Efficacy of Priming: Evidence from Expert Performance

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.517195   PDF   HTML   XML   2,368 Downloads   3,002 Views  


The vast majority of studies performed on the priming of attitudes, dispositions, and behavior engaged non-selective group of students as participants. This study engaged highly skilled experts as well as student cohorts. In a series of 3 experiments, professional chess players as well as non-selected groups of students were primed for risk-taking behavior. The priming manipulations included words (Experiments 1-2) and pictures (Experiment 3). The results showed that priming was roughly effective to the same extent with experts and non-experts. We conclude that experts are not immune of the influence of priming—their high motivation and domain-specific performance notwithstanding.

Share and Cite:

Bitensky, I. , Mama, Y. & Algom, D. (2014). Efficacy of Priming: Evidence from Expert Performance. Psychology, 5, 1923-1932. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.517195.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Priming on Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244
[2] Bargh, J. A., & Shalev, I. (2011). The Substitutability of Physical and Social Warmth in Daily Life. Emotion, 12, 154-162.
[3] Bilalic, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2010). Inflexibility of Experts—Reality or Myth? Quantifying the Einstellung Effect in Chess Masters. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 73-102.
[4] Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in Chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
[5] Chassy, P. & Gobet, F. (2011). A Hypothesis about the Biological Basis of Expert Intuition. Review of General Psychology, 15, 198-212.
[6] de Groot, A. (1946). Het denken van den Schaker. Amsterdam: Noord Hollandsche
[7] de Groot, A. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess (2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
[8] de Groot, A. & Gobet, F. (1996). Perception and Memory in Chess. Heuristics of the Professional Eye. Assen: Van Gorcum.
[9] Elo, A. (1978). The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present. New York: Arco.
[10] Erb, H. P., Bioy, A., & Hilton, D. J. (2002). Choice Preferences without Inferences: Subconscious Priming of Risk Attitudes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 250-258.
[11] Forster, J., & Liberman, N. (2007). Knowledge Activation. In A. Kruglanski, & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed., pp. 201-231). New York: Guilford Press.
[12] Freud, S. (1901). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life: Forgetting, Slips of the Tongue, Bungled Actions, Superstitions and Errors. London: Ernest Benn Limited.
[13] Freud, S. (1920). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. New York: Horace Liveright.
[14] Gerdes, C., & Gransmark, P. (2010). Strategic Behavior across Gender: A Comparison of Female and Male Expert Chess Players. Labour Economics, 17, 766-775.
[15] Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). The Roles of Recognition Processes and Look ahead Search in Time-Constrained Expert Problem Solving: Evidence from Grandmaster Level Chess. Psychological Science, 7, 52-55.
[16] Gobet, F., de Voogt, A., & Retschitzki, J. (2004). Moves in Mind: The Psychology of Board Games. Hove: Psychology Press.
[17] Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2007). The Role of Domain-Specific Practice, Handedness and Starting Age in Chess. Developmental Psychology, 43, 159-172.
[18] Hassin, R. R., Ferguson, M. J., Shidlovsky, D., & Gross, T. (2007). Subliminal Exposure to National Flags Affects Political Thought and Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19757-19761.
[19] Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., & Zimerman, S. (2009). Automatic and Flexible: The Case of Nonconscious Goal Pursuit. Social Cognition, 27, 20-36.
[20] Kay, A. C., Wheeler, S. C., Bargh, J. A., & Ross, L. (2004). Material Priming: The Influence of Mundane Physical Objects on Situational Construal and Competitive Behavioral Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83-96.
[21] Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2009) Playing Chess Unconsciously. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 292-298.
[22] Mussweiler, T., & Forster, J. (2000). The Sex-Aggression Link: A Perception-Behavior Dissociation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 507-520.
[23] Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual Span in Expert Chess Players: Evidence from Eye Movements. Psychological Science, 12, 49-56.
[24] Saariluoma, P. (1991). Aspects of Skilled Imagery in Blindfold Chess. Acta Psychologica, 77, 65-89.
[25] Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in Experts: The Role of Task Characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 252-266.
[26] Shantz, A., & Latham, G. P. (2009). An Exploratory Field Experiment of the Effect of Subconscious and Conscious Goals on Employee Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 9-17.
[27] Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing. II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending and a General Theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
[28] Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in Chess. American Scientist, 61, 394-403.
[29] Weiss, D. J., & Shanteau, J. (2003). Empirical Assessment of Expertise. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45, 104-116.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.