Fergenson, D.P., Pitesky, M.E., Tobias, H.J., Steele, P.T., Czerwieniec, G.A., Russell, S.C., Lebrilla, C.B., Horn, J.M., Coffee, K.R., Srivastava, A., Pillai, S.P., Shih, M.T.P., Hall, H.L., Ramponi, A.J., Chang, J.T., Langlois, R.G., Estacio, P.L., Hadley, R.T., Frank, M. and Gard, E.E. (2004) Reagentless Detection and Classification of Individual Bioaerosol Particles in Seconds. Analytical Chemistry, 76, 373-378.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac034467e

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Modern Probe-Assisted Methods for the Specific Detection of Bacteria

  AUTHORS: Arghavan Shabani, Christophe A. Marquette, Rosemonde Mandeville, Marcus F. Lawrence

  KEYWORDS: Bacteria Detection, Probes, Optical, Piezoelectric, and Electrochemical Biosensors

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Vol.8 No.2, February 15, 2015

  ABSTRACT: This review intends to present an overview of methods currently under development for the specific and sensitive detection of pathogenic bacteria that exist in a variety of human environments. Bacteria continue to be a major health threat in general, and much effort is being deployed to counteract this problem. In a first instance, current and efficient techniques in use for the detection of bacteria are described. In a second instance, this review serves to compare the more conventional techniques to emerging technologies for the direct (non-labelled) detection of bacteria (referred to as “biosensors”). These approaches are mainly optical, piezoelectric, and electro-chemical in nature. They are cost-effective, quite sensitive, and potentially portable for rapid on-site/real-time detection, and rapid prevention. These devices are comprised of specific chemical/ biochemical probes immobilized onto physical transducers. This work also presents comparisons between the efficiencies (assay time and sensitivity) of various techniques being employed.