TITLE:
In vivo evaluation of an experimental root-end filling material versus MTA
AUTHORS:
Paul D. Eleazer, S. Craig Rhodes, David M. Horn, Patricia DeVilliers, Shi Wei, Lea Novak, Erik D. Dohm, Richard A. Weems, Mark S. Litaker
KEYWORDS:
MTA; Dog; Pulp; Root
JOURNAL NAME:
Open Journal of Animal Sciences,
Vol.3 No.3A,
July
17,
2013
ABSTRACT: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) has been found to be very biocompatible in a large number of studies. However, the handling properties can be challenging and research on modified materials to enhance placement are few. The purpose of this study is to compare a new faster setting, and more easily placed preparation with classic MTA in an animal model. Canine premolar teeth from two dogs were randomized and received quadrant surgery timed to allow 50 day and 98 day comparisons. Histologic and radiographic comparisons were made. Results were essentially equal in healing, even close to the materials.