Bohm, D. (1952) A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables” I, Physical Review, 85, 66-179; (1952) A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables” II, Physical Review, 85, 80-193; Bohm,D., Aharonov, Y. (1957) Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky, Physical Review, 108, 1070-1076; Aharonov, Y. and Bohm D., (1959) Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Physical Review, 115, 485-491; Bohm, D. and Aharonov, Y. (1960) Further discussion of possible experimental tests for the paradox of einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, N.C. 17, 964; Aharonov, Y. and Bohm D. (1962) Remarks on the possibility of quantum electrodynamics without potentials, Physical Review, 125, 192;Aharonov, Y. and Bohm D. (1963) Further discussion of the role of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Physical Review, 130, 1625.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: A retrospective view on the history of natural sciences in XX-XXI

  AUTHORS: Vladislav Sergeyevich Olkhovsky

  KEYWORDS: science history; science realism; paradigm; problem of interpretation and comprehension of quantum mechanics; the wave-function collapse; the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox; time as a quantum observable, canonically conjugated to energy; maximal hermitian time operator; time analysis of quantum processes; relationship be-tween physics and biology; problem of origin of biologic life; reductionism; cosmologic problem; Big Bang; anthropic principle

  JOURNAL NAME: Natural Science, Vol.2 No.3, April 12, 2010

  ABSTRACT: The presented paper is dedicated to a new ret-rospective view on the history of natural sci-ences in XX-XXI cc, partially including the sci-ence philosophy (mainly, the problems of the scientific realism, i.e. the correspondence of science to reality) and also a novel scheme for different classes of sciences with different ob-jects and paradigms. There are analyzed the chosen “great” and “grand” problems of phys-ics (including the comprehension of quantum mechanics, with a recently elaborated new chapter, connected with time as a quantum obs- ervable and time analysis of quantum processes) and also of natural sciences as a whole. The particular attention is paid to the interpretation questions and slightly to the aspects, inevitably connected with the world- views of the res- earchers (which do often constitute a part of the interpretation questions).