Owen, N., Mayne, B. and Maunder, A. (2012) Professional Perspectives on Waste and Resource Management. The Chartered Institution of Waste Management. Chartered Institution of Wastes Management, Northampton.
https://www.ciwm.co.uk/Custom/BSIDocumentSelector/Pages/DocumentViewer.aspx?
id=QoR7FzWBtisamYEcWSfL6SxAJRLAPT9voNQWYgqgLJHA33jKXnEZNfy2bcrDUXe4UJKrkO
YdK0FSkir93AXPt19SFM5EF8le%252ftvvqDbDL8HzUCxYAPcz%252fKPYT%252fSkSb1yntDl
ZAOcCibWjt86c4KyzGzEsTrESVpfBwdcN58Pr4wNJh3ql2qqrFFZT2ek8wBElkGpcEvLU7BOdrGTiv
%252bQfg%253d%253d

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Economics of Recycling and Recovery

  AUTHORS: Odysseas N. Kopsidas, Stephanos D. V. Giakoumatos

  KEYWORDS: Recycling, Reuse, Consumption, Environmental, Zero Waste

  JOURNAL NAME: Natural Resources, Vol.12 No.4, April 16, 2021

  ABSTRACT: In the below-given paper, a holistic, multidisciplinary approach of goods consumption, the economics of recycling and recovery is unfolding, concisely structured, until 2013. The analysis was focused, in brief, on some economic models addressed to environmental issues, tax policies, welfare, waste management, and specifically on recycling and reuse economic modelling. Recycle is an established practice in many countries, while reuse is still under development. Reuse in many aspects is a more desirable option, as far as waste management concerns, and EU legislation seems to encourage this practice. Many industries, especially in the technology section, have developed recycle and reuse programs in order to gain an advantage, while some of them have set a target of zero waste in their production process.