Author(s)

Marie-France Daniel, Jean-Charles Pettier, Emmanuèle Auriac-Slusarczyk

.

Can philosophical dialogue foster the developmental process of certain language and discursive capabilities, such as decentering and abstraction, in four-year old children? And if so, to what extent? In this paper, the authors examine discursive and language competence in a group of four-year-old children during a four-month philosophical praxis (experimental group), compared to that of a group of five-year-old children that experienced no philosophical praxis (control group). The analysis was conducted using two instruments: 1) for discursive competence, the typology of exchanges put forward by Daniel et al. (underlying criteria include the presence/absence of a common problem to solve, centering/decentering of thinking, complexity of interventions and cognitive skills, etc.) and 2) for language competence, the language markers that emerged from the transcripts (“I”, “we”, “he – particular”, “they – general”, “you”.) These two instruments contributed to situating the children’s discourse within a process of increasing complexity related to decentering and abstraction. Results indicate that the children in the experimental group engaged in diversified exchanges (three types: anecdotal, monological, dialogical) with a predominance of the monological type and the use of language markers related to the general “they”, while the children in the control group engaged in anecdotal exchanges with a predominant use of “I”.

Discursive and Language Competence, Childhood, Argumentative Discourse, Philosophical Dialogue

Daniel, M. , Pettier, J. and Auriac-Slusarczyk, E. (2011) The Incidence of Philosophy on Discursive and Language Competence in Four-Year-Old Pupils. Creative Education, 2, 296-304. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.23041.