Moradi, A. (2016). The Syrian Crisis and National Security of Iran. Strategic Policy Studies, 28, 125-152.
http://ensani.ir/fa/article/365772/%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B3%D9% 88%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%87-%D9%88 %D8%A7%D9%85%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%AA% D9%85%D9%86%D8%B7%D9%82%D9%87-%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AC% D9%85%D9%87%D9%88%D8%B1%DB%8C% D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Russian-Iranian Strategic Partnership in Syria: Converging Interests but Diverging Goals

  AUTHORS: Tan Tan, Mariia German

  KEYWORDS: Russia, Iran, Strategic Partnership, Syrian Crisis, The Middle East

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Political Science, Vol.12 No.1, December 30, 2021

  ABSTRACT: Strategic partnership is an evolving phenomenon, and there has been no consensus on its definition. But the academic endeavors by now manifest some degrees of congruence on the constitutive features of strategic partnership. This study first generalizes the constitutive features of strategic partnership. Then through the lens of these constitutive features, the relationship of Russia and Iran is examined. They have some converging interests in Syria: the common perception of a Western challenge, a high degree of military-security cooperation, similar economic motivations for their interventions in support of Assad regime, and the geopolitical importance of Syria to both countries. However, they have diverging goals in Syria too: serious ideological differences, the instrumentality of Syria in Russia’s strategy, rivalry for influence, divergent policies to Israel, and potential competitors as energy suppliers. Thus, in the framework of the Syrian crisis, Russo-Iranian relations are difficult to characterize as typical strategic partnership. Their relationship is “tactical rather than strategic” and their interactions are “pragmatic rather than systematic”.