Chen, H., Wang, Y., Lyu, Q., Ai, A., Fu, Y., Tian, H., Cai, R., Hong, Q., Chen, Q., Shoham, Z. and Kuang, Y. (2015) Comparison of Live-Birth Defects after Luteal-Phase Ovarian Stimulation vs. Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization and Vitrified Embryo Transfer Cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 103, 1194-1201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.020

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Oncofertility in Gynecologic Malignant Tumors

  AUTHORS: Masataka Adachi, Kouji Banno, Iori Kisu, Megumi Yanokura, Moito Iijima, Takashi Takeda, Kiyoko Umene, Yuya Nogami, Eiichiro Tominaga, Daisuke Aoki

  KEYWORDS: Gynecological Cancer, Fertility Preservation, Cryopreservation, Uterine Transplantation, Pregnancy

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Cancer Therapy, Vol.6 No.14, December 8, 2015

  ABSTRACT: Long-term survival is the priority in treatment of patients with malignant tumors. In the field of gynecology, fertility preservation has also recently become an important objective due to improved treatment outcomes and different needs of patients. Methods for fertility preservation include cervical conization, ovarian protection against radiation or chemotherapy for ovarian cancer since the ovary is hypersensitive to cancer therapies, treatment of gynecological cancer during pregnancy, and cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos or ovarian tissue before treatment of malignant tumors. Radical trachelectomy for early cervical cancer and treatment with medroxy progesterone acetate for early endometrial carcinoma are also options for fertility preservation, but the efficacy and risk of recurrence have yet to be fully evaluated. The first childbirth following uterine transplantation was also achieved last year and this success has expanded the potential for pregnancy and delivery among cancer survivors.