Usefulness of a Simple Protein-Energy Wasting Score for Predicting Hospitalization in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study ()
1. Introduction
Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) have various nutritional disorders due to the stepwise loss of body proteins and metabolic disorders [1]. Because malnutrition is a strong predictor of mortality in MHD patients, assessing their nutritional status is essential in managing these patients [2]. In 2008, the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) presented the concept of protein energy wasting (PEW) and proposed diagnostic criteria for PEW in MHD patients [3]. However, the proposed approach lacks versatility because it is difficult to assess the reduced muscle mass. To address this issue, a new and simplified scoring method using serum creatinine adjusted for body surface area (SCr/BSA) was proposed in 2014 [4].
Currently, there is no single gold standard marker for clinically evaluating nutritional status in MHD patients that are not affected by confounding factors and that can be measured by a method that is both simple and reproducible. Therefore, PEW has conventionally been evaluated based on the assessment of various factors. We previously proposed a new and simple PEW score that appears to be useful for assessing the risk of mortality in patients on MHD [5]. In the present study, we aimed to demonstrate the usefulness of this simple PEW score as a predictor of hospitalization in MHD patients.
2. Methods
2.1. Patients and Protocol
This was a single-center, prospective cohort study conducted over 24 months in Japan from June 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, at Shinjuku Ishikawa Clinic. The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ishikawa Clinic (No. 2-01-2017). All subjects gave informed consent to participate.
This study enrolled MHD patients who had been undergoing hemodialysis (HD) via an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for at least 6 months at Shinjuku Ishikawa Clinic. Exclusion criteria were malignancy, active inflammation, liver cirrhosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other severe illness.
All patients received HD 3 times a week. Blood pressure was measured in the recumbent position in a resting state, and the mean blood pressure during the 1-month period prior to enrollment was used for the analysis. The dry weight was targeted so as to achieve a normotensive edema-free state. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting blood glucose of ≥126 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of ≥6.5, or a history of medication with an oral hypoglycemic agent(s).
2.2. Laboratory and Nutritional Parameters
Blood sampling was performed before starting an HD session after overnight fasting. Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine, albumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured using an autoanalyzer (Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing body weight in kilograms by height squared in meters. Urea kinetics was assessed by measuring the blood-based dialysis parameter, Kt/V [6] , and the mean value of three measurements obtained during each of the 3 months before the start of the study was used in the analysis.
PEW score was determined by grading one selected item in each of four categories, as previously described [5]: 1) serum albumin, 2) BMI, 3) predialysis SCr/BSA, and 4) normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR). The threshold values used were serum albumin < 3.8 g/dL, BMI < 23 kg/m2, SCr/BSA < 659 mmol/L/m2, and nPCR < 0.8 g/kg/day. nPCR was used as an indirect indicator of protein intake and was calculated using a formula previously reported [7]. BSA was estimated using the Du Bois formula [8]. A threshold value of 659 mmol/L/m2 for the SCr/BSA variable was selected based on the results of a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis (Figure 1).
2.3. Study Outcome
Data for endpoints were obtained from hospital charts. The primary endpoint of the study was hospitalization. The following hospitalization data were collected: 1) date of hospitalization and discharge, 2) diagnosis, and 3) treatment. This study was a prospective study and the sample size was dependent on the number of HD patients eligible for enrollment in this study.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Nonparametric values were expressed as median values and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Categorical values were expressed as percentages and compared using Fisher’s exact test. In univariate logistic regression, we determined variables with a P-value of <0.10, in addition to sex, presence of diabetes, CRP, and Kt/V. Hospitalization was analyzed based on the Kaplan-Meier curve. A log-rank test was used to compare the hospitalization rates of two groups. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model with adjustment for multivariate factors was used to evaluate risk of hospitalization. Results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2 software program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for Windows personal computers. There were no missing data or loss to follow-up in this study.
3. Results
A total of 180 patients on stable HD maintained with a bicarbonate dialysate were enrolled in the study. The baseline characteristics of the participants classified using the PEW score are shown in Table 1. The study cohort consisted of 38 women and 142 men (mean age 61 years; mean dialysis vintage 10 years; mean BMI 21.8). The underlying kidney diseases were chronic glomerulonephritis (74 patients), diabetic kidney disease (62 patients), glomerulosclerosis (32 patients), and other (12 patients). None had any residual renal function (urine volume < 100 mL). Mean dialysis dose was 1.49 for a single-pool Kt/V, and mean protein intake was 1.12 g/kg/day. Of the 180 patients, 102 (56.7%) had moderate or severe wasting. Data for all participants were available for analysis during the follow-up period. There were no missing data in this study.
![]()
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the optimal cut-off value of serum creatinine adjusted for body surface area for detecting hospitalization rate. Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve.
![]()
Table 1. Baseline characteristics according to the protein-energy wasting score.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; Kt/V, blood-based dialysis parameter; nPCR, normalized protein catabolic rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; BSA, body surface area. *P < 0.001 versus score 0; **P < 0.05 versus score 0.
There were 168 hospitalizations during the 24-month follow-up period. The most common cause of hospitalization was pneumonia. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that the hospitalization rate was lower in the group with a PEW score of 0 (S0) than in the group with a high PEW score (S2-4; Figure 2). Table 2 shows predictors of hospitalization in the MHD patients. The HRs for hospitalization in the severe wasting group (S3/4) relative to the normal nutritional status group (S0), slight wasting group (S1) and moderate wasting group (S2) were 3.109, 2.774, and 2.048, respectively (Table 2).
![]()
Table 2. Predictive factors of hospitalization in patients on maintenance hemodialysis as determined by Cox proportional hazard models.
Abbreviations: PEW score, protein-energy wasting score; HR, hazards ratio; CI, confidence interval; Kt/V, blood-based dialysis parameter.
![]()
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meyer curve for hospitalization according to the protein-energy wasting score. S0 had a normal nutritional status, S1 had slight wasting, S2 had moderate wasting, and S3-4 had severe wasting.
4. Discussion
We evaluated the usefulness of a simple PEW score calculated from readily available clinical parameters and demonstrated its utility as a predictor of the risk of hospitalization in MHD patients. Although impaired nutritional status is frequently reported in MHD patients, there is no single nutritional parameter that can predict PEW. We hope to improve outcomes in MHD patients by using simple nutritional markers to evaluate their nutritional status.
Hypoalbuminemia is a strong predictor of mortality in MHD patients. Kalantar-Zadeh et al. showed that a serum albumin level of <3.8 g/dL in MHD patients was correlated with increased mortality from cardiovascular disease, independent of demographic, clinical and hematological data [9]. Also, Malfra et al. demonstrated that serum albumin level of <3.7 g/dL was a strong predictor of mortality in HD patients [10]. A 10-year cohort study reported increased risk of mortality in HD patients with a serum albumin level of ≤3.8 g/dl [11]. However, Friedman and Fadem [12] recently showed that the serum albumin level should be used cautiously as a nutritional marker in dialysis patients, because hypoalbuminemia could arise from both malnutrition and inflammation.
A lower prevalence of inflammation has been reported in HD patients in Asian countries, including Japan and Korea, and this lower prevalence may be associated with genetic factors and cultural habits, such as dietary factors [13] [14]. The prevalence of obesity in MHD patients appears to be paradoxically associated with a higher survival rate [15] [16]. Mortality in Asian-American HD patients is reported to be lower than that in Caucasian HD patients. In fact, Asian-Americans have a significantly lower BMI [17]. The ISRNM has proposed a BMI of ≤23 as a diagnostic criterion for PEW in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients [3] , but has not recommended its use in South Asian CKD patients [5].
nPCR reflects dietary protein intake [18] , and it was reported to be an independent predictor of mortality in MHD patients [19]. A study by Chandna et al. showed a substantial decrease in nPCR among CKD patients at 3 months before the start of dialysis [20]. The Kidney/Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines recommend a daily protein intake of 1.2 - 1.3 g/kg/day for MHD patients [21]. Lukowsky et al. reported that patients with nPCR decreased by ≥0.2 within 3 months before the start of dialysis have an increased risk of death [22].
No single parameter allows for comprehensive and conclusive assessment of nutritional status in HD patients. Therefore, collective evaluation of multiple nutritional markers is recommended by the K/DOQI guidelines [21]. A recent expert panel has suggested the use of markers from four different categories (blood biochemistry, BMI, muscle mass, and dietary intake) for the clinical diagnosis of PEW [3]. Three out of these four categories should be selected, including at least one biochemical factor, to satisfy this diagnosis. However, to our knowledge, these combinations have not yet been tested for the assessment of nutritional status in MHD patients.
Moreau-Gaudry et al. [4] reported a simple PEW scoring method that includes one parameter from each of the following major groups proposed for nutritional intervention: 1) biological parameters, 2) body composition, 3) muscle mass, and 4) nutrient intake. It seems important to add hematological data (e.g., serum albumin and serum creatinine) and other clinical information (e.g., BMI). Muscle mass represents an important body feature strongly associated with survival, but because assessment of muscle mass is difficult, predialysis SCr/BSA was used for the assessment. SCr/BSA values differ between Western and Asian subjects, and may vary depending on creatinine uptake and metabolism. This is why serum creatinine is not used routinely. In fact, SCr/BSA shows a better fit to the Cox model than serum albumin. Eventually, we decided to include protein intake, estimated by the nPCR, as information on nutrient intake in the score. This value is also listed in the recent international recommendations and can be easily calculated using dialysis generator software. The inclusion of SCr/BSA in our model improved the prediction of hospitalization compared with the use of albumin alone.
Our study has several limitations. First, because some participants had comorbid conditions, the way in which the study population was enrolled may have introduced selection bias and may have failed to gather a representative sample of the general Japanese population. Second, it should be noted that the score itself was not better than the four parameters included in the model as separate variables [4]. However, this result was not unexpected, because the information given by the score depends on the variables included in the score. We believe that this score is of interest because it would encourage dialysis staff to pay more attention to all of these variables. The PEW score can be calculated within minutes at the bedside and requires no additional preparation or expense. The final patient classification we obtained corresponds well to a publication on the prevalence of nutritional disorders in MHD patients, which reports that moderate and severe nutritional disorders are found in 37% and 19% of HD patients, respectively [23].
5. Conclusion
This simple-to-calculate nutritional score is useful for the identification of PEW in MHD patients in routine clinical practice. Further studies are needed to establish the PEW score in Asian populations because of differences in body composition and clinical practice.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the medical staff of Shinjuku Ishikawa Clinic who provided high-quality data.