Chambers, G.M., Sullivan, E.A., Ishihara, O., Chapman, M.G. and Adamson, G.D. (2009) The Economic Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Review of Selected Developed Countries. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 2281-2294.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Mild Stimulation versus Conventional IVF: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

  AUTHORS: Natalie M. Crawford, Kashika M. Sahay, Jennifer E. Mersereau

  KEYWORDS: Minimal Stimulation, Mild IVF, IVF, Decision Analysis, Cost Analysis

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.6 No.3, March 2, 2016

  ABSTRACT: Purpose: To compare the strategy for mild stimulation IVF versus conventional stimulation IVF. Methods: A decision tree analytic model was created to compare IVF with mild stimulation versus convention stimulation in infertile women