Grow, D., Kawwass, J.F., Kulkarni, A.D., Durant, T., Jamieson, D.J. and Macaluso, M. (2014) GnRH Agonist and GnRH Antagonist Protocols: Comparison of Outcomes among Good-Prognosis Patients Using National Surveillance Data. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 29, 299-304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.007

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Mild Stimulation versus Conventional IVF: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

  AUTHORS: Natalie M. Crawford, Kashika M. Sahay, Jennifer E. Mersereau

  KEYWORDS: Minimal Stimulation, Mild IVF, IVF, Decision Analysis, Cost Analysis

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.6 No.3, March 2, 2016

  ABSTRACT: Purpose: To compare the strategy for mild stimulation IVF versus conventional stimulation IVF. Methods: A decision tree analytic model was created to compare IVF with mild stimulation versus convention stimulation in infertile women