Sandor, R.L., Bettelheim, E.C. and Swingland, I.R. (2002) An Overview of a Free-Market Approach to Climate Change and Conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A—Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360, 1607-1620.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Co-Benefits and Risks of Implementation of Forestry Activities for Climate Change Mitigation in India

  AUTHORS: Indu K. Murthy, K. V. Devi Prasad

  KEYWORDS: Forestry Mitigation, Co-Benefits, Climate Change, Risks, Sustainable Development

  JOURNAL NAME: Natural Science, Vol.10 No.7, July 30, 2018

  ABSTRACT: Implementation of forestry activities as a climate change mitigation option is likely to result in a range of outcomes in addition to carbon sequestration and these include changes with respect to environmental, social and economic aspects. These impacts to the extent when positive are deemed “co-benefit” and if adverse and uncertain, imply risk. It is important to recognize that implementation of forestry mitigation activities can have varied environmental, socio-economic co-benefits and/or risks. Further, there is no general agreement on attribution of co-benefits and risks to specific forestry mitigation activities. An overarching risk to mitigation potential that could be realised by implementation of forestry activities is climate change. But, overall, forestry mitigation activities also contribute to the sustainable development agenda. Maximizing co-benefits of forestry mitigation measures can increase efficiency in achieving the objectives of other international agreements.