U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration Process (1994). Safety Management Guidelines for Compliance. U.S. Government Printing Office. OSHA 3133.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: A Performance Appraisal Tool for Risk Assessment and Accident Investigation in Complex and Dynamic Socio-Technical Systems

  AUTHORS: Issa Diop, Georges Abdul-Nour, Dragan Komljenovic

  KEYWORDS: Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM), Resilience Engineering (RE), Decision-Making, Strategic Asset Management (SAM), Risk Management (RM), Industry 4.0, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

  JOURNAL NAME: American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol.12 No.2, February 28, 2022

  ABSTRACT: This article aims at systematically reviewing the entire collection of papers published on the development and application of the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in the last decade. The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology has been utilized as a formal systematic literature review standard for data gathering. The analysis encompassed 47 documents devoted to this subject matter, systematically retrieved from the online database Scopus. The findings revealed the necessity for the development of systemic safety assessment approaches to explain performance variability of complex and dynamic socio-technical systems (risk assessment or accident investigation). Indeed, it is crucial to rigorously assess the performance variability throughout safety appraisal since unexpected performance variability can combine in undesirable manners and consequently denotes a threat for safety and losses of human life. However, the FRAM process has some pros and cons as discussed in this review. Consequently, other assessment methods exist to complement the FRAM process.