Hempel, C. (1965). Inductive inconsistencies. In C. Hempel (Ed.), Aspects of scientific explanation (pp. 53-79). New York: The Free Press.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Value of Beauty in Theory Pursuit: Kuhn, Duhem, and Decision Theory

  AUTHORS: Gregory J. Morgan

  KEYWORDS: Beauty; Aesthetics in Science; Decision Theory; Pierre Duhem; Thomas Kuhn; Logic of Pursuit; Aesthetic Value; Freedom of Inquiry

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Philosophy, Vol.3 No.1, February 7, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Should judgments of beauty play a guiding role in theoretical science even if beauty is not a sign of truth? In this paper I argue that they should in certain cases. If we analyze the rationality of theoretical pursuit using decision theory, a theory’s beauty can influence the utilities of the various options confronting the researcher. After considering the views of Pierre Duhem and Thomas Kuhn on aesthetics in science, I suggest that because we value freedom of inquiry we rightly allow scientists some choice in how they value aesthetic properties of theories and thus some freedom to use beauty to guide their research program.