Shock, C.C., Corn, A., Jaderholm, S., Jensen, L.B., and Shock, C.A. (2001) Evaluation of the AM400 Soil Moisture Datalogger to Aid Irrigation Scheduling. In Proceedings of the International Irrigation Show, Irrigation Association, San Diego, 111-116.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Field Comparison of Soil Moisture Sensing Using Neutron Thermalization, Frequency Domain, Tensiometer, and Granular Matrix Sensor Devices: Relevance to Precision Irrigation

  AUTHORS: Clinton C. Shock, André B. Pereira, Erik B. G. Feibert, Cedric A. Shock, Ali Ibrahim Akin, Levent Abdullah Unlenen

  KEYWORDS: Soil Water, Irrigation Scheduling, Responsiveness, Soil Moisture Sensor, Porous Ceramic

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol.8 No.2, February 5, 2016

  ABSTRACT: The efficient use of irrigation water requires several kinds of information. One element of efficient irrigation scheduling is monitoring the soil moisture to assure that the crop irrigation goals are being met. Various soil moisture sensing devices were tested for irrigation scheduling in silt loam at the Malheur Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University between 2001 and 2004. Neutron probes, frequency domain probes, tensiometers, granular matrix sensors, and Irrigas were compared as to their performance under field conditions at Ontario, Oregon, USA. Granular matrix sensors were tested as read automatically by a datalogger and read manually with a hand-held meter. Practical suggestions are provided to use soil moisture sensors to the benefit of crop production and water conservation.