Borgers, N., Sikkel, D., & Hox, J. (2004). Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point. Quality and Quantity, 38, 17-33.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013236.29205.a6

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Validation and Validity: Self-Efficacy, Metacognition, and Knowledge-and-Appraisal Personality Architecture (KAPA)

  AUTHORS: Laura Ritchie, Benjamin T. Sharpe

  KEYWORDS: Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, Personality, Validation, KAPA, Personality Measurement, Questionnaire Development

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.13 No.10, September 30, 2022

  ABSTRACT: This research examines and reframes the long-standing pursuit of validation in personality research, in response to a shift in the field to focus on inter-individual idiographic contexts and constructs by focusing on Know- ledge-and-Appraisals Personality Architecture (KAPA) as a method for person-centred, non-trait-based personality research. Aspects of instrument validity and validation are addressed, exploring relationships of cognition with self-variables to support the unique and informative nature of KAPA model for measuring personality architecture. First the validity of two empirical questionnaires, Self-efficacy for Performing (SEP) and the Metacognitive Thinking Questionnaire (MTQ) are demonstrated through EFA and CFA. Then the KAPA model for personality architecture, a person-based method that sits outside the traditional questionnaire approach to measuring personality, is validated by using elements of traditional validation and through exploring theoretically expected ontological relationships.