Radon exhalation from phosphogypsum stabilized in sulfur polymer cement

Abstract

Phosphogypsum (PG), primary by-product from phosphoric acid production, is accumulated in large stock-piles which were active until 2010, when spills were banned. It is considered as NORM material that contains radionuclides from 238U and decay series which are of most radiotoxicity. PG was valorized and/or recycled in a building material, sulfur polymer cement (SPC). The SPC-PG samples reach the international regulation to use in the manufacture of building materials without radiological restrictions, except the sample with the 50% of PG. Under normal conditions of ventilation the contribution to the expected radon indoor concentration is also below the international recommendation.

Share and Cite:

García-Diaz, I. , Alguacil, F. , Gázquez, M. , Bolivar, J. , Coto, I. and López, F. (2013) Radon exhalation from phosphogypsum stabilized in sulfur polymer cement. Natural Science, 5, 646-652. doi: 10.4236/ns.2013.55080.

1. INTRODUCTION

The phosphate rock, due to its origin, is affected by high concentration of impurities, heavy metals, naturally occurring radionuclides and other so-called trace elements. A common mineral in phosphate rock is the carbonate fluorapatite, in which up to the 0.02% U can substitute for positions typically occupied by atoms of calcium in the structure [1]. The phosphate rock is treated with sulfuric acid to produce phosphoric acid by the dihydrate process according to Eq.1 [2,3]. During this process is also produced a by-product called phosphorgypsum (PG).

(1)

The composition of PG is dominated by gypsum, impurities including Al, P, F, Si, Fe, Mg as well naturallyoccurring radionuclides which originate mainly from the phosphate rock used in the processing. Concentration of these hazardous elements, may vary mainly depending on the origin of the phosphate rock and to a lesser extent, on factor such as plant generation and PG age [4].

Most sedimentary phosphate rock deposits contain elevated levels of radionuclides from 238U in secular equilibrium with its daughters [5]. Chemical processing of the phosphate rock in order to produce phosphoric acid, results in a fractionation into the acids and PG of radioelement contained in phosphate rock [6]. The phosphogypsum contains specific activities of 226Ra, the decay chain segment in the uranium series, between one and two orders of magnitude higher than the natural gypsum depending on the uranium content of the rock [7].

The radium 226 has a half life of 1620 years and is the long-term source radioactivity in most PG. One of the major concerns of materials which contain enhanced levels of 226Ra is the production of 222Rn gas. 222Rn and its short-lived decay products are the most important contributor to human exposure to ionizing radiation which can causes health damages.

Due to the radionucleides concentration the by-products, PG, is considered as NORM material (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials) [8,9].

Large quantities of PG are produced, the world production was 200 - 280 × 106 t per year [10]. Several phosphate processing plants are located on the south-western coast of Spain (on the outskirts of the town of Huelva) close to the estuary of the Odiel and Tinto rivers, where phosphoric acid has been produced since 1968. The company imports sedimentary phosphate rocks from Morocco, which mainly contain around 100 - 150 ppm of U [3]. Until 2010 the PG production at Huelva was around 3 ×

106 t per year [11]. This by-product was accumulated in regulated stock-piles and occupied vast areas of land, located in the town’s surroundings with the consequent environmental problem.

Therefore the waste and the by-products are gaining more and more attention nowadays, such research and/or production is being carried out to the incorporation of these wastes and by-products (fly ash, red mud, coal slag, ceramic waste) as building material [12-15].

The sulfur polymer cement, SPC, has been used in civil engineering (column supports, pump foundations, walls in storage areas, etc.) due to its excellent properties, which for certain applications are superior to ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The SPC presents high durability and fast setting time and rapid gain of high strength, achieving most of its mechanical strength in less than 1 day of curing. It has also recently emerged as a possible alternative as a binding and stabilizing agent for the solidification and stabilization of hazardous, low-level radioactive and mixed wastes [16].

Due to the relatively high levels of natural radionucleides in the PG an important radiation exposure could be received from building materials containing this byproduct. This implies the need to control it.

Different international recommendations propose reference values of the natural radionuclide concentrations in building materials (Publication No. 112 from monographic collection “Radiation Protection” issued by the European Union) [17]. The activity concentration index (I), is calculated on the bases of the activity concentrations of radium (226Ra) in the uranium (238U) decay series, radium (238Ra) in the thorium (232Th) decay series and potassium (40K), Eq.2. I index ensures that external gamma dose rate inside de room from building materials does not exceeded 1 mSv per year, Table 1. When the gamma dose are limited to levels below 1 mSV per year, the 226Ra concentration in the materials are limited, to levels which are unlike to cause indoor radon concentration exceeding the design level of 200 Bq∙m−3.

(2)

where C(226Ra), C(228Ra), C(40K) are the activity concentrations for 226Ra, 228Ra and 40K, respectively in the building material considered, expressed in Bq·Kg1.

Other countries considered to the radiological control of building material the equivalent radium concentration parameter, Ra(eq), which is shown in Eq.3:

(3)

The reference value for Ra (eq) in many countries for building materials is 370 Bq·kg1 [18]. The radon-222 and its short-lived daughters contributions are on 50% of the total natural effective dose received by the population [19]. As a consequence, many countries have established reference levels for radon in houses and work places, being these values of 200 and 400 Bq·m1, respectively.

So the main objective of this research was to evaluate the radiological impact of phosphogypsum stabilized in sulfur polymer cement.

2. EXPERIMENTAL

Various SPC samples were studied. These were obtained by a mix of different proportions of phosphogypsum, sulfur, gravel, sand and a thermoplastic material used as modified sulfur containing polymer [20], Table 2. The SPC samples were manufactured according to López et al. [21].

The ratio of gravel/sand and sulfur/modified sulfur (STXTM) was maintained constant at 0.5 and 10 respectively. These relations are the best condition for the viscosity and workability of the mixture [21,22].

Phosphogypsum has been added to the mixtures at dosages between 10 and 50 wt%.

Each sample was called as SPC X-Y where “X” is the percentage wt% of elemental sulfur and “Y” is the percentage wt% of phosphogypsum of the mixtures.

The SPC sample reference, SPC 21 - 0, was manufactured as to the PG-SPC samples, but in this case, calcium carbonate (99.5% purity, Panreac) was added as filler in substitution of PG.

2.1. Measurement of Radionuclides

A gamma spectrometry system with an XtRa coaxial germanium detector (Canberra), which has a 38% relative

Table 1. Dose criteria recommendation to activity concentration index (I).

Table 2. Composition of SPC samples (wt%) and sulfur/PG ratio.

efficiency, and FWHM of 0.95 keV at the 122 keV line of 57Co and 1.9 keV at the 1333 keV line of 60Co were used to the radioactive characterization. The detector was coupled to a conventional electronic chain, including a multichannel analyser and was shielded with Fe 15 cm thick. The samples were dried at 60˚C and grounded. The whole procedure of calibration and this gamma spectrometry system are described elsewhere [18].

2.2. Radon Potential and Bulk Exhalation Measurements

The radon exhalation is the radon flow released through the available surfaces (Bq·m2·h1), influenced by the material geometry and the boundary conditions. On the other hand, the radon potential is defined as the radon concentration generated inside the material and that is available to be transported through its pores.

The method to measure the radon potential and the emanation factors is described by López-Coto et al. [19]. From growth curves of radon inside a closed chamber it is possible to calculate the exhalation rate of the block and, under specific experimental conditions, the radon potential of the tested material. In addition, once crushed a portion of the specimen (about one third), from a second measurement in the chamber for obtaining radon potential and the real emanation factor of the material.

2.3. Radon Transport Simulations

The equation of radon conservation in the building material has allowed us to develop a 3D model of diffusive transport in porous media. This model has been solved for two geometries; a block of 0.04 × 0.04 × 0.16 m3 and a plate of 1 × 1 × 0.04 m3, which was carried out by using a numerical algorithm based on finite elements on an unstructured tetrahedral mesh.

Knowing the exhalation rate of the building materials used to construct a specific room, it is possible by modeling to estimate the expected radon concentration in this room under certain ventilation conditions [23]. In this sense, it has been applied a simple model of radon accumulation in a standard room of 5 × 5 × 2 m3 coated on all sides by plates of the same material.

3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Activity Concentration and Index Risk

Table 3 shows the radionuclide concentration of PG and SPC samples. Prior to possible use of PG-SPC as building materials, a preliminary radiological analysis have been carried out in order to reliably assess the radiation dose. Attending to these results it will be possible to decide whether these materials can be used, from a radiological point of view.

The activity concentrations of 238U and 226Ra in the pure PG sample are around 100 and 600 Bq·kg1 respectively, these values are in agreement with typical values given in the literature for PGs from Huelva [24], which are significantly higher than the average world-wide values from soils (25 Bq·kg1 of 238U and daughters) [25].

The radionuclides with the highest activity concentration in the SPC samples are 226Ra (and its daughters of small half live: 222Rn 218Pb, 218Bi, 214Pb, 214Bi, etc.), and 40K.

Linear decrease in activity concentration of 40K at increases the PG content in the sample it is observed, Figure 1. It is due to the very low content of potassium in PG (<18 Bq·kg1 of 40K, i.e., <0.06% of natural potassium). The concentration of 40K in all SPC-PG samples remains below the world average of 40K from soil, 400-500 Bq·kg1, only SPC 17 - 10 slightly exceeds this value.

Figure 1 shows a strong lineal dependence (r2 =

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Landa, E.R. (2007) Naturally occurring radionuclides from industrial sources: Characteristic and fate in the environment. Radioactivity in the Environment, 10, 121-237.
[2] Fertiberia (2002) Documentation on the industrial process at the Huelva phosphoric acid production plant. Fertiberia, S.A. (in Spanish).
[3] Bolivar, J.P., Martín, J.E., García-Tenorio, R., Pérez-Moreno, J.P. and Mas J.L. (2009) Behaviour and fluxes of natural raionuclides in the production process of a phosphoric acid plant. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 67, 345-356. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.10.012
[4] Renteria-Villalobos, M., Vioque, I., Mantero, J. and Majón, G. (2010) Radiological, chemical and morphological characterization of phosphate rock and phosphogypsum from phosphoric acid factories in SW Spain. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182, 193-203. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.116
[5] Lardinoye, M.H, Weterings, K. and Van der Bergn, W.B. (1982) Unexpected Ra-226 build up in wet phosphoricacids plants. Health Physics, 42, 503-514. doi:10.1097/00004032-198204000-00011
[6] Rutherford, P.M., Dudas, M.J. and Arocena, J.M. (1996) Heterogeneous distribution of radionuclides, barium and strontium in phosphogypsum by-products. The Science of the Total Environment, 180, 201-209. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(95)04939-8
[7] Papastefanou, C., Stoulos, S. and Monolopoulu, M. (2005) The radioactivity of building materials. Journal of Radionalytical and Nuclear Chesmistry, 266, 367-372. doi:10.1007/s10967-005-0918-z
[8] El Afifi, E.M., Hilal, M.A., Khalifa, S.M. and Aly, H.F. (2006) Evaluation of U, Th, K and emanated radon in some NORM and TENORM samples. Radiation Measurements, 41, 627-633. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.09.014
[9] El-Didamony, H., Gado, H.S., Awwad, N.S., Fawzy, M.M. and Attallah, M.F. (2013) Treatment of phosphogypsum waste produced from phosphate ore processing. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 244-245, 596-602. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.053
[10] Tayibi, H., Choura, M., López, F.A., Alguacil, F.J. and López-Delgado, A. (2009) Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum. Journal Environmental Management, 90, 2377-2386. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007
[11] Somlai, J., Jobbágy, V., Kovács, J., Tarján, S. and Kovács, T. (2008) Radiological aspects of the usability of red mud as building material additive. Journal of hazardous Materials, 150, 541-545. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.004
[12] Puertas, F., García-Díaz, I., Barba, A., Gazulla, M.F., Palacios, M., Gómez, M.P. and Martínez-Ramírez, S. (2008) Ceramic wastes as alternative raw materials for Portland cement clinker production. Cement and Concrete Composite, 30, 798-805. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.06.003
[13] Klover, K. (2009) Radiological constrains of using building materials and industrial by-products in construction. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 246-253. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.12.010
[14] Szabó, Zs., Volgyesi, P., Nagy, H.E., Szabó, Cs., Kis, Z. and Csorba, O. (2013) Radioactivity of natural and artificial building materials—A comparative study. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 118, 6474. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.11.008
[15] Deng-Liang, H. Guang-Fu, Y., Fa-Quin, D., Lai-Bao, L. and Ya-Jun, L. (2010) Research on the additives to reduce radioactive pollutants in the building materials containing fly ash. Journal Hazardous Materials, 177, 573-581. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.071
[16] Sheng-Lung, L., Lai, S.J. and Chian, E.S.K. (1995) Modifications of sulfur polymer cement (SPC) stabilization and solidifications (S/S) process. Waste management, 15, 441-447.
[17] EC (1999) Office European Commission Report on Radiological Protection Principles concerning the natural radioactive of building materials, Radiation Protection 112, Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
[18] Perez Moreno, P., San Miguel, E.G., Bolivar, J.P. and Aguado, J.L. (2002) A comprehensive calibration method of Ge detector for low level spectrometry measurement. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physic Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 491, 152-162. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01165-8
[19] López-Coto, I., Mas, J.L., Bolivar, J.P. and García-Tenorio, R. (2009) A short time method to measure the radon potential of porous materials. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 67, 133-138. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.07.015
[20] STARTcreteTM Technologies INC (2000) Labortory Procedure for Producing STARcretesTM Test Specimens. Technical Report.
[21] López, F.A., Gázquez, M., Alguacil, F.J., Bolívar J.P., García-Díaz, I. and López Coto, I. (2011) Microencapsulation of phosphogypsum into a sulfur polymer matrix: Physico-chemical and radiological characterization. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192, 234-245.
[22] Sandrolini, F., Manzi S. and Andrucci A. (2006) Sulfurpolymer matrix composites from particulate waste: A sustainable route to advanced materials. Composite Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 37, 695-702. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.004
[23] Lembrechts, J., Janssen, M. and Stoop, P. (2001) Ventilation and radon transport in Dutch dwellings computer modeling and field measurement. Science of the Total Environment, 272, 73-78. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00667-2
[24] Perez-López, R., Nieto, J.M., López-Coto, I., Aguado, J.L., Bolivar, J.P. and Santisteban, M. (2010) Dynamics of contaminants of phosphogypsum or the fertilizer industry of Huelva (SW Spain): From phosphate rock ore to the environment. Applied Geochemistry, 25, 705-715. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.02.003
[25] UNSCEAR (1993) sources and effects of ionizing radiation-United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, New York.
[26] López Coto, I., Mas, J.L., San Migel, E.G., Bolivar, J.P. and Sengugta D. (2009) A comparison between active and passive techniques for measurements of radon emanation factors. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 67, 849-853. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.01.045
[27] Magded, A.F. and Ashraf, F.A. (2005) Radon exhalation rate of some building materials used in Egypt. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 27, 485-489. doi:10.1007/s10653-005-5332-5
[28] Ackers, J.G., Den Boer, J.F., De Jong, P. and Wolschrijn, R.A. (1985) Radioactivity and radon exhalation rates of building materials in The Netherlands. Science of the Total Environment, 45(C), 151-156. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(85)90215-3
[29] Pereira, C.E., Vaidyan, V.K., Jojo, P.J. and Ramachandran, T.V. (2008) Measurement of radon exhalation rate from building materials used in the southwest coastal region of India. Indoor and Built Environment, 17, 472-475. doi:10.1177/1420326X08095830

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.