Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.3 No.1(2013), Article ID:27365,4 pages DOI:10.4236/apm.2013.31013
The Brunn-Minkowski Inequalities for Centroid Body
School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
Email: yuanjun_math@126.com
Received August 9, 2012; revised September 22, 2012; accepted October 6, 2012
Keywords: Centroid Body; The Brunn-Minkowski Inequality
ABSTRACT
In [1], the authors established the Brunn-Minkowski inequality for centroid body. In this paper, we give an isolate form and volume difference of it, respectively. Both of these results are strength versions of the original.
1. Introduction
The setting for this paper is n-dimensional Euclidean space. Let
denote the set of convex bodies (compact, convex subsets with non-empty interiors). Let
and
denote the unit ball and unit sphere in
, respectively. If
, then the support function of K,
, is defined by
(1.1)
where denotes the standard inner product of u and x.
For each compact star-shaped about the origin, denoted by
its n-dimensional volume. The centroid body
of K is the origin-symmetric convex body whose support function is given by (see [2])
(1.2)
where the integration is with respect to Lebesgue measure on.
Centroid body was attributed by Blaschke and Dupin (see [3,4]), it was defined and investigated by Petty [2]. More results regarding centroid body see [2-7].
For star body K and L, let denote the harmonic Blaschke addition of K and L. In [1], the authors established the following Brunn-Minkowski inequality for centroid body.
Theorem A. Let be star bodies in
. Then
(1.3)
the equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic.
In this paper, we give two strength versions of (1.3). Our main results are the following two theorems.
Theorem 1.1. Let be star bodies in
and
.
the equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic.
Theorem 1.2. Let and
be star bodies in
. Ellipsoid
, and
is a homothetic copy of
. Then
the equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic and
where
is a constant.
Remark. Let or
in Theorem 1.1, or let
in Theorem 1.2, we can both get the Theorem A.
2. Notation and Preliminary Works
For a compact subset of
, with the origin in its interior, star-shaped with respect to the origin, the radial function
, is defined by
(2.1)
If is continuous and positive, L will be called a star body. Let
denote the set of star bodies in
.
The mixed volume of the compact convex subsets
of
is defined by
If,
, then
will be denote as
. If
, then
is called the quermassintegrals of
; it will often be written as
.
The mixed quermassintegrals
of
, are defined by [8]
(2.2)
Since, it follows that
, for all i. Since the quermassintegrals
is Minkowski linear, it follows that
for all K.
Aleksandrov [9] and Fenchel and Jessen [10] have shown that for and
, there exists a regular Borel measure
on
, such that the mixed quermassintegrals
has the following integral representation:
(2.3)
for all. The measure
is independent of the body
and is just ordinary Lebesgue measure, S on
. The surface area measure
will frequently be written simply as
.
Suppose,
and
are nonnegative real numbers and not both zero. To define the harmonic Blaschke addition,
, first define
by [6]
(2.4)
The body is defined as the body whose radial function is given by
(2.5)
3. Inequalities for Centroid Body
In this section, we will establish the inequality more general than Theorem 1.1 as follows.
Theorem 3.1. Let,
and
. Then
with equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic.
To prove Theorem 3.1, the following preliminary results will be needed:
Lemma 3.2. ([8]). Let and
. Then
(3.1)
with equality if and only if K and L are homothetic.
Lemma 3.3. ([11]). Let,
. Then
(3.2)
with equality if and only if K and L are homothetic.
Proof of Theorem 3.1.
By (2.4), (2.5) and the polar coordinate formula for volume, we can get Hence from (2.5), we obtain
(3.3)
Using polar coordinates, (1.2) can be written as an integral over
(3.4)
Then from (3.3) and (3.4), we have
(3.5)
For and
. Let
By (2.3) and (3.5), we have
That is
(3.6)
By Lemma 3.2, we get
which implies that,
(3.7)
with equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic.
The Brunn-Minkowski inequality (3.2) can now be used to conclude that
(3.8)
with equality holds if and only if F and G are homothetic.
By (3.7) and (3.8), we get the first inequality of Theorem 3.1. By the equality conditions of (3.7) and (3.8), the first equality of Theorem 3.1 holds if and only if and
are homothetic.
By (3.5) and Lemma 3.3, we get
Similarly,
Hence,
with equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic. This completes the proof.
Let in Theorem 3.1, we obtain an isolate form of Brunn-Minkowski inequality for centroid body.
Corollary 3.4. Let be star bodies in
and
.
the equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic.
Now, we establish the volume difference of BrunnMinkowski inequality for centroid body.
Theorem 3.5. Let and
be star bodies in
. Ellipsoid
, and
is a homothetic copy of
. Then
the equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic and
where
is a constant.
To prove Theorem 3.5, we need the following two lemmas:
Lemma 3.6. (Bellman’s inequality) ([12], p. 38). Suppose that and
are two n-tuples of positive real numbers, and
such that
Then
with equality if and only if, where
is a constant.
Lemma 3.7. (Busemann-Petty centroid inequality) ([4], p. 359). Let. Then
with equality if and only if is a centered ellipsoid.
Proof of Theorem 1.2. Applying inequality (1.3), we have
(3.9)
the equality holds if and only if and
are homothetic.
(3.10)
From (3.9) and (3.10), we obtain that
(3.11)
Since and
by Lemma 3.7, we get
and
By (3.11) and Bellman’s inequality, we get
(3.12)
By the equality conditions of (3.9) and the Bellman’s inequality, the equality of (3.12) holds if and only if and
are homothetic and
where
is a constant. This completes the proof.
4. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11101216, 11161024), Qing Lan Project and the Nanjing Xiaozhuang University (2009XZRC05, 2010KYQN24).
REFERENCES
- J. Yuan, L. Z. Zhao and G. S. Leng, “Inequalities for Lp Centroid Body,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1315-1325.
- C. M. Petty, “Centroid Surface,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1961, pp. 1535-1547. doi:10.2140/pjm.1961.11.1535
- K. Leichtwei, “Affine Geometry of Convex Bodies,” J. A. Barth, Heidelberg, 1998.
- R. Schneider, “Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526282
- R. J. Gardner, “Geometric Tomography,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
- E. Lutwak, “Centroid Bodies and Dual Mixed Volumes,” Proceedings London Mathematical Society, Vol. 60, No. 2, 1990, pp. 365-391. doi:10.1112/plms/s3-60.2.365
- G. Y. Zhang, “Centered Bodies and Dual Mixed Volumes,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 345, No. 2, 1994, pp. 777-801. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1994-1254193-9
- E. Lutwak, “The Brunn-Minkowski-Firey Theory I: Mixed Volumes and the Minkowski Problem,” Journal of Differential Geometry, Vol. 38, 1993, pp. 131-150.
- A. D. Aleksandrov, “Zur Theorie der Gemischten Volumina von Konvexen Körpern, I. Verallgemeinerung einiger Begriffe der Theorie der Konvexen Körpern,” Matematicheskii Sbornik, Vol. 2, 1937, pp. 947-972.
- W. Fenchel and B. Jessen, “Mengenfunktionen und Konvexe Körpern,” Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Matematisk-Fysiske Meddelelser, Vol. 16, 1938, p. 3.
- R. J. Gardner, “The Brunn-Minkowski Inequality,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2002, pp. 355-405. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00941-2
- E. F. Beckenbach and R. Bellman, “Inequalities,” Springer, Berlin, 1961. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-64971-4