Madsen, M.T., Anderson, J.A., Halama, J.R., Kleck, J., Simpkin, D.J., Votaw, J.R., Wendt III, R.E., Williams, L.E. and Yester, M.V. (2006) AAPM Task Group 108: PET and PET/CT Shielding Requirements. Medical Physics, 33, 4-15.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2135911

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Relationship between Patient-Dependent Parameters and Radiation Dose Rates Measured around Patients Undergoing PET/CT Imaging Using 18F-FDG

  AUTHORS: Khaled Soliman, Saad Al Qahtani, Ahmed Alenezi

  KEYWORDS: FDG, Measured Dose Rate, Patient Voiding Factor, Patient Attenuation Factor, Patient Size

  JOURNAL NAME: International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, Vol.7 No.3, August 30, 2018

  ABSTRACT: Objectives: Patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging are considered external radiation sources. Accurate dose rate estimates are important for conducting realistic risk assessments and performing dose reconstruction in cases of accidental exposures. The patient radiation self-attenuation factor is assumed to be a function of the patient’s body size metrics, but we can use these metrics to predict the dose rate around the patients with accuracy. The objective of this work was first to measure the patient attenuation factor by performing direct dose rate measurements from patients undergoing PET/CT imaging studies using 18F-FDG. The second objective was to study the possible correlation between the measured dose rate constant per unit activity from the patients and their body size metrics; five metrics were tested in this work. The last objective was to measure the patients’ voiding factor. Methods: We have measured dose rates at one meter from 57 patients and noted the patient’s height (H), weight (W) and calculated patient size metrics namely: Equivalent Cylindrical Diameter (ECD), Equivalent Spherical Diameter (ESD) and the Body Mass Index (BMI). Results: The measured average dose rate was 92.2 ± 14 μSv·h-1·GBq-1 measured at one meter. Therefore, the dose rate constant of 92 μSv·h-1·GBq-1 proposed by the AAPM, TG-108 report is adequate for radiation protection purposes. There was no statistically significant correlation between the dose rate constant per unit activity and the patient body size metrics. We have measured a patient voiding factor of 0.89 ± 0.06 in comparison with 0.85 recommended by the AAPM. Conclusions: The presented data can be used by medical physicist working in nuclear medicine in formulating more accurate risk estimations resulting from radiation exposure from patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.