of the resistance genes identified do not confer durable resistance, particularly in the current context of global warming [18] . High temperatures reduce the resistance of certain rice varieties to Xoo, such as those carrying the Xa4 gene [19] . On the other hand, the IRBB7 line, which carries the Xa7 gene, shows more effective resistance at high temperatures [19] . In addition, studies have shown that the dominant Xa7 gene confers long-lasting, broad-spectrum resistance to Xoo [17] . The development of this gene in Beninese rice cultivars will therefore help to improve rice production under these changing climatic conditions.

The recessive xa13 gene is one of the most widely used genes in Asian breeding programs [20] . This gene induces resistance to the most virulent race of Xoo, unlike most of the R genes reported [21] . These genes can be integrated into sustainable management strategies for vascular bacterial disease of rice [22] . Identifying these genes would therefore represent a crucial step in developing cultivars resistant to Xoo.

According to the Beninese Catalog of Plant Species in Benin (CaBEV 2), there are 19 improved rice varieties adapted to the agroecological conditions of Benin commonly cultivated. We do not know whether the pathogen has already passed into these grown rice varieties, or if rice varieties are exposed to other bacteria such as Sphingomonas. Whereas the use of resistant varieties, carrying resistance genes, is the only highly effective and environmentally friendly way to control this disease [23] , no information is available on these Xoo resistance genes in rice varieties grown in Benin apart from the one we recently initiated. This study aims to identify Beninese Xoo strains, causing vascular leaf bacterial blight, and screen rice varieties grown in Benin for the major BLB resistance genes xa5, Xa7, xa13 and Xa21 genes in order to help ensure food security.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Collection of Diseased Leaves

Sixty-nine diseased leaves showing typical symptoms of leaf blight, notably yellow-brown discoloration along one of the two leaf blades, changing to brown to dark brown with age, were collected in the three phytogeographical zones of Benin where rice is mainly produced (Guinean, Sudano-Guinean and Sudanese zones) (Figure 1). Samples were collected using the random sampling method, from rice plants at the heading and approaching maturity stages, as the disease usually develops well at these stages of plant growth. Diseased leaves were detached and placed in a paper envelope. These envelopes were labelled with the variety name, location, sampling date, rice ecosystem, and geographic coordinates. The samples were finally transported to the laboratory and stored in the refrigerator for further processing. On the other hand, our collection of seventy-five rice accessions grown in Benin and three positive controls IRBB5, IRBB21, and IRBB60 were screened for the resistance genes (Table 1).

Figure 1. Map showing the collection area for rice leaves showing symptoms of BLB and identification areas of Xanthomonas oryzae and Sphingomonas sp. in the three zones.

Table 1. List of rice accessions used in the study.

2.2. Sowing and Sampling of Rice Leaves for DNA Extraction

Five Paddy rice seeds of each variety of our collection were grown in germination pots in a greenhouse with a controlled environment for better growth conditions. They were watered as required for 10 to 15 days. The youngest leaves at the seedling stage (21 days) were removed with scissors and then wrapped in aluminium foil on which the pot references (name and code of the sample as well as the sampling date) were written. The samples were then stored in the refrigerator at 40˚C.

2.3. DNA Extraction from Collected Leaves Showing BLB Symptoms and from Leaves of Cultivated Rice Accessions of the Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Applied to Genomic

To extract total genomic DNA from the leaves, the CTAB protocol was performed according to the protocol of Djèdatin et al. [24] . Briefly, 200 mg of infected rice leaf was weighed and then ground in porcelain mortars with 1000 µL of CTAB pre-warmed to a temperature of 65˚C. The crushed material was then transferred to a 2 ml Eppendorf tube, followed by the addition of 50 µL of SDS and homogenization. The samples were incubated in an oven at 65˚C for 45 minutes and then allowed to cool to room temperature. Then 750 µL of CIA (Chloroform Isoamyl Alcohol) was added to each tube followed by gentle inversion shaking for 5 minutes, then centrifuged at 10,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 15 minutes. The supernatant from each sample was collected in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube bearing the same label. DNA precipitation was carried out by adding 800 µL of isopropanol at cold −20˚C with gentle homogenization by inversion. This was followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The aqueous solution was carefully removed so that the pellet was not damaged or lost. The pellet was then washed with 500 µL of 70% ethanol followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes: this was repeated three times to purify the DNA pellet. The tubes were opened and dried on blotting paper for a good while (overnight). Finally, a suspension of the dried of dried DNA was made by adding 100 µL of pure, sterile H2O, then stored at −20˚C.

2.4. Control of Total Genomic DNA Quality by Electrophoresis

The quality of the DNA was checked by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. Indeed, a mixture of 3 µL of extract of Total DNA and 8 µL of 2× loading blue was migrated at 100 Volts (V) for 30 min in Tris Bromate EDTA buffer (TBE). After migration, the gel was put in ethidium bromide (0.1% BET) solution for 15 min then rinsed with distilled water for five min. Then, the gel was visualized on a UV trans-illuminator. Finally, dilution of the DNA was carried out and stored at 4˚C for subsequent tests of DNA.

2.5. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Design Methodology for Xanthomonas oryzae Pv oryzae Identification

Bacteria were identified on the leaves showing symptoms of BLB by amplification of X. oryzae and X. oryzae pv. orysae hypothetical protein specific sequences using specific primers [25] listed in Table 2. Samples of diseased leaves with a sequence of 331 Pb different from the expected 272 Pb of Xo are tested with primers specific to Sphingomonas sp. [26] since previous studies have identified a sequence of approximately 270 Pb which corresponds to a sequence specific to Sphingomonas sp. The technique used is based on the PCR protocol described by Fanou et al. [27] . PCR was performed using a thermal cycler in 20 µL volumes containing a mixture of 1 × PCR buffer, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 0.2 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 50 - 200 ng genomic DNA, 2.0 - 3.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase, with sterilized distilled water added to 50 μL. The thermal cycler program consisted of 95˚C for 5 minutes followed by 25 cycles of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 54˚C and 2 min at 72˚C, and a final extension step at 72˚C for 5 min for X. oryzae. The thermal cycler program consisted of 95˚C for 5 minutes followed

Table 2. Sequences of primers used for identification of Xanthomonas oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and Sphingomonas sp.

by 25 cycles of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 52˚C and 2 min at 72˚C, and a final extension step at 72˚C for 5 min for X. oryzae pv. oryzae. For Sphingomonas sp., the thermal cycler program Composed of 95˚C for 5 minutes followed by 25 cycles of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 55˚C and 2 min at 72˚C, and a final extension step at 72˚C for 5 min.

2.6. Molecular Screening of Rice Accessions Cultivated in Benin for the Detection of Resistance Genes to Bacterial Leaf Blight Caused by Xanthomonas oryzae Pv. oryzae

Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed to identify resistance gene(s) among the selected accessions. Six co-segregating STS markers tightly linked to xa5, Xa7, xa13, and Xa21 [28] [29] [30] [31] were used (Table 3) for the detection of bacterial blight-resistant gene(s). Amplification was carried out in a thermal cycler according to the following program: pre-denaturation at 95˚C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles comprising denaturation at 94˚C for 1 min, hybridation at 51˚C (for the RM122 marker), 59˚C (for the M5 and xa13-prom markers), 55˚C and 57˚C (for the pTA248 marker) for 1 min, elongation at 72˚C for 2 min and final extension at 72˚C for 5 min.

2.7. Electrophoresis of PCR Products

The PCR products and a marker with a molecular weight of 100 bp were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis (at 1.5% for the pTA248 marker, 2% for M5 and xa13-prom, and 3% for the RM122 marker) in a solution of TBE (diluted 0.5×) at 120 V for 35 min. The gel was then subjected to UV light on a Transilluminator for visualization.

2.8. Data Analysis

The bands of the different amplicons were compared with those of the positive controls. Data were scored as “+” and “−” signifying the presence and absence of the target genes, respectively. The Excel 2016 workbook was used to make graphs to better analyze the data.

Table 3. Characteristics of microsatellites markers used to search for resistance genes.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Xanthomonas oryzae Pv. oryzae and Sphingomonas Sp. Identification

Bacterial blight is one of the most devastating diseases of rice worldwide and is found both in tropical and temperate regions. Bacterial leaf blight is caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo). The disease is ravaging Benin’s neighbouring countries, such as Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. In Benin, although the strain was reported in 2013 on the wild variety Oryza longistaminata, none study has been carried out in the country to check whether it has spread to currently cultivated varieties. In this study, leaves showing symptoms of BLB were analyzed by PCR for Xoo-specific sequences. Xanthomonas oryzae (Xo) was identified in Banikouara and Malanville (Alibori) with the presence of a band of 331 bp specific to the hypothetical protein of Xo. For certain leaves collected in the north and south of the country, bands of 272 bp different from those expected were identified on the agarose gel. Since the sequencing of amplicons of this size enabled kini et al., 2017 [26] to reveal a sequence specific to Sphingomonas sp. in their study, we used primers specific to Sphingomonas sp. to screen these samples. This confirmed Sphingomonas sp. (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The test did not reveal the specific Xoo band. This can be explained by the long storage time of the leaves in the freezer. Amplicon sequencing is required to clarify the pathovar of Xo. The presence of Xanthomonas oryzae in cultivated rice varieties in northern Benin (Alibori department) suggests a possible spread of pathogen from Oryza longistaminata to cultivated species since Xoo was observed on wild rice plants Oryza longistaminata in the town of Tanguiéta in Atacora department [7] , very near to Alibori. While global climate change is already having a potentially serious impact on rice production in Benin, the potential presence of Xoo in cultivated rice varieties will increase production losses. Local production will be practically non-existent. As a result, the price of imported rice will soar, making it unaffordable for the middle class. The Beninese government’s efforts to achieve food self-sufficiency will be fruitless.

Multiple rice fields located in Benin are infected by Sphingomonas sp. Coinfection Xoo-Sphingomonas sp. is observed in North-East of the country. Sphingomonas species have frequently been isolated from rice seeds [32] , but few are

Figure 2. Gel photos showing bands specific to Xo and Sphingomonas sp. (a): Bands of 312 pb of Xo Hypothetical protein. (b): Bands of 272 pb different from those of Xo. (c): Bands of 435 pb specific to sphingomonas.

recognized as plant pathogens. Particular attention should be focused on Sphingomonas sp. because of its Xoo-like symptoms on rice leaves.

3.2. Identification of Bacterial Leaf Blight Resistant Gene in Benin Rice Cultivated

The use of varieties carrying resistance genes has been considered to be the best method of controlling vascular bacterial disease in rice. The present study consisted of screening of 75 rice accessions collected in Benin in order to identify those possessing the xa5, Xa7, xa13 and Xa21 genes. Microsatellites markers were used because of their proven effectiveness in numerous studies. Indeed, the use of these markers enabled Djèdatin et al. [24] to determine genetic diversity between rice varieties grown in the Atacora region. A similar study has enabled to identify and differentiate Xoo-susceptible and Xoo-resistant individuals [33] . The results of these authors show that microsatellites are the markers of choice for these studies. In our work, the markers M5 (XA7), xa13-prom (xa13), pTA248 (XA21) and RM 122 (xa5) were used. Molecular screening of the 75 rice accessions collected in Benin and the three positive controls IRBB5, IRBB21 and IRBB60 revealed the presence of three alleles of the Xa21 gene, two alleles of the xa13 gene, one allele of the Xa7 gene and two alleles of the xa5 gene (Figure 3). On the one hand, there are Xoo sensitivity alleles (S) with bands of 730 bp for Xa21, 220 bp for xa13, 1170 bp for Xa7 and 230 bp for xa5. On the other hand, we observed Xoo resistance alleles (R) with bands of 1100 bp or 925 bp for Xa21, 450 bp for xa13 and 240 bp for xa5. (Figure 3 and Table 4). These different band sizes obtained for each of the markers used indicate the polymorphism of the microsatellites. Similar results were obtained by [29] - [35] , who used the same

Figure 3. Representative gel pictures showing amplification patterns generated by different STS markers used in the study. (a): MR122 Marker (xa5 gene linked); (b): M5 marker (Xa7 gene linked); (c): pTA248 marker (Xa21 gene linked); (d): xa13-prom marker (xa13 gene linked).

Table 4. Types, genotypes and phenotypes of the rice varieties screened for bacterial leaf blight resistance genes.

Legend: +: Presence; −: Absence; ∅: Absence of gene; Positive controls: isogenic lines normally carrying the desired resistance alleles; Red color: accessions carrying two resistance genes; Sky-blue color: accessions used as controls; Nude Blue color: recessive homozygotes accessions (for the recessive xa5 gene) and dominant heterozygotes and homozygotes accessions (for the dominant Xa21 gene).

markers to amplify fragments of similar size. The results of the present study thus confirm the efficiency of the M5, xa13-prom, pTA248, and RM 122 markers in the selection of BLB-resistant rice varieties in Benin.

This study showed that 47 (62.66%) accessions were resistant to Xoo, including 3 (4%) homozygous for xa5 resistance allele and 40 (53.33%) homozygous and heterozygous for the Xa21 resistance allele. On the other hand, 31 (41.33%) had only the 730 bp band, 66 (88%) had at least the 230 bp band and 75 (100%) had only the 1170 bp and 220 bp bands, corresponding to the susceptibility alleles indicating the susceptibility of these varieties to the pathogen (Figure 3 and Table 4). Similar results were obtained by Dossa et al. [36] who, using the same M5 marker and did not obtain the Xa7 resistance allele in any of the O. glaberrima accessions tested. Moreover, the xa13 resistance allele was also absent in all the O. glaberrima accessions [36] , suggesting that O. glaberrima lacks the resistance allele of the Xa7 and xa13 genes. Our results therefore concur with those of this author and suggest that the accessions tested are probably O. glaberrima. However, these results differ from those of Ullah et al. [33] , who obtained high poly-morphism in the 57 cultivars tested. This result can be explained by the fact that the accessions used in these studies were different. Among the 47 resistant accessions, Bagou 22, Bagou 24, Kpatab 100, and Foun15 carry both the xa5 and Xa21 genes (Table 4). The identification of known resistant varieties will enable to made concrete recommendations to farmers in the event of a BLB epidemic in Benin. Breeders will also be persuaded to start rice breeding programs for BLB resistance. The combination of these two genes would confer maximum and long-lasting resistance against a broad spectrum of Xoo pathotypes [37] . The Tchaka 36 variety did not show any alleles of the Xa21 gene. Similarly, varieties such as Koum 50 and Bagou 28 did not show either allele of the xa5 gene (Table 4). This can be explained by the fact that the xa5 and Xa21 genes are not present in all the rice varieties or accessions grown in Benin.

In addition to genetic factors such as resistance genes, it is crucial to consider the influence of environmental conditions and cultural practices on the prevalence and severity of (Xoo) induced (BLB). Environmental factors like temperature [38] , humidity [39] [40] , and rainfall patterns play a pivotal role in creating favorable conditions for Xoo infection and disease development [40] [41] [42] . Understanding the seasonal variations and microclimates within rice-growing regions in Benin can provide insights into disease dynamics. Moreover, cultural practices, including irrigation methods, planting densities, and crop rotation, can significantly affect the vulnerability of rice crops to BLB. An integrated approach that combines genetic resistance with tailored agronomic practices, taking into account the local environmental context, is essential to effectively manage BLB and enhance rice production in Benin.

Furthermore, the isogenic line IRBB21 supposed to be positive control in the present study and which according to the literature [36] should present a band of 1100 bp or 925 bp corresponding to the resistance allele [43] , presented sensitivity allele with a band of 730 bp (Figure 3(c) and Table 4). Similarly, the isogenic line IRBB60, considered as a positive control for the xa5 and xa13 genes, showed two bands for each gene instead of just one (Figures 3(a)-(c) and Table 4). This result therefore indicates that the IRBB60 line used in this study could be susceptible to vascular bacterial disease in a real environment and cannot be considered as a positive control for the xa5 and xa13 genes. However, it is possible that this is a second resistance allele or another allele that is not involved in BLB resistance. These results differ from previous studies [3] [44] which only obtained the 240 bp band for xa5 and the 450 bp band for xa13 respectively. These results can be explained by gene flow during seed multiplication in the field, a problem with the conservation (purity) of these lines, or genetic drift resulting in the loss of the xa5, xa13, and Xa21 resistance alleles by the isogenic lines IRBB60 and IRBB21 respectively. Crossing over events could therefore have generated individuals lacking the gene.

Amplification of Xa21 performed at 55˚C produced a multitude of bands of around 500 bp and 400 bp presented by accessions 4 and 47. On the other hand, amplification of the DNAs of these same individuals at a temperature of 57˚C produced only the expected bands. These results suggest that increasing the temperature eliminated all the non-specific sequences that were amplified (Figure 4). In fact, these 500 bp bands obtained by [45] in a similar study after

Figure 4. Representative gel pictures showing amplification patterns generated by pTA248 marker (Xa21 gene linked) at 55˚C and 57˚C. (a): Amplification at 55˚C. (b): Amplification at 57˚C.

an amplification at 55˚C and considered as bands corresponding to the sensitivity allele, would be due to a non-specific amplification.

In total, Xoo is probably already present in local rice varieties in Benin. Xo strains must be isolated from leaves and sequenced for better identification of Xoo. In view of the results, there is considerable genetic diversity in resistance to bacterial blight in Benin. Accessions, Bagou 22, Bagou 24, Kpatab 100 and Foun 15 carrying both the xa5 and Xa21 resistance allele should be considered for varietal improvement. The control of the seeds exchanged between farmers can also significantly reduce the risk of BLB in the country. Pathogenicity tests of Xoo strains from Benin and those from Burkina Faso, Niger, and Ivory Coast on the resistant accessions identified are necessary to assess the expression of this resistance gene in a real environment and above all the behavior of heterozygous individuals to analyze their resistance level to the plant pathogen.

4. Conclusion

This study reveals the presence of Xo in accessions in northern Benin, suggesting a possible spread of the Oryza longistaminata pathogen to cultivated species. It is also clear that Sphingomonas sp. infection, which also causes rice leaf scorch, is also taking hold in the country. The SSR markers used have proved effective in identifying cultivars carrying multiple resistance genes, since the epistasis effect has rendered the conventional approach ineffective. The results will be very useful to rice breeders as they will be able to develop resistant varieties easily. Accessions possessing both the xa5 and Xa21 genes can be directly disseminated in Beninese agriculture or used as donor parents for the development of sustainable bacterial-resistant varieties in breeding programs after confirmation by phenotypic screening. The data obtained reports the absence of two major resistance genes, Xa7, and xa13, which are effective against a broad spectrum of Xoo pathotypes in Beninese rice production. It would be important to introgress these two genes into elite rice varieties produced in Benin in perspective to provide effective control of BLB in the event of an epidemic in the country. The extension of this study to other BLB resistance genes and the isolation of Beninese Xoo for their characterization would also be necessary.

Acknowledgements

This research received financial support from The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) (No 21-106 RG/BIO/AF/AC_I_FR3240319477). The authors thank all the research team of the Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Applied to Genomics Laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Mew, T.W., Alvarez, A.M., Leach, J.E. and Swings, J. (1993) Focus on Bacterial Blight of Rice. Plant Disease, 77, 5-12.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-77-0005
[2] Sere, Y., Onasanya, A., Verdier, V., Akator, K., Ouedraogo, L.S., Segda, Z., Mbare, M.M., Sido, A.Y. and Baso, A. (2005) Rice Bacterial Leaf Blight in West Africa: Preliminary Studies on Disease in Farmer’s Field and Screening. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 4, 577-579.
https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2005.577.579
[3] Gonzalez, C., Szurek, B., Manceau, C., Mathieu, T., Séré, Y. and Verdier, V. (2007) Molecular and Pathotypic Characterization of New Xanthomonas oryzae Strains from West Africa. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 20, 534-546.
https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-5-0534
[4] Willocquet, L., Elazegui, F.A., Castilla, N., Fernandez, L., Fischer, K.S., Peng, S.B., Teng, P.S., Srivastava, R.K., Singh, H.M., Zhu, D.F. and Savary, S. (2004) Research Priorities for Rice Pest Management in Tropical Asia: A Simulation Analysis of Yield Losses and Management Efficiencies. Phytopathology, 94, 672-682.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.7.672
[5] FAO (2020).
https://www.fao.org.com
[6] Pandey, M.K., Shobha, R.N., Sundaram, R., Laha, G., Madhav, M., Srinivasa, R.K., Sudharshan, I., Hari, Y., Varaprasad, G. and Subba, R.L. (2013) Improvement of Two Traditional Basmati Rice Varieties for Bacterial Blight Resistance and Plant Stature through Morphological and Marker-Assisted Selection. Molecular Breeding, 31, 239-246.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9779-7
[7] Afolabi, O., Amoussa, R., Bilé, M., Oludare, A., Gbogbo, V., Poulin, L., Koebnik, R., Szurek, B. and Silué, D. (2016) First Report of Bacterial Leaf Blight of Rice Caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in Benin. Plant Disease, 10, 515.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-15-0821-PDN
[8] Islam, Md.R., Alam, Md.S., Khan, A.I., Hossain, I., Adam, L.R. and Daayf, F. (2016) Analyses of Genetic Diversity of Bacterial Blight Pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae Using IS1112 in Bangladesh. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 339, 399-407.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2016.06.002
[9] Mundt, C.C. (2014) Durable Resistance: A Key to Sustainable Management of Pathogens and Pests. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 27, 446-455.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.01.011
[10] Verdier, V. (2020) Characterization of New Races of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in Mali Informs Resistance Gene Deployment. Phytopathology, 110, 267-277.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-19-0070-R
[11] Gu, K., Yang, B., Tian, D., Wu, L., Wang, D., Sreekala, C., Yang, F., Chu, Z., Wang, G.L., White, F.F. and Yin, Z.R. (2005) Gene Expression Induced by a Type-III Effector Triggers Disease Resistance in Rice. Nature, 435, 1122-1125.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03630
[12] Chu, Z., Fu, B., Yang, H., Xu, C., Li, Z. and Sanchez, A. (2006) Targeting xa13, a Recessive Gene for Bacterial Blight Resistance in Rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 12, 455-461.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0145-6
[13] Mohiuddin, M.S., Rao, Y.P., Mohan, S.K. and Verma, J.P. (1976) Role of Leptocorisa acuta Thun in the Spread of Bacterial Blight of Rice. Current Science, 45, 426-427.
[14] Furuya, N., Taura, S., Goto, T., Thuy, B.T., Ton, P.H., Tsuchiya, K. and Yoshimura, A. (2012) Diversity in Virulence of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae from Northern Vietnam. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 46, 329-338.
https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.46.329
[15] Petpisit, V., Khush, G.S. and Kauffman, H.E. (1977) Inheritance of Resistance to Bacterial-Blight in Rice. Crop Science, 17, 551-554.
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700040018x
[16] Blair, M.W., Garris, A.J., Iyer, A.S., Chapman, B., Kresovich, S. and McCouch, S.R. (2003) High-Resolution Genetic Mapping and Candidate Gene Identification at the xa5 Locus for 44 Bacterial Blight Resistance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 107, 62-73.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1231-2
[17] Jiang, G.H., Xia, Z.H., Zhou, Y.L., Wan, J., Li, D.Y., Chen, R.S., Zhai, W.X. and Zhu, L.H. (2006) Testifying the Rice Bacterial Blight Resistance Gene xa5 by Genetic Complementation and Further Analyzing xa5 (Xa5) in Comparison with Its Homolog TFIIAγ1. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 275, 354-366.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-005-0091-7
[18] Chen, X., Liu, P., Mei, L., He, X., Chen, L., Liu, H., Shen, S., Ji, Z., Zheng, X. and Zhang, Y. (2021) Xa7, a New Executor R Gene That Confers Durable and Broad-Spectrum Resistance to Bacterial Blight Disease in Rice. Plant Communications, 2, Article ID: 100143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100143
[19] Dossa, G.S., Quibod, I., Atienza-Grande, G., Oliva, R., Maiss, E., Vera Cruz, C. and Wydra, K. (2020) Rice Pyramided Line IRBB67 (Xa4/Xa7) Homeostasis under Combined Stress of High Temperature and Bacterial Blight. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 683.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57499-5
[20] Khan, M.A., Naeem, M. and Iqbal, M. (2014) Breeding Approaches for Bacterial Leaf Blight Resistance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Current Status and Future Directions. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 139, 27-37.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0377-x
[21] Vikal, Y. and Bhatia, D. (2017) Genetics and Genomics of Bacterial Blight Resistance in Rice. Advances in International Rice Research, 10, 175-213.
https://doi.org/10.5772/67361
[22] Moumouni, B. (2007) Le flétrissement bactérien du riz au Niger: Diversité pathologique d’isolats collectés sur les périmètres irrigués. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 38, 2551-2563.
[23] Priya, L.B., Ujjal, K.N., Sharmistha, G., Gayatri, G., Shalim, U., Omar, M.A., Arafat, A.H., Alison, M.L., Yong-Ming, G. and Akbar, H. (2021) Introgression of Bacterial Blight Resistance Genes in the Rice Cultivar Ciherang: Response against Xan-thomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in the F6 Generation. Plants, 10, Article No. 2048.
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102048
[24] Djèdatin, G., Nanoukon, C., Missihoun, A., Lomou, M., Sedah, P. and Agbangla, C. (2022) Molecular Identification of Xa4 Resistance Gene to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in Cultivated Rice in Northwest Benin. Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research, 15, 11-22.
https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2022/v15i430162
[25] Lang, J.M., Hamilton, J.P., Diaz, M.G.Q., Van Sluys, M.A.M., Burgos, R.G., Vera Cruz, C.M., Buell, Tisserat, C.R. and Leach, N.A. (2010) Genomics-Based Diagnostic Marker Development for Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and X. oryzae pv. oryzicola. Plant Disease, 94, 311-319.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-3-0311
[26] Kini, K., Agnimonhan, R., Dossa, R., Soglonou, B., Gbogbo, V., Ouedraogo, I., Kpemoua, K., Traoré, M. and Silue, D. (2017) First Report of Sphingomonas sp. Causing Bacterial Leaf Blight of Rice in Benin, Burkina Faso, the Gambia, Ivory Coast, Mali, Nigeria, Tanzania and Togo. New Disease Reports. 35, 32.
https://doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2017.035.032
[27] Fanou, A.A., Missihoun, A.A., Sovegnon, P., Behoundja-Kotoko, O., Baimey, H. and Agbangla, C. (2019) Molecular Genetic Identification of Viruses Affecting Pepper Crop (Capsicum spp.) in Western North of Benin. International Journal of Current Research, 6, 9-14.
https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrbp.2019.603.002
[28] Chen, X., Temnykh, S., Xu, Y., Cho, Y. and McCouch, S. (2017) Development of a Microsatellite Framework Map Providing Genome-Wide Coverage in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 95, 553-567.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050596
[29] Porter, B., Chittoor, J., Yano, M., Sasaki, T. and White, F. (2023) Development and Mapping of Markers Linked to the Rice Bacterial Blight Resistance Gene Xa7. Crop Science, 43, 1484-1492.
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1484
[30] Hajira, S.K., Sundaram, R.M., Laha, G.S., Yugander, A., Balachandran, S.M., Viraktamath, B.C., Sujatha, K., Balachi-ranjeevi, C.H., Pranathi, K. and Anila, M. (2016) A Single-Tube, Functional Marker-Based Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Major Bacterial Blight Resistance Genes Xa21, xa13 and xa5 in Rice. Rice Science, 23, 144-151.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.11.004
[31] Luo, Y.-C., Wang, S.-H., Li, C.-Q., et al. (2004) Improvement of Resistance to Bacterial Blight by Marker-Assisted Selection in a Wide Compatibility Restorer Line of Hybrid Rice. Rice Science, 11, 231.
[32] Midha, S., Bansal, K., Sharma, S., Kumar, N., Patil, N.P., Chaudhry, V. and Patil, P.B. (2016) Genomic Resource of Rice Seed Associated Bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article No. 1551.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01551
[33] Ullah, I., Jamil, S., Iqbal, M., Shaheen, H., Hasni, S., Jabeen, S., Mehmood, A. and Akhter, M. (2012) Detection of Bacterial Blight Resistance Genes in Basmati Rice Landraces. Genetics and Molecular Research, 11, 1960-1966.
https://doi.org/10.4238/2012.July.20.1
[34] Sabar, M., Bibi, T., Farooq, H.U., Haider, Z., Naseem, I., Mahmood, A. and Akhter, M. (2016) Molecular Screening of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Germplasm for Xa4, xa5 and Xa21 Bacterial Leaf Blight (BLB) Resistant Genes Using Linked Marker Approach. African Journal of Biotechnology, 15, 2317-2324.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2016.15612
[35] Kamhun, W., Phengam, S., Uppananchai, T., Ratanasut, K. and Rungrat, T. (2022) Effects of Nitrogen Levels on Sucrose Content, Disease Severity of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and Yield of Hybrid Rice (BC4F5). Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 56, 909-916.
https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2022.56.5.05
[36] Dossa, G.S., Oliva, R., Maiss, E., Vera Cruz, C. and Wydra, K. (2016) High Temperature Enhances the Resistance of Cultivated African Rice, Oryza glaberrima, to Bacterial Blight. Plant Disease, 100, 380-387.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0536-RE
[37] Suh, J.P., Jeung, J.U., Noh, T.H., Cho, Y.C., Park, S.H., Park, H.S., Shin, M.S., Kim, C.K. and Jena, K.K. (2013) Development of Breeding Lines with Three Pyramided Resistance Genes That Confer Broad-Spectrum Bacterial Blight Resistance and Their Molecular Analysis in Rice. Rice, 6, Article No. 5.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-6-5
[38] Chirinos, J., Olivares, B. and Guevara, E. (2013) Biological Effectiveness of Plant Extracts in in Vitro Control of the Phytopathogenic Xanthomonas Bacterium. Multiciencias, 13, 115-121.
https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/904/90428841002.pdf
[39] Paredes-Trejo, F., Campos, B., Movil Fuentes, Y., Arevalo-Groening, J. and Gil, A. (2023) Assessing the Spatiotemporal Patterns and Impacts of Droughts in the Orinoco River Basin Using Earth Observations Data and Surface Observations. Hydrology, 10, Article No. 195.
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10100195
[40] Rodríguez-Yzquierdo, G., Olivares, O., Silva-Escobar, O., González-Ulloa, A., Soto-Suarez, M. and Betancourt-Vásquez, M. (2023) Mapping of the Susceptibility of Colombian Musaceae Lands to a Deadly Disease: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4. Horticulturae, 9, Article No. 757.
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070757
[41] Vega, A., Orlando, O., Rueda Calderón, M.A., Montenegro-Gracia, E., Araya-Almán, M. and Marys, E. (2022) Prediction of Banana Production Using Epidemiological Parameters of Black Sigatoka: An Application with Random Forest. Sustainability, 14, Article No. 14123.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114123
[42] Olivares, B.O., Vega, A., Calderón, M.A.R., Rey, J.C., Lobo, D., Gómez, J.A. and Landa, B.B. (2022) Identification of Soil Properties Associated with the Incidence of Banana Wilt Using Supervised Methods. Plants, 11, Article No. 2070.
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11152070
[43] Ronald, P.C., Albano, B., Tabien, R., Abenes, L., Wu, K., McCouch, S. and Tanksley, S.D. (1992) Genetic and Physical Analysis of the Rice Bacterial Blight Disease Resistance Locus, Xa21. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 236, 113-120.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279649
[44] Ramalingam, J., Raveendra, C., Savitha, P., Vidya, V., Chaithra, T.L., Velprabakaran, S., Saraswathi, R., Ramanathan, A., Arumugam Pillai, M.P. and Arumugachamy, S. (2020) Gene Pyramiding for Achieving Enhanced Resistance to Bacterial Blight, Blast, and Sheath Blight Diseases in Rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, Article ID: 591457.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.591457
[45] Krishnakumar, R. and Kumaravadivel, N. (2018) Marker-Assisted Selection for Biotic Stress (Bacterial Leaf Blight and Gall Midge) Tolerance in Bc4F4 Generation of Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 9, 275-282.
https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00032.7

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.