Analysis of a Methanol-Power Polygeneration System from Natural Gas

Xiaona Song

Electrical and Mechanical Practice Center, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing, China.

DOI: 10.4236/jpee.2014.24010                

Abstract

This paper analyzes the characteristics of a Natural Gas (NG)-based Methanol-Power Polygeneration System (MPPS). The structures and parameters of the polygeneration systems are investigated to explore the appropriate process for each polygeneration system. And some effective methods, such as exergy distribution analysis and energy-utilization diagrams (EUD) are adopted to investigate the performance & characteristic of the system. The results reveal that, MPPS adopted Partial Reforming and Partial Cycling synthesis (PR/PC) process can reach good performance, while MPPS exhibits poor performance when adopting Full Reforming and Once Through synthesis (FR/OT) process. Through further study with exergy analysis method, we find that the particular synthesis and separation properties of methanol lead to such difference. Therefore, the characteristics of chemical product should be important factors in the configuration and integration of polygeneration systems. The work of this paper is significant for the research and development of polygeneration system.

Keywords

Polygeneration System; Exergy Distribution Analysis; EUD

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Jackson, R.G. (1989) Polygeneration System for Power and Methanol Based on Coal Gasification. Coal Conversion, 3, 60-64.
[2]	Gao, L., Jin, H., Liu, Z., et al. (2004) Exergy Analysis of Coal-Based Polygeneration System for Power and Chemical Production. Energy, 29, 2359-2371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.046
[3]	Li, H., Gao, L., Chen, B., et al. (2006) Proposal of a Natural-Gas Based Polygeneration System for Power and Methanol Production. Proceedings of ECOS, Crete, 679-686.
[4]	Michiel, J.A., Andre, P.C., Carlo, N., et al. (2002) Exploration of the Possibilities for Production of Fischer Tropsch Liquids and Power via Biomass Gasfication. Biomass & Bioenergy, 23, 129-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00037-5
[5]	Chiesa, P., Consonni, S., Kreutz, T., et al. (2005) Co-Production of Hydrogen, Electricity, and CO2 from Coal with Commercially Ready Technology. Part A: Performance and Emissions. Hydrogen Energy, 30, 747-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.08.002
[6]	Kreutz, T., Williams, R., Consonni, S. and Chiesa, P. (2005) Co-Production of Hydrogen, Electricity, and CO2 from Coal with Commercially Ready Technology. Part B: Economic Analysis. Hydrogen Energy, 30, 769-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.08.001
[7]	Jin, H., Han, W. and Gao, L. (2007) Multi-Functional Energy System (MES) with Multi Fossil Fuels and Multi Products. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 129, 331-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2432895
[8]	Steinberg, M. (1998) Production of Hydrogen and Methanol from Natural Gas with Reduced CO2 Emission. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 23, 419-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00092-X
[9]	Jin, H., Ishida, M., Kobayashi, M., et al. (1997) Energy Evaluation of Two Current Advanced Power Plants: Supercritical Steam Turbine and Combined Cycle. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 119, 250-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2794998
[10]	Jin, H. and Ishida, M. (1993) Graphical Energy Analysis of Complex Cycles. Energy, 18, 615-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(93)90040-K