Journal of Service Science and Management

Volume 3, Issue 4 (December 2010)

ISSN Print: 1940-9893   ISSN Online: 1940-9907

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.94  Citations  

The Collusion Deterrence with Prisoner’s Dilemma

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 150KB)  PP. 470-478  
DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2010.34053    9,133 Downloads   14,173 Views  
Author(s)

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

I tried to present a new method to prevent collusion through employing two auditors at the same time and inspiring them provide true report by exploiting their prisoner’s dilemma. But I found this method cannot be put into practice because of the high cost. So I analyzed whether sending the second auditor in a probability, a low cost method, can deter the audit collusion. I find sending the second auditor in a probability, enforcing the rigidly lawful punishment and perfecting the reward mechanism can prevent audit collusion. I also find the auditor’s ethical constraint do good to prevent collusion and the charger of state assets management can play the same role as the real owner of the state-owned enterprise in deterring collusion. This finding provides theory support for the government to implement the publicly audit bidding and random double auditing system on state-owned enterprise. The supervision of PCAOB on auditors is also the operation of this theory.

Share and Cite:

Liu, A. and Liu, J. (2010) The Collusion Deterrence with Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3, 470-478. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2010.34053.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.