L. Sossin and C. W. Smith, “Hard Choices and Soft Law: Ethical Codes, Policy Guidelines and the Role of Counts in Regulating Government,” Alberta Law Review, Vol. 40, 2003, pp. 867-893.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Fundamental Research on the Administrative Discretion Standard

  AUTHORS: Yang Yang

  KEYWORDS: Administrative Discretion Standard; The Standard of Interpretation; The Standard of Procedure; The Standard of “Requirements-Effect”

  JOURNAL NAME: Beijing Law Review, Vol.3 No.3, September 28, 2012

  ABSTRACT: This paper describes a system for the analysis of the administrative discretion standard. Now, it is a new phenomenon in the practice of administrative law enforcement. We shall first briefly introduce fuzzy sets and related concepts of the administrative discretion standard, and then, we try to introduce the intrinsic value of its legitimacy. At the same time, the research standard of interpretation, procedure and “requirements-effect” are discussed based on the analysis through its content. From the above discussion, the conclusion can be reached that it is the power’s structure to deal with individuals and societies on the micro side.