Share This Article:

Findings from European Benchmarking Exercises on E-Learning: Value and Impact

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:238KB) PP. 208-219
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2011.23029    4,237 Downloads   8,092 Views   Citations


Benchmarking is becoming a more and more commonly used method for quality assurance and enhancement in higher education today. The aim of this study was to explore the impact and value of benchmarking e-learning in universities. Two European benchmarking initiatives, E-xcellence+ through the European Association of Distance Teaching Universities [EADTU] and an e-learning benchmarking exercise through the European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities [ESMU], were studied using an exploratory multiple case study method and cross-case analysis of the findings. The findings indicated the value and impact of a variety of aspects of benchmarking e-learning on different levels, and stressed the need for a holistic and contextual approach as both benchmarking and e-learning are complex and comprehensive phenomena. This study also shows that benchmarking, in line with national and international quality boards/agencies, is a powerful tool for making improvements to teaching and learning in higher education.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Ossiannilsson, E. (2011) Findings from European Benchmarking Exercises on E-Learning: Value and Impact. Creative Education, 2, 208-219. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.23029.


[1] Bacsich, P. (2009a). Benchmarking e-Learning in United Kingdom universities—The methodologies. In T. Mayes, D. Morrison, H. Mellar, P. Bulen and M. Oliver (Eds.), Transforming higher education through technology enhanced learning (pp. 90-106). Bristol: The Higher Academy.
[2] Bacsich, P. (2009b). Benchmarking e-learning in United Kingdom universities: Lessons learned from and for the international context. Proceedings of the 23rd ICDE World Conference on Open Learning and Distances Education Including the 2009 EADTU Annual Conference. M-ICDE Conference Flexible Education for All: Open- Global-Innovative. Maastricht.
[3] Bates, T. (2009). Re: Using technology to improve the cost-effectivenes of the academy. [Web log message]. URL (last checked 10 June 2011)
[4] Bates, T. (2010). Re: Strategic thinking about e-learning. [Web log message]. URL (last checked 10 June 2011)
[5] Bonk, C. J. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.
[6] Comba, V., Ossiannilsson, E., Landgren, L., Blok, R., Martiens, F. J., Kjaer, C., & Christensen, I.-M. (2010). A benchmarking exercise for quality blended learning. A challenge for European universities in the twentyfirst century. Proceedings of EADTU Annual Conference, Zermatt, 55-75.
[7] Conole, G. (2010). Learning design: Making practice explicit. ConnectED Conference 28 June, 2010. Sydney. URL (last checked 10 June 2011)
[8] Creswell, J. W., & Clarke, P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[9] Ehlers, U.-D., & Pawlowski, J. (2006). Quality in European e-learning: An Introduction. In U.-D. Ehlers and J. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on quality and standardization in e-learning (pp. 1-3). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-32788-6_1
[10] Ehlers, U.-D., & Schneckenberg, D. (2010). Introduction: Changing cultures in higher education. In U.-D. Ehlers and D. Schneckenberg (Eds.), Changing cultures in higher education (pp. 1-14). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03582-1_1
[11] European Commission (2009). The Bologna process 2020—The European higher education area in the decade. URL (last checked 10 June 2011)
[12] Elliott, J. G., Stemler, S. E., Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Hoffman, N. (2011). The socially skilled teacher and the development of tacit knowledge. British Educational Research Journal, 1, 83-104. doi:10.1080/01411920903420016
[13] Giger, P. (2010). Conversation and figuration from the horizontality of the 2.0 decade. Ph.D. Thesis, Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
[14] H?m?l?inen, K., Jessen, A., Kaartinen-Koutaniemi, M., & Kristoffersen, D. (2003). Benchmarking in the improvements of higher education. Helsinki: ENQA [The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education].
[15] H?yrup, S. (2004). Reflection as a core process in organizational learning. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 8, 42-54.
[16] Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
[17] Johnson, M., & Seborg, D. (Eds.) (2007). Benchmarking concepts: An introduction. Process control performance assessment benchmarking concepts: An introduction. London: Springer.
[18] McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The three P’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Pesonalization, participation and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1, 10-27.
[19] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Los Angeles, California: Sage Publications Inc.
[20] Moriarty, J. P. (2008). A theory of benchmarking. Lincoln: Lincoln University.
[21] Moriarty, J. P., & Smallman, C. (2009). En route to a theory on benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 4, 484-503.
[22] NAHE [The Swedish National Agency for Higher Education] (2008). E-learning quality: Aspects and criteria. Solna: H?gskoleverket.
[23] Ossiannilsson, E. (2010). Benchmarking e-learning in higher education. Findings from EADTU’s E-xcellence+ project and ESMU’s benchmarking exercise in e-learning. In M. Soinila, & M. Stalter (Eds.), Quality assurance of e-learning (pp. 32-44). Helsinki: ENQA [The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education].
[24] Ossiannilsson, E. (in press). Benchmarking on e-learning in universities: Impacts and values, European perspectives. International Journal of Management in Education. Special Issue on Virtual University.
[25] Ossiannilsson, E. (2011). European experiences on the e-xcellence benchmarking initiative by EADTU. In W. Aung (Ed.), iNEER Special Volume: Innovations 2011—World innovations in engineering education and research. Manuscript accepted for publication.
[26] Ossiannilsson, E., & Landgren, L. (in press). Quality in e-learning—A conceptual framework based on experiences from three international benchmarking projects at Lund Univesity, Sweden. Journal of Computer Assisted Learnin, Special Issue on Quality in e-learning.
[27] O’Reilly, T., & Batelle, J. (2009). Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. Special Report. URL (last checked 10 June 2011)
[28] Re.ViCa. (2009). Bibliography of benchmarking. URL (last checked 10 June 2011)
[29] Sangra, A. (2008). Technologies in university: Models, problems and challenges. Ph.D. Thesis, Tarragona: Universitas Rovira i Virgili.
[30] Soinila, M., & Stalter, M. (Eds.) (2010). Quality assurance of e-learning. Helsinki: ENQA [The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education].
[31] Schreurs, B. (Ed.) (2009). Critical success factors. Reviewing the virtual campus phenomenon. The rise of large-scale e-Learning initiatives worldwide (pp. 59-84). Leuven: EuroPACE ivzw
[32] Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 1, URL (last checked 10 June 2011)
[33] Ubachs, G. (2009). E-xcellence quality assessment for e-learning. Heerlen: EADTU [European Association of Distance Teaching Universities].
[34] Van Vught, F., Brandenburg, U., & Burquel, N. (Eds.) (2008a). Benchmarking in European higher education. Findings of a two year EU-funded project. Brussels: ESMU [European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities].
[35] Van Vught, F., Brandenburg, U., & Burquel, N. (Eds.) (2008b). A practical guide. Benchmarking in European higher education. Brussels: ESMU [European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities].
[36] Williams, K., & Brown, T. (2009). E-xcellence site visit report, Lund University. Heerlen: EADTU [European Association of Distance Teaching Universities].
[37] Williams, K., & Rotheram, B. (2010). Report. Benchmarking Exercise on E-learning. Brussels: ESMU [European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities].
[38] Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Los Angeles, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
[39] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.