Early Specialization or Early Athletic Competencies? Literature Update and Methodological Considerations

Abstract

The early sport specialization is characterized as intensive year-round training and/or competition, involving participation in a single sport that typically begins in the prepubertal years. In recent years, most of the major national societies and international sports and athletic associations, federations, and organizations have released position statements advising against the practice of early specialization amongst youth sports. Youth sports training must necessarily take into account the cultural and social factors of each country. Over the last decades, several development models have been structured, integrated, and implemented, predominantly focusing upon the idea of the sporting talent model and framework. The practitioners emphasised the importance of variety and participation in a large range of sports and activities. This was identified as fundamental and a key aspect of long-term athletic development for developing well-rounded athletes whilst reducing burnout in one sport. This study describes the change in the methodological paradigm in the youth sports training model by analyzing the most recent literature; it aims to describe the methodological orientation that must distinguish long-term training from the risk of early specialization.

Share and Cite:

Sannicandro, I. and D’Elia, F. (2022) Early Specialization or Early Athletic Competencies? Literature Update and Methodological Considerations. Advances in Physical Education, 12, 349-360. doi: 10.4236/ape.2022.124026.

1. Introduction

The early sport specialization is a feature that characterizes youth sports practice.

The early sport specialization is characterized as intensive year-round (>8 months per year) training and/or competition, involving participation in a single sport that typically begins in the prepubertal years (LaPrade et al., 2016; Mosher et al., 2020; Moeskops et al., 2022). Early specializing young athletes can be exposed to intensive training schedules with high volumes and frequencies; this chronic exposure to the same sporting skills may limit diversified skill acquisition and reduce long-term participation in sports (Mosher et al., 2020; Moeskops et al., 2022). Notably, these athletes often accumulate weekly training hours which surpass the recommendations of not exceeding the child’s chronological age in years (Brink et al., 2014; LaPrade et al., 2016; Root et al., 2019; Moeskops et al., 2022).

The hypothesis that earlier specialization increases the likelihood of eventually achieving elite sport performance mainly comes from research using the “deliberate practice framework(Ericsson et al., 1993). As the name suggests, this framework emphasizes the time spent in training and proposes a monotonic relationship between hours spent engaging in effortful, domain-specific (i.e. sport-specific) “deliberate practice” and performance (Mosher et al., 2022; Gabbett, 2022).

The study that clarifies the terms of the question and analyzes the topic according to the most significant scientific evidence is an interesting review of 2020 (Mosher et al., 2020): before this analysis, the discussion in this area is driven by non-data-driven, commentaries, editorials, and reviews, which undermines the extent to which recommendations about early specialization can be seen as evidence-based.

In fact, this review underlines how only 37% of the literature included data-driven studies that were explicitly designed to advance our understanding of early specialization specifically, with 43% of the papers comprised of editorials, commentaries, or reviews (Mosher et al., 2020).

This study aims to analyze the concept of early specialization, integrate some methodological reflections and suggest a model that can ensure a competitive experience for young athletes while protecting their health.

2. Specialization: Types and Levels

The sports specialization can be classified and distinguished on the basis of certain scales of determination.

An interesting review described the tools used and some limitations in the use of these measurement tools (Mosher et al., 2020).

The most commonly used scale is Sport Specialization Scale, which uses three criteria (Jayanthi et al., 2015): 1) single sport training, 2) exclusion of other sports, and 3) year-round training (>8 months) to rank athletes as low (having only one of the criteria), moderate (two of three) or high on specialization (all three). Over 30% of the data-driven specialization-specific studies in a recent review used this scale, despite concerns about the validity of this scale (Smith et al., 2017). For example, with this scale, a recreational athlete who participates once a week for 2 h in basketball, but quit soccer at age seven, would be regarded as more specialized than a competitive basketball player who participates for 6 h a week but only ever participated in basketball, despite the fact that most practitioners would be more concerned about the latter. Furthermore, 20% of studies in the cited review used only a single item to measure specialization, raising further concerns about whether a single item is nuanced enough to adequately capture this multi-faceted concept (Mosher et al., 2020). According to this review, 18 different approaches have been used to determine specialization status often inconsistently categorizing athletes (Mosher et al., 2020). For instance, one study compared a self-classification method (i.e. are you a single sport or multi-sport athlete) to the 3-point Sport Specialization Scale, resulting in only 38% agreement on the athletes’ categorization and differing results on the relationships between specialization status and injury history (Bell et al., 2016).

The specialization average age and percentage of athletes who specialized varied considerably across the different sports. In fact, 73% gymnasts and 54% figure skaters specialized at the youngest age (age range 8 - 10 years), whereas 86% of hockey players specialized on average at 12.5 years of age (Martin et al., 2017; Moeskops et al., 2022). To these data it should be added that recent literature reviews have investigated the impact of early specialization on career and task-specific athletic performance and concluded that sport specialization was not a prerequisite for success at more elite levels (Kliethermes et al., 2020; Rees et al., 2016; LaPrade et al., 2016). In recent years, most of the major national societies and international sport and athletic associations, national federations, and organizations have released position statements advising against the practice of early specialization amongst youth sport (e.g. American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, International Society of Sport Psychology, National Association for Sports and Physical Education). When the official positions of so many associations are in agreement, everyone is really faced with a phenomenon that is dangerous for the young athlete health that must be hindered in every context (Mosher et al., 2020). Therefore, there is emergent consensus among researchers and practitioners opposing an early specialization approach, owing to the associated potential negative effects on children and adolescents’ physical and psychosocial wellbeing (Moeskops et al., 2022; Mosher et al., 2020; Raiola, 2017; Faigenbaum et al., 2016; Myer et al., 2016; Lloyd et al., 2016; Mostafavifar et al., 2013).

3. Can Coexist the Health and Performance in Youth Training?

When designing training plans to enhance performance conducting a thorough need analysis of the sport’s demands (physiological and biomechanical) and types of activities, the early specializing athlete will be frequently exposed to is important (Feeley et al., 2016; Wilhelm et al., 2017; Iona et al., 2022).

Technical staff should consider injury epidemiology within the sport to identify common overuse injury sites, areas prone to strength and mobility deficiencies, postural issues, and limb asymmetries (Sannicandro et al., 2014; Sannicandro & Raiola, 2021a, 2021b, 2022; Gonzalo-Skok et al., 2022). The literature highlight that an overuse injuries can be prevalent in early specializing athletes (Jayanthi et al., 2019, 2020), and the practitioners should implement practice that includes a large amount of movement variability, to provide exposure to a variety of movement patterns to vary the force application and coordination demands (Varghese et al., 2022).

Furthermore, if growth-related injuries are prevalent in the sport, practitioners should also be aware of the underpinning mechanisms and the signs and symptoms associated with these injuries (Dicesare et al., 2019).

Based on literature data, athletes who trained for their sport more hours per week than their chronological age had a greater risk of serious overuse injuries than those training fewer hours than their age (odds ratio, 2.07) on multivariate analysis (Jayanthi et al., 2019, 2020).

In fact, it is recommended to limiting weekly training hours to fewer than the athlete’s age to reduce the injury risk (Jayanthi et al., 2019, 2020).

Add to these data that a sports training ratio (weekly hours in organized sports/weekly hours in free play) was calculated based on reported weekly training hours to provide another clinical tool regarding the training risk and type of physical activity. In the literature it is recommended that this ratio not exceed 2:1, as the odd ratio of serious overuse injuries was 1.87 on multivariate analysis (Jayanthi et al., 2015).

The relationship between load monitoring, diversification of motor tasks/methods, and the risk of injury is very significant.

A key role for practitioners working with early specializing athletes is to assist with monitoring of internal and external training loads, as well as using screening tools for indicators of overtraining (poor quality of night sleep, fatigue, reduced performance etc.) and burnout (Whatman et al., 2021; Myer et al., 2016).

The specific literature have monitored training loads over 41 weeks in young athletes from various sports and reported intensity during the week before injury was significantly higher compared with that of the preceding 4 weeks (Malisoux et al., 2013). The training load “spikes” role on injury risk in youth was evaluated in a 2-year study in male youth cricketers monitored acute and chronic workloads of bowling sessions and found that “spikes” in workloads were associated with increased injury risk (Warren et al., 2018).

Specifically, an increase in acute and chronic workloads of more than 2 standard deviations resulted in a 4 - 5 fold increase in injury risk in the subsequent 4 weeks (Moeskops et al., 2022).

The data from this study can be useful to guide the planning of training workloads around different seasons and competition demands to ensure sufficient chronic workloads are maintained, while minimizing spikes in workload (Moeskops et al., 2022).

However, it must be considered that this is likely to be more challenging in certain sports than others; nevertheless, with such an approach, acute and chronic training loads could be managed more carefully. Indeed, the organization and monitoring of weekly training loads is a complex process and can be challenging owing to individual fluctuations in overall training loads; it is the case of the complexity of load management with school physical education, recreational activity, competition loads, etc. as well as the heterogeneity with which each one adapts and responds to workloads (Nobari et al., 2021; Scantlebury et al., 2020; Schwellnus et al., 2016; Esposito & Raiola, 2020).

The control of the load must also be associated with a modulation of the teaching styles (Colella & D’Arando, 2021; Invernizzi et al., 2022; Sannicandro & Raiola, 2022) which have a direct relationship with the volume and intensity of the load.

4. Discussion: Is It Possible to Think of Alternative Models in Youth Sports Training?

The youth sports training must necessarily take into account the cultural and social factors of each country: for example, the Italian model of youth training cannot be the same as the Swiss or French model.

The absence in Italy of specialized physical education teaching in the early years of schooling of children (3 - 11 years) must be considered an element that strongly conditions the identification and structuring of the youth sports training model.

Similarly, countries that have provided a significant volume of physical education hours in the 3 - 11 age brackets will have to think of a completely different model.

However, it is possible to identify methodological and didactic indications that can help guide the training of the young athletes.

Over the last decades, several development models have been structured, integrated and implemented, predominantly focusing upon the idea of sporting talent model and framework: Long-Term Athlete Development, LTAD, Developmental Model of Sports Participation, DMSP, Foundations, Talent, Elite and Mastery, FTEM (Varghese et al., 2022; Till & Baker, 2020; Balyi & Hamilton, 2004; Cotè & Vierimaa, 2014; Gulbin et al., 2013). In fact recent position statements and consensus have questioned the idea that these models should be limited to talented young sportsmen only, especially considering the large number of youth who experience recreational and competitive sport compared to elite sport and the requirement to extend the concept of health, fitness and physical activity for all youth (Till & Baker, 2020; Bergeron et al., 2015; Lloyd et al., 2015, 2016).

The concept of long-term athletic development was defined as the “habitual development of athleticism over time to improve health and fitness, enhance physical performance, reduce the relative risk of injury, and develop the confidence and competence of all youth(Lloyd et al., 2016). The NSCA position statement aimed to help foster a more unified and holistic approach to long-term athletic development, to promote the benefits of a lifetime of healthy physical activity, and to prevent and/or minimize sport and physical activity-related injuries.

The idea of plans providing a variety of opportunities was identified as vital for long-term athletic development. The sub themes related to multi-sport and multi-activity, movement development, physical development, task individualization and education are repeatedly referred in the LTAD (Varghese et al., 2022).

Practitioners emphasised the importance of “variety” and participation in a “large range of sports and activities(Sannicandro & Raiola, 2021a, 2021b; Varghese et al., 2022). This was identified as fundamental and a “key” aspect of long-term athletic development for growing “well rounded athletes” whilst reducing the burnout in one sport (Lloyd et al., 2015, 2016; Varghese et al., 2022).

The literature helps this analysis because it indicates LTAD as a model capable of reducing drop out and guaranteeing a sports experience that protects the young athlete health (Lloyd et al., 2016; De Borja et al., 2022; Moeskops et al., 2022; Jayanthi et al., 2022).

However, the concept of LTAD must be declined and calibrated in order to provide guidelines for technical staff: this clarification is necessary when considering the declining trends in physical fitness (Sandercock & Cohen, 2019), physical activity (Colella & D’Arando, 2021; Invernizzi et al., 2022; Tremblay et al., 2016) and motor skill development (Lawson et al., 2021; Bolger et al., 2019), alongside increased overweight and obesity prevalence (Gensthaler et al., 2022; Ogden et al., 2016) within youth populations.

The LTAD structure and idea also makes it possible to ensure a further qualitative parameter to the young athlete sporting experience: the opportunity of presenting various and diversified motor experiences that can form the basis for transferable learning (Sannicandro & Raiola, 2022; Williams et al., 2021; Moran et al., 2018; Granacher et al., 2016).

The diversification of motor tasks with the support of various external resistances and different surfaces (elastic bands, weight balls, dumbells, partners, unstable tools, perturbation tools, climbs, sand, etc.) allows you to increase muscle strength and encourage ever new coordinative adaptations.

The literature suggests that not only the practice volumes but above all the diversification of motor experiences can lead to an increase in efficiency and performance (Sannicandro & Raiola, 2021a; Varghese et al., 2022; Barth & Güllich, 2021; D’Isanto et al., 2021; Fischetti et al., 2019; Raiola & Altavilla, 2020; Invernizzi et al., 2022). Research on athletics practitioners has identified 4 elements that contribute to the increase in performance at a young age: 1) coach-led multi-sport practice in childhood/adolescence was a critical discriminator of the efficiency of adult practice and performance improvement; 2) The associations are not linear; 3) The likelihood of achieving high practical efficiency was greater when combining ~1000 - 2500 hours of athletics practice up to the age of 19 with ~1250 hours of practicing other sports up to the age of 19; 4) Peer-led activity in any sport has had negligible effects (Barth & Güllich, 2021).

The proposals deriving from the LTAD allow diversifying the motor experiences and satisfying the qualitative criteria described in the literature.

The LTAD proposals, therefore, can remedy any lack of diversified motor activities or the impossibility of practicing different sports.

5. Conclusion

In this context, LTAD tasks serve as an umbrella term for an array of these training interventions, incorporated within a plan of athletic development that includes exercises targeting muscular strength, mobility, balance, and impulsive movement (Williams et al., 2021; Filipa et al., 2010). Accordingly, enhancing athletic foundations in young athletes, and presenting a diversity of physical demands to the neuromuscular system are also considered important means of mitigating the risk of injury (Williams et al., 2021).

A key idea of LTAD programs is to improve movement competency. In light of this, the LTAD tasks can be considered important to the development of fundamental movement skills that are broadly defined as movement patterns that involve two or more body segments and commonly promoted in models of youth athletic development (Sannicandro & Raiola, 2021b; Liefeith et al., 2018; Morgan et al., 2013). Typically utilized in athletic settings, these fundamental movements have been assessed against criteria for desirable technical execution that are thought to be an indication of movement quality and proficiency (Williams et al., 2021; Morgan et al., 2013).

Alongside the methodological guidelines, a broader policy of monitoring the indicators that reveal the sport experience quality of young people must be promoted and implemented.

Levels of load exposure, training frequency, teaching styles, and quality of the methods implemented, maybe some of the determinants of a sports experience that is attentive to health and not only to performance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Balyi, I., & Hamilton, A. (2004). Long-Term Athlete Development: Trainability in Childhood and Adolescence. Olympic Coach, 16, 4-9.
[2] Barth, M., & Güllich, A. (2021). Non-Linear Association of Efficiency of Practice of Adult Elite Athletes with Their Youth Multi-Sport Practice. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39, 915-925.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1851900
[3] Bell, D. R., Post, E. G., Trigsted, S. M., Hetzel, S., McGuine, T. A., & Brooks, M. A. (2016). Prevalence of Sport Specialization in High School Athletics: A 1-Year Observational Study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 44, 1469-1474.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516629943
[4] Bergeron, M. F., Mountjoy, M., Armstrong, N., Chia, M., Coté, J., Emery, C. A., Faigenbaum, A., Hall, G., Jr. Kriemler, S., Léglise, M., Malina, R. M., Pensgaard, A. M., Sanchez, A., Soligard, T., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Van Mechelen, W., Weissensteiner, J. R., & Engebretsen, L. (2015). International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement on Youth Athletic Development. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49, 843-851.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094962
[5] Bolger, L. A., Bolger, L. E., O’Neill, C., Coughlan, E., Lacey, S., O’Brien, W., & Burns, C. (2019). Fundamental Movement Skill Proficiency and Health among a Cohort of Irish Primary School Children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 90, 24-35.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2018.1563271
[6] Brink, M., Frencken, W., Jordet, G., & Lemmink, K. (2014). Coaches’ and Players’ Perceptions of Training Dose: Not a Perfect Match. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9, 497-502.
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0009
[7] Colella, D., & D’Arando, C. (2021). Teaching Styles and Outdoor Education to Promote Non-Linear Learning. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 507-513.
[8] Cotè, J., & Vierimaa, M. (2014). The Developmental Model of Sport Participation: 15 Years after Its First Conceptualization. Science & Sports, 29, S63-S69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2014.08.133
[9] D’Isanto, T., Di Domenico, F., D’Elia, F., Aliberti, S., & Esposito, G. (2021). The Effectiveness of Constraints-Led Training on Skill Development in Football. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9, 1344-1351.
https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090630
[10] De Borja, C., Chang, C. J., Watkins, R., & Senter, C. (2022). Optimizing Health and Athletic for Women. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 15, 10-20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-021-09735-2
[11] DiCesare, C. A., Montalvo, A., Barber Foss, K. D., Thomas, S. M., Ford, K. R., Hewett, T. E., Jayanthi, N. A., Stracciolini, A., Bell, D. R., & Myer, G. D. (2019). Lower Extremity Biomechanics Are Altered across Maturation in Sport-Specialized Female Adolescent Athletes. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 7, Article 268.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00268
[12] Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
[13] Esposito, G., & Raiola, G. (2020). Monitoring the Performance and Technique Consolidation in Youth Football Players. Trends in Sport Sciences, 27, 93-100.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094621
[14] Faigenbaum, A. D., Lloyd, R. S., MacDonald, J., & Myer, G. D. (2016). Citius, Altius, Fortius: Beneficial Effects of Resistance Training for Young Athletes: Narrative Review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50, 3-7.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515576899
[15] Feeley, B. T., Agel, J., & LaPrade, R. F. (2016). When Is It Too Early for Single Sport Specialization? The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 44, 234-241.
https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3325
[16] Filipa, A., Byrnes, R., Paterno, M. V., Myer, G. D., & Hewett, T. E. (2010). Neuromuscular Training Improves Performance on the Star Excursion Balance Test in Young Female Athletes. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 40, 551-558.
[17] Fischetti, F., Cataldi, S., & Greco, G. (2019). Lower-Limb Plyometric Training Improves Vertical Jump and Agility Abilities in Adult Female Soccer Players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19, 1254-1261.
[18] Gabbett, T. (2022). Training the Adolescent Athlete. Sports Health, 14, 11-12.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211058410
[19] Gensthaler, L., Felsenreich, D. M., Jedamzik, J., Eichelter, J., Nixdorf, L., Bichler, C., Krebs, M., Itariu, B., Langer, F. B., & Prager, G. (2022). Trends of Overweight and Obesity in Male Adolescents: Prevalence, Socioeconomic Status, and Impact on Cardiovascular Risk in a Central European Country. Obesity Surgery, 32, 1024-1033.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05867-z
[20] Gonzalo-Skok, O., Sánchez-Sabaté, J., Tous-Fajardo, J., Mendez-Villanueva, A., Bishop, C., & Piedrafita, E. (2022). Effects of Direction-Specific Training Interventions on Physical Performance and Inter-Limb Asymmetries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 1029.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031029
[21] Granacher, U., Lesinski, M., Büsch, D., Muehlbauer, T., Prieske, O., Puta, C., Gollhofer, A., & Behm, D. G. (2016). Effects of Resistance Training in Youth Athletes on Muscular Fitness and Athletic Performance: A Conceptual Model for Long-Term Athlete Development. Frontiers in Physiology, 7, Article 164.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00164
[22] Gulbin, J. P., Croser, M. J., Morley, E. J., & Weissensteiner J. R. (2013). An Integrated Framework for the Optimisation of Sport and Athlete Development: A Practitioner Approach. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31, 1319-1331.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.781661
[23] Invernizzi, P. L., Rigon, M.,Signorini, G., Colella, D., Trecroci, A., Formenti, D., & Scurati, R. (2022). Effects of Varied Practice Approach in Physical Education Teaching on Inhibitory Control and Reaction Time in Preadolescents. Sustainability, 14, Article 6455.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116455
[24] Iona, T., Raimo, S., Coco, D., Tortella, P., Masala, D., Ammendolia, A., Mannocci, A., & Torre, G. (2022). Specialization and Injury Risk in Different Youth Sports: A Bio-Emotional Social Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 818739.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818739
[25] Jayanthi, N. A., LaBella, C. R., Fischer, D., Pasulka, J., & Dugas, L. R. (2015). Sports-Specialized Intensive Training and the Risk of Injury in Young Athletes: A Clinical Case-Control Study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43, 794-801.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514567298
[26] Jayanthi, N. A., Post, E. G., Laury, T. C., & Fabricant, P. D. (2019). Health Consequences of Youth Sport Specialization. Journal of Athletic Training, 54, 1040-1049.
https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-380-18
[27] Jayanthi, N., Kleithermes, S., Dugas, L., Pasulka, J., Iqbal, S., & LaBella, C. (2020). Risk of Injuries Associated with Sport Specialization and Intense Training Patterns in Young Athletes: A Longitudinal Clinical Case-Control Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 8, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120922764
[28] Jayanthi, N., Schley, S., Cumming, S. P., Myer, G. D., Saffel, H., Hartwig, T., & Gabbett, T. J. (2022). Developmental Training Model for the Sport Specialized Youth Athlete: A Dynamic Strategy for Individualizing Load-Response during Maturation. Sports Health, 14, 142-153.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211056088
[29] Kliethermes, S. A., Nagle, K., Coté, J., Malina, R. M., Faigenbaum, A., Watson, A., Feeley, B., Marshall, S. W., LaBella, C. R., Herman, D. C., Tenforde, A., Beutler, A. I., & Jayanthi, N. (2020). Impact of Youth Sports Specialisation on Career and Task-Specific Athletic Performance: A Systematic Review Following the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) Collaborative Research Network’s 2019 Youth Early Sport Specialisation Summit. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54, 221-230.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101365
[30] LaPrade, R. F., Agel, J., Baker, J., Brenner, J. S., Cordasco, F. A., Coté, J., Engebretsen, L., Feeley, B. T., Gould, D., Hainline, B., Hewett, T., Jayanthi, N., Kocher, M. S., Myer, G. D., Nissen, C. W., Philippon, M. J., & Provencher, M. T. (2016). AOSSM Early Sport Specialization Consensus Statement. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 4, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116644241
[31] Lawson, C., Eyre, E., Tallis, J., & Duncan, M. J. (2021). Fundamental Movement Skill Proficiency among British Primary School Children: Analysis at a Behavioral Component Level. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128, 625-648.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512521990330
[32] Liefeith, A., Kiely, J., Collins, D., & Richards, J. (2018). Back to the Future—In Support of a Renewed Emphasis on Generic Agility Training within Sports-Specific Developmental Pathways. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36, 2250-2255.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1449088
[33] Lloyd, R. S., Cronin, J. B., Faigenbaum, A. D., Haff, G. G., Howard, R., Kraemer, W. J., Micheli, L. J., Myer, G. D., & Oliver, J. L. (2016). National Strength and Conditioning Association Position Statement on Long-Term Athletic Development. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30, 1491-1509.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001387
[34] Lloyd, R. S., Oliver, J. L., Faigenbaum, A. D., Howard, R., De Ste Croix, M. B., Williams, C. A., Best, T. M., Alvar, B. A., Micheli, L. J., Thomas, D. P., Hatfield, D. L., Cronin, J. B., & Myer, G. D. (2015). Long-Term Athletic Development, Part 2: Barriers to Success and Potential Solutions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29, 1451-1464.
https://doi.org/10.1519/01.JSC.0000465424.75389.56
[35] Malisoux, L., Frisch, A., Urhausen, A., Seil, R., & Theisen, D. (2013). Monitoring of Sport Participation and Injury Risk in Young Athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 16, 504-508.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.01.008
[36] Martin, E., Ewing, M., & Oregon, E. (2017). Sport Experiences of Division I Collegiate Athletes and Their Perceptions of the Importance of Specialization. High Ability Studies, 28, 149-165.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1292894
[37] Moeskops, S., Oliver, J. L., Read, J. P., Cronin, J. B., Myer, G. D., & Lloyd, R. S. (2022). Practical Strategies for Integrating Strength and Conditioning into Early Specialization Sports. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 44, 34-45.
https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000665
[38] Moran, J., Sandercock, G., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Clark, C., Fernandes, J., & Drury, B. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of Resistance Training in Female Youth: Its Effect on Muscular Strength, and Shortcomings in the Literature. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 48, 1661-1671.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0914-4
[39] Morgan, P. J., Barnett, L. M., Cliff, D. P., Okely, A. D., Scott, H. A., Cohen, K. E., & Lubans, D. R. (2013). Fundamental Movement Skill Interventions in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics, 132, e1361-e1383.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1167
[40] Mosher, A., Fraser-Thomas, J., & Baker, J. (2020). What Defines Early Specialization: A Systematic Review of Literature. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, Article 596229.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.596229
[41] Mosher, A., Till, K., Fraser-Thomas, J., & Baker, J. (2022). Revisiting Early Sport Specialization: What’s the Problem? Sports Health, 14, 13-19.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211049773
[42] Mostafavifar, A. M., Best, T. M., & Myer, G. D. (2013). Early Sport Specialisation, does It Lead to Long-Term Problems? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47, 1060-1061.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-092005
[43] Myer, G. D., Jayanthi, N., DiFiori, J. P., Faigenbaum, A. D., Kiefer, A. W., Logerstedt, D., & Micheli, L. J. (2016). Sports Specialization, Part II: Alternative Solutions to Early Sport Specialization in Youth Athletes. Sports Health, 8, 65-73.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738115614811
[44] Nobari, H., Kharatzadeh, M., Khalili, S. M., Pérez-Gómez, J., & Ardigò, L. P. (2021). Fluctuations of Training Load Variables in Elite Soccer Players U-14 throughout the Competition Season. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 9, Article No. 1418.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111418
[45] Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Lawman, H. G., Fryar, C. D., Kruszon-Moran, D., Kit, B. K., & Flegal, K. M. (2016). Trends in Obesity Prevalence among Children and Adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA, 315, 2292-2299.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6361
[46] Raiola, G. (2017). Motor Learning and Teaching Method. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17, 2239-2243.
[47] Raiola, G., & Altavilla, G. (2020). Testing Motor Skills, General and Special Coordinative, in Young Soccer. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 15, 206-212.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc2.11
[48] Rees, T., Hardy, L., Güllich, A., Abernethy, B., Coté, J., Woodman, T., Montgomery, H., Laing, S., & Warr, C. (2016). The Great British Medalists Project: A Review of Current Knowledge on the Development of the World’s Best Sporting Talent. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 46, 1041-1058.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0476-2
[49] Root, H., Marshall, A. N., Thatcher, A., Valier, A., Valovich McLeod, T. C., & Bay, R. C. (2019). Sport Specialization and Fitness and Functional Task Performance among Youth Competitive Gymnasts. Journal of Athletic Training, 54, 1095-1104.
https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-397-18
[50] Sandercock, G. R., & Cohen, D. D. (2019). Temporal Trends in Muscular Fitness of English 10-Year-Olds 1998-2014: An Allometric Approach. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22, 201-205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.020
[51] Sannicandro, I., & Raiola, G. (2022). What Training for the Young Soccer Player?—A Letter to Editor. Advances in Physical Education, 12, 75-77.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2022.122006
[52] Sannicandro, I., & Raiola, G. (2021a). Commentary: Development of Defensive Actions in Small-Sided and Conditioned Games with Offensive Purposes in Futsal. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 764995.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.764995
[53] Sannicandro, I., & Raiola, G. (2021b). Game Based and Multilateral Approach in Youth Soccer Training: A Choice So That Health and Sporting Targets Can Coexist. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 61, 1314-1315.
https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12247-9
[54] Sannicandro, I., Cofano, G., Rosa, R. A., & Piccinno, A. (2014). Balance Training Exercises Decrease Lower-Limb Strength Asymmetry in Young Tennis Players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 13, 397-402.
[55] Scantlebury, S., Till, K., Sawczuk, T., Phibbs, P., & Jones, B. (2020). Navigating the Complex Pathway of Youth Athletic Development; Challenges and Solutions to Managing the Training Load of Youth Team Sport Athletes. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 42, 100-108.
https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000564
[56] Schwellnus, M., Soligard, T., Alonso, J. M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T. J., Gleeson, M., Hagglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., Van Rensburg, C. J., Meeusen, R., Orchard, J. W., Pluim, B. M., Raftery, M., Budgett, R., & Engebretsen, L. (2016). How Much Is Too Much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement on Load in Sport and Risk of Illness. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50, 1043-1052.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572
[57] Smith, A. D., Alleyne, J. M., Pitsiladis, Y., Schneider, C., Kenihan, M., & Constantinou, D. (2017). Early Sports Specialization: An International Perspective. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 16, 439-442.
https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000425
[58] Till, K., & Baker, J. (2020). Challenges and [Possible] Solutions to Optimizing Talent Identification and Development in Sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 664.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00664
[59] Tremblay, M. S., Barnes, J. D., González, S. A., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Onywera, V. O., Reilly, J. J., Tomkinson, G. R., & Global Matrix 2.0 Research Team (2016). Global Matrix 2.0: Report Card Grades on the Physical Activity of Children and Youth Comparing 38 Countries. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 13, S343-S366.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0594
[60] Varghese, M., Ruparell, S., & LaBella, C. (2022). Youth Athlete Development Models: A Narrative Review. Sports Health, 14, 20-29.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211055396
[61] Warren, A., Williams, S., McCaig, S., & Trewartha, G. (2018). High Acute: Chronic Workloads Are Associated with Injury in England & Wales Cricket Board Development Programme Fast Bowlers. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21, 40-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.07.009
[62] Whatman, C., Van Den Berg, C., Palacios-Derflingher, L., & Emery, C. (2021). Sport Specialization, Physical Performance and Injury History in Canadian Junior High School Students. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 16, 1566-1574.
https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.29590
[63] Wilhelm, A., Choi, C., & Deitch, J. (2017). Early Sport Specialization: Effectiveness and Risk of Injury in Professional Baseball Players. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 5, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117728922
[64] Williams, M. D., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Chaabene, H., & Moran, J. (2021). Neuromuscular Training and Motor Control in Youth Athletes: A Meta-Analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128, 1975-1997.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211029006

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.