Labarrere, A. (2012) Evaluation of the Quality of the First Trimester Ultrasound before and after the Application of the Decree of 23 June 2009. Medical Thesis, University of Poitiers, Poitiers.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Quality Control of First Trimester Ultrasound Examinations in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the University Teaching Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo (UTH-YO) of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

  AUTHORS: Ouattara Adama, Nde Ouédraogo Nina Astrid, Lankoandé Bako Natacha, Ouédraogo Smaila, Nare Amelie, Tougma Sanou Aline, Sawadogo Yobi Alexis, Millogo Traoré Francoise, Ouédraogo Marie Charlemagne, Ouédraogo Ali, Thieba Bonané Blandine

  KEYWORDS: Ultrasonography, First Trimester, Reports, UTH-YO

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.8 No.13, November 12, 2018

  ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the quality of first trimester ultrasound examinations in patients consulting in the gynecology and obstetrics department at the University Teaching Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo (UTH-YO) of Ouagadougou. Method: Our study took place from January 1st to March 31st 2017, in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Teaching Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo of Ouagadougou. This was a descriptive study on the records of the first trimester ultrasound of pregnancy, with analysis of the iconography. We used the criteria of the Technical Committee of Fetal Echography (TCFE) of France to analyse all the ultrasound reports brought by the patients. Results: Two hundred reports were collected in three months. In terms of ultrasound identification, only 2 reports out of 200 mentioned the brand and date of first circulation and 4 specified the type of device. The study of the quality of the appointment showed that only 52% of the ultrasounds had been performed at the right time, between 11SA - 14SA of amenorrhea. For the nuchal translucency quality, we rated by the Herman score, 41.67% of the scores were of “unacceptable” quality and only 58.33% were of “acceptable” quality we did not achieve “excellent” quality. The analysis of the biparietal diameter (BIP) cuts revealed that 1/4 only anatomical cuts had been well made. Analysis of the cranio caudal length (CCL) cuts showed that only 14.58% of the CCLs had been well done. Elements of early morphology had been explored to less than 5%. Conclusion: The results revealed the acceptable quality of the NC measurements, but a small proportion of NC achieved. The quality of the ultrasound, morphological analysis and biometrics period is not very acceptable.