van Cleeff, M., Kivihya-Ndugga, L., Githui, W., Ng’ang’a L., Kibuga, D., Odhiambo, J., et al. (2005) Cost-effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction versus Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy for diagnosis of tuber-culosis in Kenya. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 9:877-83.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Direct real-time PCR examination for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory samples can be cost effective

  AUTHORS: Bryan Joseph Renton, Patricia Denise Morrell, Richard Peter Davidson Cooke, Peter David Owen Davies

  KEYWORDS: Tuberculosis; PCR and Cost Effective

  JOURNAL NAME: Health, Vol.1 No.2, September 28, 2009

  ABSTRACT: Aim: To assess whether the use of direct real- time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on smear-positive sputa can be cost-effective, by speciating mycobacteria earlier than current methods and thereby preventing unnecessary screening tests as part of the contact tracing process. Methods: A retrospective study of all patients with smear-positive sputa in a Liverpool teach-ing hospital between 2004 and 2007. All the PCRs performed on these patients were re-viewed and compared them with their myco-bacterial culture results. Unit costs for PCR, chest X-ray (CXR), tuberculin skin test (TST), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and medical/nursing time were conservatively estimated at £50, £11, £10, £40 and £30 respectively. The total PCR costs were compared with the costs of unnec-essary follow up of patients, negative for My-cobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) by PCR, sub-sequently confirmed to be MTB culture nega-tive. Results: 203 smear-positive patients under-went direct PCR testing. 126 (62%) patients grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), 74 (37%) had environmental mycobacterial infection (EMI) and 3 (1%) were culture negative. Of the 126 patients’ culture positive MTB patients, 123 were PCR positive and 3 PCR negative. Of the 77 pa-tients that were culture negative for MTB, 75 were PCR negative and 2 PCR positive The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for direct PCR versus MTB culture were 98%, 96%, 98% and 97% respec-tively. Total costs of all PCRs performed amounted to £10,150. The cost of contact pro-cedures for PCR-negative and MTB culture- negative index cases was estimated at £19,650. This equated to a total saving of £9,500 in contact tracing costs. Conclusions: Direct PCR examination testing of smear-positive patients can be cost-effective in areas where there is a high incidence of EMI.