Polinder, S., Heijnen, E.M., Macklon, N.S., Habbema, J.D., Fauser, B.J. and Eijkemans, M.J. (2008) Cost-Effectiveness of a Mild Compared with a Standard Strategy for IVF: A Randomized Comparison Using Cumulative Term Live Birth as the Primary Endpoint. Human Reproduction, 23, 316-323.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem372

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Mild Stimulation versus Conventional IVF: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

  AUTHORS: Natalie M. Crawford, Kashika M. Sahay, Jennifer E. Mersereau

  KEYWORDS: Minimal Stimulation, Mild IVF, IVF, Decision Analysis, Cost Analysis

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.6 No.3, March 2, 2016

  ABSTRACT: Purpose: To compare the strategy for mild stimulation IVF versus conventional stimulation IVF. Methods: A decision tree analytic model was created to compare IVF with mild stimulation versus convention stimulation in infertile women