A Comparison and Performance of Different Optical Switching Architectures
Salman Ali AlQahtani
DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2011.48063   PDF    HTML     5,255 Downloads   9,466 Views   Citations


Optical Packet Switching (OPS) and transmission networks based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) have been increasingly deployed in the Internet infrastructure over the last decade in order to meet the huge increasing demand for bandwidth. Several different technologies have been developed for optical packet switching such as space switches, broadcast-and-select, input buffered switches and output buffered switches. These architectures vary based on several parameters such as the way of optical buffering, the placement of optical buffers, the way of solving the external blocking inherited from switching technologies in general and the components used to implement the WDM. This study surveys most of the exiting optical packet switching architectures. A simulation-based comparison of input buffered and output buffered architectures is presented. The performance analysis of the selected two architectures is derived using simulation program and compared at different scenarios. We found that the output buffered architectures give better performance than input buffered architectures. The simulation results show that the-broadcast-and-select architecture is attractive in terms that it has lees number of components compared to other switches.

Share and Cite:

S. AlQahtani, "A Comparison and Performance of Different Optical Switching Architectures," International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 8, 2011, pp. 514-522. doi: 10.4236/ijcns.2011.48063.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] F. Masetti, et al., “High Speed, High Capacity ATM Optical Switches for Future Telecommunications Transport Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1996, pp. 979-998. doi:10.1109/49.510922
[2] S. L. Danielsen, et al., “WDM Packet Switch Architectures and Analysis of the Influence of Tunable Wavelength Converters on Performance,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1997, pp. 219-227. doi:10.1109/50.554327
[3] T. Zhang, et al., “Shared Fiber Delay Line Buffers in Asynchronous Optical Packet Switches,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2006, pp. 118-127. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2006.1613777
[4] K. Kasahara, et al., “Double Heterostructure Optoelectronic Switch as a Dynamic Memory with Low Power Consumption,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 52, No. 9, 1988, pp. 679-681. doi:10.1063/1.99345
[5] F. Masetti, et al., “ATMOS (ATM Optical Switching): Results and Conclusions of the RACE R2039 Project,” 21st European Conference on Optical Communication, Brussels, 17-21 September 1995, pp. 645-652. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-254082
[6] R.S. Tucker, “Optical Packet-Switched WDM Networks: A Cost and Energy Perspective,” Optical Fiber Communication Conference, San Diego, 24-28 February 2008, pp. 1-25. doi:10.1109/OFC.2008.4528328
[7] Z. Hass, “The Staggering Switch: An Electronically Controlled Optical Packet Switch,” The Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1993, pp. 925-936. doi:10.1109/50.233257
[8] R. S. Tucker, “Photonic Packet Switching,” Proceeding of the OFC’95, Tutorial, February 1995, pp. 4-28. doi:10.1109/OFC.2008.4528328
[9] W. D. Zhong, M. Tsukada, K. Yukimatsu and Y. Shimatsu, “Terahipas: A Modular and Expandable Terabit/Second Hierarchically Multiplexing Photonic ATM Switch Architecture,” The Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1995, pp. 1307-1315. doi:10.1109/50.301823
[10] D. K. Hunter, M. C. Chia and I. Andonovic, “Buffering in Optical Packet Switches,” The Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 16, No. 12, 1998, pp. 2081-2094. doi:10.1109/50.736577
[11] D. K. Hunter, W. D. Cornwell, T. H. Gilfedder, A. Frenzen and I. Andonovic, “SLOB: A Switch with Large Optical Buffers for Packet Switching,” The Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 16, No. 10, 1998, pp. 1725-1736. doi:10.1109/50.721059
[12] B. Ramamurthy and B. Mukherjee, “Wavelength Conversion in WDM Networking,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 16, No. 7, 1998, pp. 1061-1073. doi:10.1109/49.725178
[13] J. M. H. Elmirghani, and H. T. Mouftah, “All-Optical Wavelength Conversion: Technologies and Applications on DWDM Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2000, pp. 86-92. doi:10.1109/35.825645
[14] B. S. Glance, et al., “New Advances on Optical Components Needed for FDM Optical Networks,” The Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 11, No. 5-6, 1993, pp. 882-889. doi:10.1109/50.233252
[15] C. Guillemot, et al., “Transparent Optical Packet Switching: The European ACTS KEOPS Project Approach,” The Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 16, No. 12, 1998, pp. 2117-2134. doi:10.1109/LEOS.1999.811768
[16] H. Takahashi, et al., “Arrayed-Waveguide Grating for Wavelength Division Multi/Demultiplexer with Nanometer Resolution,” Electronics Letters, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1998, pp. 87-88. doi:10.1049/el:19900058
[17] C. Dragone, “An N * N Optical Multiplexer Using a Planar Arrangement of Two Star Couplers,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 3, No. 9, 1991, pp. 896-899. doi:10.1109/68.84502
[18] T. Durhuus, et al., “All-Optical Wavelength Conversion by Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers,” The Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1996, pp. 942-954. doi:10.1109/50.511594
[19] K. Sasayama, K. Habara, W. D. Zhong and K. Yukimatsu, “Photonic ATM Switch Using Frequency-Routing-Type Time-Division Interconnection Network,” Electronics Letters, Vol. 29, No. 20, 1993, pp. 1778-1779. doi:10.1049/el:19931184
[20] M. G. Hluchyj and M. J. Karol, “Queueing in High-Per- Formance Packet Switching,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 6, No. 9, 1988, pp. 1587-1597. doi:10.1109/49.12886

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.