Self-Construal and Subjective Wellbeing in Two Ethnic Communities in Singapore
Weining C. Chang, Mohd Maliki bin Osman, Eddie M. W. Tong, Daphne Tan
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.22011   PDF    HTML     7,143 Downloads   13,747 Views   Citations


The study reported here addressed two questions concerning the applicability to other collectivist cultures of a model developed on the basis of socially defined self-construals and their consequences for subjective wellbeing (Kwan, Bond, & Singelis, 1997). In contrast to the social centrality of the Singaporean Chinese, Islam enjoys centrality in the Malay community. Is subjective well-being in these two cultures attributable to independent or interdependent self-construal? Do parallel paths to subjective wellbeing originate from these two forms of self-construal? Are the respective mediators, self-esteem and relationship harmony, functioning in the same way in these different communities? Two hundred and eighty-six participants (121 Malays, including 49 females and 72 males, and 165 Chinese, including 62 males and 103 females, average age, 18.52) were drawn from three tertiary technical training institutes in Singapore. Independent and interdependent self-construal, Rosenberg’s Self-esteem Scale (SE), the Relationship Harmony Scale (RH) (Kwan, et al. 1997) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SL) (Diener, Emmons. Larsen, & Griffins, 1985) were administered to test the model. For the Chinese, the best-fit model required a path between the two forms of self-construal, confirming their overlapping nature. For the Malays, a radically different model fits the data: relationship harmony no longer functions as a mediator but as an independent contributor in its own right. These results raise questions about the meaning and consequences of socially defined self-construal in different collectivist cultures, and the path between ¬the self and subjective wellbeing.

Share and Cite:

Chang, W. , Osman, M. , Tong, E. & Tan, D. (2011). Self-Construal and Subjective Wellbeing in Two Ethnic Communities in Singapore. Psychology, 2, 63-70. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.22011.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[2] Chang, W. C. (2003). Correction for differential response bias for between group comparison. Research Note, Asian Cultural Psychology Project, National University of Singapore.
[3] Chang, W. C. (2001, April). Multifaceted Chinese self. Paper presented at the 59th Nebraska Symposium of Motivation, Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska.
[4] Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
[5] Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653-663. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.653
[6] Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
[7] Huang, L. L. (1999). Harmony and conflict of interpersonal relationships: Indigenized theorization and research (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Laurate Books.
[8] Kwan, S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038- 1051. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1038
[9] Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). An evaluation of subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 17, 1-18. doi:10.1007/BF00354108
[10] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
[11] Mohammad, N. B., Mohammad, I. B., & Chang, W. C. (2003). Stress- and-coping of Malay children in Singapore. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology, Manila, Philippines.
[12] Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164
[13] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[14] Shahiraa, Binte, M., & Chang, W. C. (2004). Stress-and-coping in the Malay organizational context. Working paper, Singapore: Center of Asian Cultural Psychology, Nanyang Technological University.
[15] Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. doi:10.1177/0146167294205014
[16] Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., Sharkey, W. F. & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpacking culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 315-341. doi:10.1177/0022022199030003003
[17] Tong, E. M. W., Chang, W. C., & Koh, J. B. K. J. (2003). Differential psychological functioning based on the orthogonality of self-construals. Manuscript under review, Asian Cultural Psychology Project, National University of Singapore.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.