M. Bell, J. Torgerson, U. Seshadri-Kreaden, A. Wierda Suttle and S. Hunt, “Comparison of Outcomes and Cost for Endometrial Cancer Staging via Traditional Laparotomy, Standard Laparoscopy and Robotic Techniques,” Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 111, No. 3, 2008, pp. 407-411. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Robotic Assisted, Total Laparoscopic, and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Management of Uterine Cancer

  AUTHORS: Nevadunsky Nicole, Clark Rachel, Muto Michael, Berkowitz Ross, Ghosh Sue, Vitonis Allison, Feltmate Colleen

  KEYWORDS: Robotics; Laparoscopy; Endometrial Cancer

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Cancer Therapy, Vol.3 No.2, April 24, 2012

  ABSTRACT: Objectives: The purpose was to compare robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TRH), laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with surgical staging +/- lymphadenectomy for the management of uterine cancer. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient characteristics, pathologic data, and data related to the surgical procedure were collected from chart review. Data were analyzed with SAS statistical software. Results: A total of 102 TRHs were compared to 115 TLHs and 79 TAHs. There were more grade I and endometrial intraepithelial (EIN) lesions in the preoperative pathology of TLHs (P P P P P P P