Liu, C. Y. (2016). On the Relationship between Public Opinion Supervision, Media Trials and the Independence of Criminal Justice. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), No. 5, 24-29.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Reflection and Improvement on the System for Initiating Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation in China

  AUTHORS: Kaiyin Zhu, Hexiao Yin

  KEYWORDS: Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation, Criminal Responsibility

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.12 No.11, November 7, 2024

  ABSTRACT: The initiation of forensic psychiatric evaluations concerns which criminal justice entity decides, and based on what standards, to conduct a psychiatric assessment of a criminal suspect or defendant. In practice, the initiation of forensic psychiatric evaluation in China is primarily based on “judicial officer-initiated system”. By reviewing relevant laws and regulations and summarizing typical cases, this paper identifies defects in China’s forensic psychiatric evaluation system as confusion over the initiating authority, unclear initiation standards, ambiguous reasons for non-initiation, monopolization of initiation power and incomplete remedies for non-initiation. These defects fundamentally stem from the inherent conflict between the party and law-enforcement agencies, as well as the reality of “replacing trial with evaluation”. To address these issues, this paper proposes granting the defendants more rights, clarifying initiation standards, and reconstructing the system for adopting forensic psychiatric evaluation opinions, aiming to improve the practice of forensic psychiatric evaluations and protect the rights of the parties involved.