Personality of Students of Economics, Medicine, and Verbal Communication: Preliminary Results
J. Richter, R. Neumann
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.23039   PDF    HTML     6,529 Downloads   11,834 Views   Citations


Differences on personality between students of economics, medicine and verbal communication should be explored by means of the Temperament and Character Inventory. Students of economics are mainly characterized by lower harm avoidance and lower reward dependence and higher self directedness than medical students and students of verbal communication. Students of all groups seem to overestimate their self-directedness with economical students showing the most pronounced tendency of overrating, whereas medical students tend to overrate their cooperativeness more than the students from the other groups. The obvious disturbed self-evaluation corresponds to the students’ professional orientation. The students can be characterized by specific and varying types and impact of social desirability depending on their professional career.

Share and Cite:

Richter, J. & Neumann, R. (2011). Personality of Students of Economics, Medicine, and Verbal Communication: Preliminary Results. Psychology, 2, 248-253. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.23039.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45-74. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00143.x
[2] Borg, M. O., & Stranahan, H. (2002a). The effect of gender and race on student performance in principles of economics: The importance of personality type. Applied Economics, 34, 586-598. doi:10.1080/00036840110039249
[3] Borg, M. O., & Stranahan, H. (2002b). Personality type and student performance in upper-level economics courses: The importance of race and gender. Journal of Economic Education, 33, 3-14. doi:10.1080/00220480209596120
[4] Buddeberg-Fischer, B., Klaghofer, R., Abel, T., & Buddeberg, C. (2003). The influence of gender and personality traits on the career planning of Swiss medical students. Swiss Medicine Weekly, 133, 535-540.
[5] Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality.
[6] Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment resources, Inc.
[7] Hojat, M. & Zuckerman, M. (2008). Personality and specialty interest in medical students. Medical Teacher, 30, 400-406. doi:10.1080/01421590802043835
[8] Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[9] Holland, J. L. (1994). Self-directed search. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
[10] Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analy- sis of big-six interests and big-five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 217-239. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1854
[11] Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., de Fruyr, F., & de Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: A five/factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36, 1050-1056. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x
[12] Linn, B. S., & Zeppa, R. (1984). Does surgery attract students who are more resistant to stress?. Annals of Surgery, 200, 638-643. doi:10.1097/00000658-198411000-00014
[13] Myers, I. (1975). Manual: Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[14] Ziegert, A. L. (2000). The role of personality temperament and student learning in principles of economics: further evidence. Journal of Economic Education, 31, 307-322.
[15] Zeldow, P. B., & Daugherty, S. R. (1991). Personality profiles and specialty choices of students from two medical schools. Academic Medicine, 66, 283-287. doi:10.1097/00001888-199105000-00012

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.